|
i dont think you have to define it, well, what type of application is this?
Величие не Бога может быть недооценена.
|
|
|
|
|
mine is win32 sdi based application........
|
|
|
|
|
did u tried disabling incremental linking?
Величие не Бога может быть недооценена.
|
|
|
|
|
yes..now i tried...but not worked...
|
|
|
|
|
Just refer this link too
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3k67zd6z%28VS.71%29.aspx
Величие не Бога может быть недооценена.
|
|
|
|
|
should i need to rebuild the project everytime when ever i change some settings in my application?i am just building..i think this is enough..!
i set the incremental linking disabled and tried...but i am getting the same errors
|
|
|
|
|
Clean and rebuild is a good option always 
well i am not getting exact reason, but i hope there is something wrong with some defintion, i afraid it to be some macro.
And try to check for any duplication of resource ID.
Величие не Бога может быть недооценена.
modified on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 8:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
What should i do if i have a macro definition problem?Generally people are getting same kind of problems when they migrate code.(Like ICON,MANIFEST...Etc)But i got this tricky dialog problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi RJ,
I am working on a project that is to be migrated from vs-2003 to vs-2008.In my application i have 11 different projects.I am giving all my .lib files into project settings->linker->input->additional dipendencies... But in my project settings->linker->command line i am not getting all the .lib files..i am missing three .lib files....Because of that reason i am getting 362 linking errors,all errors are due to not linking with the missing libraries... the errors are as follows..
fwfipd.lib(fwfpelcp.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual class ATL::CStringT<char,class StrTraitMFC_DLL<char,class ATL::ChTraitsCRT<char> > > __thiscall DblTinyInt::getString(void)const " (?getString@DblTinyInt@@UBE?AV?$CStringT@DV?$StrTraitMFC_DLL@DV?$ChTraitsCRT@D@ATL@@@@@ATL@@XZ)
......and many other errors.......
can you please give some remedy to my problem?i will be thanks in advance.......
|
|
|
|
|
Look in your .rc files - that's what it's complaining about, I think - something in the resources (the .rc files) NOT resource.h
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
hi i have checked..but actually i dont have an id created for the PRINTSTATUS dialog.evn if i set an id to the dialog i am getting more and more errors... i dont have a duplicate id in my .rc file.why i am getting this i dont know.. please help
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
i'm trying to use a DDX_Radio in the DoDataExchange of my CDialogBar but when i call the UpdateData to get the DDX value i get an error.
Do i have to do some kind of initializaztion befor i can use the DDX controls?
Does anyone have any suggestion about how resolve this problem?
tnx
|
|
|
|
|
Crownless wrote: i get an error.
You need to explain what the error is before anyone can begin to offer any suggested solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Debugging I can see that I get the error on the DDX_Radio function that I call in the DoDataExchange of my DialogBar.
The error is a "simple" Debug Assertion Failed!
|
|
|
|
|
You should really try to provide all the useful information:
- Code snippet + where the code is crashing
- Exact error message (if there is a message in the assertion, it is probably for a reason, no?)
|
|
|
|
|
well... i'll try to explain better the situation...
i have a CDialogBar with this DoDataExchange:
void CMyDlgBar::DoDataExchange(CDataExchange* pDX)
{
CDialogBar::DoDataExchange(pDX);
DDX_Radio(pDX, IDC_RADIO1, miRadio);
}
i create my CDialogBar in my MainFrame and then i call a function for the initialization of my class.
int CMainFrame::OnCreate(LPCREATESTRUCT lpCreateStruct)
{
if(CFrameWnd::OnCreate(lpCreateStruct) == -1)
return -1;
mMyDlgbar.Create(this,
IDD_DLGBAR,
CBRS_LEFT | CBRS_HIDE_INPLACE,
IDD_DLGBAR);
ShowControlBar(&mMyDlgbar, FALSE, FALSE);
mMyDlgbar.InitDialog( );
return 0;
}
My InitDialog function calls the UpdateData(FALSE) (or UpdateData(TRUE), it's the same).
void CMyDlgBar::InitDialog()
{
UpdateData(FALSE);
}
the UpdateData function calls the DoDataExchange of my class, i get the error on the DDX_Radio function.
No particular message is provided when i get the error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello people!
I know this sounds sick, but...sadly in our project the requirement arose to let the user click on a control "behind" a modal dialog. This control is on the main window of our application which is also the parent of the modal dialog and the requirement says that the user should be able to click around this one control in the main window but he should not be able to use anything else that is not on the modal dialog.
I know i could make the dialog modeless and disable everything on the main window except for this one control but this solution doesn't sound all that "sophisticated" and i am hoping for a better one, not to mention that if i disable everything else on the main window the user will still be able to move it around and resize it while the dialog is up and that is also not acceptable but hacking into the moving-sizing functionality also sounds disgusting. Another problem with this aproach would be that certain things around the main window might change enabled-disabled states while the dialog is up depending on certain events (mostly triggered by changes in hardware) so simply disabling everything and re-enabling them once the dialog is closed is not that obvious as it sounds.
Another thing i can think of is capturing the mouse input to the dialog and checking what is under the mouse when it is clicked and if it is that certain control, post/send the mouse messages to it, this might or might not work and also this causes problems when the user tries to move the dialog itself around or when it clicks on a button in the dialog.
I tried catching the needed mouse messages in CWinApp::ProcessMessageFilter or CWinApp::PreTranslateMessage but these don't seem to get called if the user clicks outside of the dialog.
So, any of you have a better idea how to do this if it is possible at all? Is there maybe a filter method i could overwrite somewhere that filters out clicks outside of the modal dialog?
Thanks in advance.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. <
> Sometimes you just have to hate coding to do it well. <
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you move/copy the control on the modal box?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
That idea crossed my mind too but this control is very much integrated into its surroundings not to mention this solution would cause a huge crowd of angry willagers chasing me with pitchforks and torches. Thanks for the idea though.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. <
> Sometimes you just have to hate coding to do it well. <
|
|
|
|
|
Code-o-mat wrote: this control is very much integrated into its surroundings
This shouldn't be a problem: just copy the needed context and functionality.
Code-o-mat wrote: not to mention this solution would cause a huge crowd of angry willagers chasing me with pitchforks and torches.
I could not see a viable solution to... 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
In the DialogBox() or DialogBoxParam() call set hWndParent to NULL: this creates an 'unowned' dialog, which decouples it somewhat from your main window. Also set EXSTYLE WS_EX_TOPMOST in your dialog resource definition: this will keep the dialog on top of all other windows. You should then be able to click a button on the main window. You will probably also need to disable all the controls on the main window except the one allowed one if the dialog is active.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your suggestion but this seems to be the same thing as the first possible solution i described in my post which i don't want to use. Correct me if i am missing something obvious here.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. <
> Sometimes you just have to hate coding to do it well. <
|
|
|
|
|
Code-o-mat wrote: Correct me if i am missing something obvious here.
Nothing I can think of, but I still think that the effort required to achieve what you are suggesting is not worth it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
