|
Why do you have to minimize the mainframe window? If you want the newly opened dialog to have focus until it is dismissed, then just use a modal dialog. See CDialog::DoModal()[^]
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
The dialog should be visible thru entire application and should not minimize at any time.
Dialog should not be modal why because my control should not restrict to dialog. Dialog should be accessible and my mainframe views should be accessible, based on the control from the dialog mainframe views will replaced with the reqd content.
|
|
|
|
|
do u want only minimize your document?
user can restore it?
|
|
|
|
|
sdi mainframe windows splitter into 2 rows and 2nd row into two columns, where views will replaced based on the selection of the controls in the dialog
|
|
|
|
|
HBITMAP hBitmap = 0;
hBitmap = (HBITMAP)LoadImage( NULL,
pDoc->cInfo.strContractBrand,
IMAGE_BITMAP,
0,
0,
LR_LOADFROMFILE | LR_DEFAULTSIZE);
CBitmap Bitmap;
Bitmap.Attach( hBitmap );
BITMAP BitmapInfo = { 0 };
Bitmap.GetBitmap( &BitmapInfo );
DWORD BitmapImageSize = BitmapInfo.bmHeight *
BitmapInfo.bmWidth *
( BitmapInfo.bmBitsPixel / 8 );
BYTE* pBitmapData = new BYTE[ BitmapImageSize ];
ZeroMemory( pBitmapData, BitmapImageSize );
Bitmap.SetBitmapBits(BitmapImageSize, pBitmapData);
Bitmap.SetBitmapBits( BitmapImageSize, pBitmapData );
pDC->SelectObject(&Bitmap);
pDC->BitBlt(1280, -1765, 390, -230, pDC,
0, 0, SRCCOPY);
delete pBitmapData;
pBitmapData = 0;
purpose:
i want to load a bitmap from file and insert in document. the file location is in C..Doc and PDoc is pointer to its document.
MapMode is MM_LOMETRIC.
problem:
it dosen't show anything. 
i don't see anything in desired coordinate and print blank page.
notice:
i find these codes in web and didn't work with CBitmap class.
even didn't use bitmap in my programs.
|
|
|
|
|
Your question is very unclear. What is this document you are talking about ? The document class from an SDI app ? If yes, a document class is not something visible, it is supposed to be data only. Are you talking about the view ?
Furthermore, what is this pDC you are using in your code snippet ? Where did you put this code ?
|
|
|
|
|
sry forget it the code is in C..View and pdc defined there.
program is SDI
|
|
|
|
|
Amin.Abdi wrote: pDC->BitBlt(1280, -1765, 390, -230, pDC, // pDC : a CDC pointer to document (SDI Program)
0, 0, SRCCOPY);
What is the purpose of bit-blitting from pDC to pDC itself?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
dcMem.SelectObject(&Bitmap);
pDC->BitBlt(1280, nYposChange-1765, 390, -230, &dcMem, 0, 0, SRCCOPY);
fixed but still nothing 
|
|
|
|
|
What's the purtpose of a negative height?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
because of MapMode
modified on Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
And why do you need the following statements?
Amin.Abdi wrote: BYTE* pBitmapData = new BYTE[ BitmapImageSize ];
ZeroMemory( pBitmapData, BitmapImageSize );
Bitmap.SetBitmapBits(BitmapImageSize, pBitmapData);
Bitmap.SetBitmapBits( BitmapImageSize, pBitmapData );
The last line is because you don't trust MFC? 
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
I change my codes :
remove that statement and add these:
CClientDC dcMem;
dcMem.SelectObject(&Bitmap);
pDC->BitBlt(1280, nYposChange-1995, 390, 230, &dcMem, 0, 0, SRCCOPY);
but it show a print screen of window and print nothing. WHY and how can i fix it?
|
|
|
|
|
You should put your drawing code inside the CView::OnDraw method.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
i put it on a function and call the function in C..View::OnDraw.
|
|
|
|
|
I would do this test:
CDC memDC;
memDC.CreateCompatibleDC(pDC);
dcMem.SelectObject(&Bitmap);
pDC->BitBlt(0, 0, 390, 230, &dcMem, 0, 0, SRCCOPY);
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
THANX
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome.
As about negative height, when you should make something work, I suggest the 'stay simple' principle: start trying with 'fail-proof' parameters and then, when it works a bit, began to change..
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have today date, how can I get the date of 15,30,45 days back?
My code is to get today date and time:
CTime newtime=CTime::GetCurrentTime();
struct tm temp;
newtime.GetLocalTm(&temp);
WCHAR szStr[20];
wsprintfW(szStr,_wasctime(&temp));
AfxMessageBox(szStr);
|
|
|
|
|
MPTP wrote: I have today date, how can I get the date of 15,30,45 days back?
You could use the COleDateTime[^] class. Just take a look at the member functions the class has to offer. Given a date, the class offers ways to find the day of the year, from which you'd have to subtract 15, 30 or whatever. Try it and if you didn't succeed, post whatever you tried (the code).
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Create a CTimeSpan[^] object with the correct number of days and substract it from your CTime object.
BTW, you don't need to make such a complex conversion to print the time in a string. Do yo know that CTime has a Format[^] function which is probably far easier to use than to convert to a tm structure first ?
Another point: is there a particular reason why you are using wide-char strings instead of unicode independant strings (TCHAR) ? You might want to read this article[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody,
I don't know is this the right forum to ask this question. Guide me if I am wrong.
Right now I am working on some network related file systems.
My difficulty is to determine the desired access level of a file in its shared mode.
For example, I have a file opened with some dwDesiredAccess level flags set using CreateFile API.
Some other process is asking for the same file with a different dwDesiredAccess level flags which may or may not succeed when I call the CreateFile API.
Is there a way I can determine the result of the second CreateFile API without calling it?
ie, is there a way I can validate the second dwDesiredAccess by checking with the first dwDesiredAccess and return ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION to the client without making a call to CreateFile API?
Please let me know if some good articles or other useful information available anywhere.
Thanks in advance
cheers
Varghese Paul
|
|
|
|
|
Just check GetAclInformation([^] and ACL.
Величие не Бога может быть недооценена.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Paul,
In a nutshell, you just want to know the available access level of a file and you do not want to call CreateFile if the desired access level is not available for that file? If I have understood your query correctly, then you could try this:
int nCheck = 0;
int nReturn = _taccess(_T("C:\\Users\\Rajesh\\Downloads\\7z465-x64.msi"), nCheck);
if(nReturn == 0)
{
}
if(nReturn == -1)
{
}
It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini
|
|
|
|
|
Varghese Paul M wrote: Is there a way I can determine the result of the second CreateFile API without calling it?
ie, is there a way I can validate the second dwDesiredAccess by checking with the first dwDesiredAccess and return ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION to the client without making a call to CreateFile API?
I don't believe so...and anyway, even if you could, the results could be invalid (by someone opening another handle on the file) before you could use them. Just open the file and be done with it. If it fails, it fails! But Win32 will tell you, through a combination of return code and GetLastError.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
