C# Discussion Boards - CodeProject

musefan8-Jan-09 4:57

8-Jan-09 4:57

well the issue occurs with less then 10 controls but there could potentially be alot more.

Does anybody have a suggestion for setting the scroll position on scroll drag?

I would like to be able to drag the scroll bar in increments of 50 pixels for instance

#realJSOP8-Jan-09 5:55

#realJSOP

8-Jan-09 5:55

Without seeing your implementation, I feel compelled to call the design "crap". I've been coding for Window since Windows 3.0 was a "good idea", and I've NEVER ONCE had to implement a scrolling form, with the exception of a mobile application (using C++/MFC), and even that was eventually scrapped in favor of a wizard-type form.

"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

musefan8-Jan-09 6:12

8-Jan-09 6:12

have you never used a dataGridView then?
if you want many rows of data they wont always fit on the screen.
hence why controls like dataGridView have scroll bars

what happens if one of your users minimises the application to be smaller then the page with your controls on?

Jon Rista8-Jan-09 7:06

Jon Rista

8-Jan-09 7:06

musefan wrote:
what happens if one of your users minimises the application to be smaller then the page with your controls on?

The simple answer is, you don't let them. Forms can have a minimum fixed size, preventing them from shrinking smaller than the minimum size required by their content. Figure out what the smallest possible size is that will fit for the greatest majority of your users, and fix that as your minimum.

musefan8-Jan-09 22:13

What's the best way to check that

8-Jan-09 22:13

Dont get me wrong i dont want to seem argumentative with this issue as i really do appreciate the feedback from everyone.

One issue as i have said is that even one control can grow to be bigger than the panel, whatever the panel size (which itself has to fit within the users screen).

The controls i am using are not disimilar to those of a forum, where a number of replys are listed on a page. and there size grows as needed to fit the content of the message etc.

If i copy and paste this message a few times, chances are it wont all fit on your screen. hence the scroll bar to show all.

you see this used in many application. for instance a word document will not all fit on screen at once if the content is large enough. You cant just cut the content when it fills the screen and expect to put the rest on another part of the application.

Now i appreciate that certain progroms such as web browsers are made to handle this kind of thing and are therefore optimised for the task, but you cant say that scroll bars should never be used cause some cases require that kind of functionality. (This paragraph would not even be here if the text box i am typing in didnt scroll)

CodingLover7-Jan-09 23:46

CodingLover

7-Jan-09 23:46

Hi all,

I want to execute and exe, basically a process. Everything is fine. But I want to know what's the best way to handle this. Let me explain.

Say I start the process on a click event, but the button is not disable. So a user can click on it again. At that point I want to check that process is already running. If it's running I don't want to run it again.

What I have done here is, use a global variable and once the process is started make it to true. Once a user click that button, simply validate that variable. Is that a good practice?

Thanks

I appreciate your help all the time...
CodingLover Smile | :)

Lev Danielyan7-Jan-09 23:55

Lev Danielyan

7-Jan-09 23:55

I would disable the button on starting the process and enable it back when the process is done working.
Like this:

private void button1_Click_1(object sender, EventArgs e) {
   button1.Enabled = false;
   Process proc = new Process();
   proc.StartInfo.FileName = "notepad.exe";                       
   proc.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
   proc.Exited += new EventHandler(proc_Exited);            
            
   proc.Start();
}

void proc_Exited(object sender, EventArgs e) {
   button1.Enabled = true;
}

Regards,
Lev

CodingLover8-Jan-09 0:04

CodingLover

8-Jan-09 0:04

But the reason is I cannot disable the button. On that single click event I want to start two process. One of it is continuously running, that's what I want to check in this case. Other process can be start/stop randomly.

I appreciate your help all the time...
CodingLover Smile | :)

Lev Danielyan8-Jan-09 0:14

Lev Danielyan

8-Jan-09 0:14

Well, if you cannot disable the button, then, I guess, you should go for what Giorgi has suggested

Regards,
Lev

Dragonfly_Lee8-Jan-09 19:44

Dragonfly_Lee

8-Jan-09 19:44

Well, the behavior of this button is rather confused for user. Sometimes, refactor the design would be better choice. Roll eyes | :rolleyes:

I Love KongFu~

Giorgi Dalakishvili8-Jan-09 0:00

Giorgi Dalakishvili

8-Jan-09 0:00

You can use Process.GetProcessesByName[^] method to find out if the process is already running.

Giorgi Dalakishvili

#region signature
My Articles

Asynchronous Registry Notification Using Strongly-typed WMI Classes in .NET [^]

My blog
#endregion

#realJSOP8-Jan-09 0:04

#realJSOP

8-Jan-09 0:04

I have a class that I call Runner. It starts the required process, and then starts a background worker object that serves to allow the programmer to terminate the process. When the process terminates (either normally or by user-intervention, it fires a custom event and the calling form handles the event.

Using a class like this, you could disable the button when the process is started, and re-enable it when the process terminates. Alternatively, you could leave the button enabled and check to see if a globally-defined runner object is != null to see if you should display a message to the user or not.

I originally wrote this code so that I could track how much time was spent running the spawned process.

CodingLover8-Jan-09 0:08

CodingLover

8-Jan-09 0:08

Thanks for the comment.

Ya, that's the way I'm normally working on. But the thing here is I cannot disable the button. As I said in earlier post, in that click event I have to start two process.

I appreciate your help all the time...
CodingLover Smile | :)

#realJSOP8-Jan-09 0:23

#realJSOP

8-Jan-09 0:23

Would you like me to post the code for you?

sourabhsorate9-Jan-09 23:35

sourabhsorate

9-Jan-09 23:35

Hello, Here is the code

private void button3_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
button3.Enabled = false; Process proc = new Process(); proc.StartInfo.FileName = "notepad.exe"; proc.EnableRaisingEvents = true; proc.Exited += new EventHandler(proc_Exited); proc.Start();
}
void proc_Exited(object sender, EventArgs e)
{

myDelgate d = new myDelgate(enableBtn);
this.Invoke(d);
}
void enableBtn()
{
button3.Enabled = true;
}

Remember u should add the statement

public delegate void myDelgate();

inside the class which declare a delegate

I hav sucessfully disable the button on starting notepad and enable afte exiting the notepad

hope this code will help you.

adress standardization

lawrenceinba7-Jan-09 23:33

lawrenceinba

7-Jan-09 23:33

hi friends anyone got idea for standardizing the input address into standand format which will be configued by the developer

preferred language is c#

DaveyM697-Jan-09 23:56

DaveyM69

7-Jan-09 23:56

Get each section of the address seperately from user and use string.Format(...) to do your thing.

Dave
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)

Eddy Vluggen8-Jan-09 0:31

Eddy Vluggen

8-Jan-09 0:31

What do you mean by "address"? Do you mean a postal-location, or a mailaddress or something?

I are troll Smile | :)

lawrenceinba8-Jan-09 1:02

lawrenceinba

8-Jan-09 1:02

ya it refers postal ADDRESS

do u have any idea

Ashfield8-Jan-09 1:31

Ashfield

8-Jan-09 1:31

In which case it all depends on the country - there are multiple different formats for addresses. Pick one you like and use it Smile | :)

Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP

lawrenceinba8-Jan-09 1:46

lawrenceinba

8-Jan-09 1:46

this is the standard address....

no : 5,abc building,xx street,yy city,country

but the user may give any in any order...my program should standadize it in the above format

abc building,no : 5,xx street,country,yy city

this is the input from the user

Eddy Vluggen8-Jan-09 1:58

Eddy Vluggen

8-Jan-09 1:58

lawrenceinba wrote:
the standard address

Local yes, but other countries may use different formats.

I are troll Smile | :)

musefan8-Jan-09 1:49

8-Jan-09 1:49

One idea for you to think about:

if you have an address for example that consists of 4 data fields i.e

Street
City
Country
Postcode

you can assigned each value an index like

street = 0, city = 1, country = 2, postcode = 3

then you ask the user for there preffered order;

maybe they put street(0), city(1), postcode(3), country(2)

then when you load your address data which should always be stored in a standardised format you can load it in the order required based on the index values.

Sorry if this is not making to much sense, its a hard one to explain

do you get the idea?

musefan8-Jan-09 1:55

8-Jan-09 1:55

an example:

string[] loadedAddress = {"Street", "City", "Country", "Postcode"};//values loaded from datasource
int[] userFormat = {0, 1, 3, 2};//order format specified by the user

for(int i = 0; i < userFormat.length; i++)
{
    textbox1.text += loadedAddress[userFormat[i]] + "\n";//writes each address line to a textbox line
}