|
problem: when i press button "build" - not "build all", VC 6.0 compiles all of files in the project now.
normally, it should not compile any file because there is no file has been modified.
i met the problem before, i fixed it with run anti-virus, but the method doesn't work now.
so, in the moment, even i just modify one line in one cpp file, vc 6.0 compiles all of files, i have to wait for over 10 minutes for this huge project. normally vc just compiles the file modified then links it to others - totally few seconds.
it consumes all of my time for two days.
do u know how to solve the problem?
thx
includeh10
|
|
|
|
|
Problems with dates of files? Try pressing build after a build --normally no extra build is done.
Watch your system time, it might be set in the past or something, check also the sates of your files to rule out any odd date. These things happens sometimes.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
system time keeps going, no compile and run time error.
i guess one of h file is corrupted, but i can't find which one.
i have no idea.
includeh10
|
|
|
|
|
In explorer, do a search for *h, *.cpp, *.rc etc from the root of the project. Show details.
Sort by date. Are any of the files "newer" than "now"? If so, open them edit them trivially
(i.e. press <space> and <delete>) and save them. Clean the project and compile. This will do
a full compile, but now everything should be in sync. (Not the pop group...)
Iain.
ps. I've had this problem copying between my laptop and main pc when I've come back from the
far east and forgotten to change my clock back...
|
|
|
|
|
hi, mate, it works!
many thanks and ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
far east is a magic place, isn't it?
includeh10
|
|
|
|
|
There are have many library such as GDI, GDI+, OpenGL, DirectX.
I want to build small image viewer that able to zoom, score with dithering on 16-bit screen display mode.
Could any one tell me, if I have an image in memory what is the fastest way to show it on screen?(both in window's frame and full-screen mode without resolution and color-depth change) What's library you use? 
|
|
|
|
|
I normally use GDI/MFC for my "serious" programming as I'm not writing games. Ease of writing /
debugging is more important here than performance. I've not touched GDI+ but it does appear a
little easier. But with more overhead...
For raw speed of display I'd go with DirectX. But you pay the penalty in programming headache.
OpenGL is good for 3d stuff, but I've found it not so good for 2d work.
In the final analysis, "It depends". If performance wasn't critical to you, you wouldn't be
asking, so I'd have to say DirectX.
Iain.
|
|
|
|
|
How i can create a setup application using Windows Installer SDK. Let me know from where i can get Source Code. or anything that can help.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like some information on this as well. I remember when the MSI thingy came out there was a tool (I think from Microsoft) that let you create a installer from a Wizard. But the only thing I can find now is the SDK, wich as of right now I don't have the time to dive into and learn.
-----
IMHO: C# a poor attempt at bringing C++ to the VB masses
-----
|
|
|
|
|
I need to generate an XML file from a bytearray. Can somone help me with that?
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
My prefered XML library is XML4C[^]. Much more efficient than MSXML and open source to boot.
/ravi
Let's put "civil" back in "civilization"
http://www.ravib.com
ravib@ravib.com
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
My prefered XML library is XML4C[^]. Much more efficient than MSXML and open source to boot.
Ravi, have you tried our own pugxml http://www.codeproject.com/soap/pugxml.asp[^]?
I'm using this more and more and just love it. Mind you it is probably a bit light on, compared to XML4C, but do you realy need all that extra stuff. The answer I'm sure is, it depends.;)
Neville Franks, Author of ED for Windows. www.getsoft.com
Make money with our new Affilate program
|
|
|
|
|
I was impressed by Kristen's article. We've been using XML4C for a couple of years, hence the continuation. The latest version (5.2) contains some nice features and uses the latest Xerces (2.2) parser.
/ravi
Let's put "civil" back in "civilization"
http://www.ravib.com
ravib@ravib.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
ONX_Model is a class.
class CModel : public ONX_Model
{
}
what does this mean?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
it means that CModel inherit class ONX_Model.
It is a inheritance.
|
|
|
|
|
ONX_Model is an existing class.
And u r inheriting a class CModel with a public visibility mode
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I am trying to call Invalidate(FALSE) function from a thread to update my screen, I am getting error "illegal call of non-static member function". I want to update the screen after I process some data in my thread. How to do that?? can anybody suggest something?
Regards
Satya
|
|
|
|
|
your thread function is a static function i.e. it does not operate on a specific object and does not have a 'this' pointer.
Invalidate() is a non-static method i.e. it requires an object to operate on. you need to pass an object pointer through to the thread (typically as the thread parameter) and then use that to call Invalidate() i.e.
<br />
CWnd* pThis = (CWnd*) threadParam ; <br />
pThis->Invalidate( FALSE ) ; <br />
Software is everything. It also sucks. Charles Fishman [^]
Awasu 1.0.2 (beta)[^]: A free RSS reader with support for Code Project.
|
|
|
|
|
It isn't a good idea to try and use CWnd objects in worker threads, because they don't appear in the handle map for the worker thread. This leads to all sorts of problems. Better to just use the HWND (Window Handle).
Neville Franks, Author of ED for Windows. www.getsoft.com
Make money with our new Affilate program
|
|
|
|
|
If you have HWND via GetSafeHwnd or m_hWnd been passed to your function,
just call api's directly ::InvalidateRect(hwnd,NULL,FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all, does anyone here know of any tools that could port MFC codes or libraries to MacOS X Jaguar?
Some URLs would be great. 
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
For serious xplatform GUI development, I recommend Qt[^]. Not cheap, but worth it imho.
/ravi
Let's put "civil" back in "civilization"
http://www.ravib.com
ravib@ravib.com
|
|
|
|
|
I have been messing around with wxWindows. In my opinion its a great library. the syntax is very similar to MFC, so MFC coders will take to it right away. Best of all its.. FREE. Most of my MFC apps I have successfully converted to wxWindows, and with very little effort have compiled them under Win32, Mac, and Linux. It might be worth a try.
http://www.wxwindows.org[^]
-----
IMHO: C# a poor attempt at bringing C++ to the VB masses
-----
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I've heard good things about wxWindows too, although I haven't used it personally.
/ravi
Let's put "civil" back in "civilization"
http://www.ravib.com
ravib@ravib.com
|
|
|
|
|
It is a good tools indeed but so sad that we had started our project in MFC 
but still, a big thanks
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
