|
I am converting a program I wrote in C to MFC
In C
I used CreateWindow to Create the Main Window and the Second Param
LPCTSTR lpWindowName,
Was the Window Name
I am able to Do A FindWindow on this to get the Window Handle
When I converted the Program to MFC the Wizard Creatred a bucnh of Objects
Cwnd .. (guess for the Client Are .. CFrameWnd for the Frame
I guess I was looking for Where .. Some overrideable method to insert the Window
Title
When I tried doing it durning ::OnCreate using SetWindowText the Window title Displayed but the FindWidnow
didn't get the Window Handle
Durning PreCreateWindow setting the Window name by setting lpszName memeber of CreateStruct structure
The Program bombed
I am using FindWidow in Dos App to Do IPC with the GUI PROGRAM
thankx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just looked up the API on MSDN for this API I need the Class name in My Case I used AFXregisterclassname
|
|
|
|
|
I have a class called subscriber in a project. Several classes inherit from it but as of now, none use the functionality. The destructor is empty but calls the STL <list> destructor. Since the class isn't used yet, the list is empty. This then crashes the program when shutting down because the empty list of pointers creates a null pointer in the <list> destructor. Is it me or aren't empty lists supposed to disappear without trying to empty themselves?
Class is below.
Mark Jackson
class subscriber
{
public:
subscriber() {}
subscriber(const subscriber& s);
~subscriber() {}
virtual void update() = 0;
void subscribe(broadCaster * b);
void unSubscribe(broadCaster * b);
void unSubscribe();
private:
std::list<broadCaster *> _mBroadList;
typedef std::list<broadCaster *>::iterator iterator;
}; // subscriber
|
|
|
|
|
mjackson11 wrote: because the empty list of pointers creates a null pointer in the <list> destructor
Huh ??
if no one "subscribe" the list will be empty; the size will be zero.
if there are subscription, then the list will be non-empty; it's not the job of the subscriber class to delete the broadCaster; so no major
cleaning to be done here.
in the destructor, I would do (just to be certain)
_mBroadLost.clear();
This signature was proudly tested on animals.
|
|
|
|
|
Duh, careless virtual in a baseclass declaration led to multiple calls to the destructor.
|
|
|
|
|
Using pointers to things as the element type template parameter to STL collections can be somewhat tricky. Is there any reason in particular why you are using a list<broadCaster *> instead of just list<broadCaster>? With a list of pointers to broadCaster objects, maintaining the lifetime of the objects pointed at by those pointers typically becomes an issue. This is just a general guideline though - depending on your specific requirements it might make sense to do this.
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, Make your destructor virtual. If you're accessing derived class object though base class point and if you delete it, derived class constructor will not be called.
See FAQ[^]
-Sarath.
"Great hopes make everything great possible" - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Why I can't see the result of my program (Win32 Console Application)in Vc++8.
for example:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
cout << "The First Program - Welcome";
return 0;
}
thank you
soso
|
|
|
|
|
anassamar wrote: Why I can't see the result of my program (Win32 Console Application)in Vc++8.
What do you mean by 'result'?
How have you executed the program?
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Because you are running it from within the IDE. You can either call getch() after cout, or run the program from a command prompt.
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
With C++ I/O functions, I'm trying to read in file contents but search for a particular point in the file. For example:
int main() {
string line;
ifstream inFile;
inFile.open("C:\\LOCATIONOFFILE\\Desktop\\the.msg");
if (!inFile) {
cout << "Unable to open file";
exit(1);
}
if (inFile.is_open())
{
while (! inFile.eof() )
{
getline (inFile,line);
cout << line << endl;
}
inFile.close();
}
return 0;
This reads in the first line of the file.
1. Is there a way to read in a specific line number? Something like getline (inFile,lineNumber100) ?
2. Can I point to a specific position in the line?
3. How can I apply regex to this in order to search entire files for particular strings in a file?
Sorry to be a pain but, if anyone can help...
Thanks
modified on Thursday, March 12, 2009 5:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
su_penguin wrote: 1. Is there a way to read in a specific line? Something like getline (inFile,lineNumber100) ?
No - lines are all of different lengths.
su_penguin wrote: 2. Can I point to a specific position in the line?
Once you've read it in? Yes- line.begin() + the_position_you_want_remember_its_zero_based
su_penguin wrote: 3. How can I apply regex to this in order to search entire files for particular strings in a file?
Using Boost.Regex[^] or std::tr1::iterator (as included in VS2008), I'd read the file into a string and then use a regex_iterator or regex_token_iterator to search through the string. You can't search through the file directly with regex_iterator or regex_token_iterator because an istream_iterator (the iterator for files) doesn't have the characteristics required for regex iterators.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart Dootson wrote: su_penguin wrote:1. Is there a way to read in a specific line? Something like getline (inFile,lineNumber100) ? No - lines are all of different lengths.
Yes, you can't directly jump to a specific file offset if each line in the file can be of a different length. You could scan for "new line" characters and skip (N - 1) "new lines" where N is the line number that you want to navigate to. But figuring out what exactly is a "new line" can be tricky ("\n" on POSIX, "\r\n" on Windows, "\r" on macs).
|
|
|
|
|
Hey.
I'm trying to store a general, overall class that will store other classes within for a much easier accessible object, however, I keep running into the same problem.
Here's a small example of the code i'm trying to produce:
class A {
public:
A();
~A();
};
class B {
public:
B();
~B();
A Foo;
};
And it keeps throwing the same error at me, that there's an unrecognised identifier before the variable 'Foo', and that default-int isn't supported (obviously).
Class A is in a seperate header file, but i'm including it at the top of the header file for Class B. However, no matter what I try, it refuses to believe that 'class A' exists, and can't reference to it. I've even tried using the typedef keyword to declare 'class A' as an identifier, but even that won't work.
I can't find any results over Google, nor here, about this problem. Can anyone assist?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
the following project
#pragma once
class A {
public:
A();
~A();
};
#pragma once
class B {
public:
B();
~B();
A Foo;
};
#include "A.h"
A::A(){}
A::~A(){}
#include "A.h"
#include "B.h"
B::~B(){}
B::B(){}
#include "A.h"
#include "B.h"
void main()
{
A a;
B b;
}
compiles fine even with VC++ 6.0.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
This code (all in one file) compiles fine (with g++, but msvc will compile it as well) for me. There must be something else stopping B seeing A.
class A
{
public:
A() {}
~A() {}
};
class B
{
public:
B() {}
~B() {}
A foo;
};
One thing you could try is just running the code through the pre-processor (cl -E, if I remember rightly) to see what the compiler really sees.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Hm, running it through the pre-processor didn't really do much, since i'm pretty new to C++.
All the headers are linked though. The header file which requires class 'A' has the inclusion for class A in the header.
To be honest, I don't understand how it wouldn't be linking them together, they're all connected and 'class A' is definately being declared in (eg) 'A.h'. 'B.h' then includes 'A.h', and then requires 'A Foo' further down in the code.
There are appropriate .cpp files that are also used with the initializers etc. and i've included both 'A.h' *and* 'B.h' in both of those files.
It's just refusing to recognise 'class A' as any type of identifier, yet if I hover over the keyword 'A', it tells me that it's a class etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you post the content of a.h, b.h?
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Well, i've found a sort-of solution now. I'm currently declaring "class A;" after the "B.h" inclusion, but i'm going to run through my headers and make sure they're not getting mixed up. It might be that they're linked incorrectly (even if they're linked in the files that need them).
|
|
|
|
|
Having a forward declaration for A (that's the 'class A;') shouldn't help in the definition of B - B would need to see the full definition of A to have a member of type A.
Oh well. If you've got it to work...
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly. However, I placed #ifndef _SOCKETS_OBJ_DECLARED_ around the 'class A;', and in the 'B.h' at the end, I added #define _SOCKETS_OBJ_DECLARED_
Then, when I placed an #error "Undeclared" in the #ifndef, it threw the error.. so for some reason, the header is being included but it's not globally declaring the 'class B'. It's really strange, and another programmer said he couldn't explain it.
The best I can do is go through it with a fine toothcomb and hopefully find where it's not declaring properly.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if you've just got a missing semi-colon or something somewhere - that can cause really bizarre error messages and can be really hard to spot.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
