C / C++ / MFC

How can I have tow different view type of the same document in a SDI Doc-View based app?

Joseph Marzbani4-Mar-09 9:41

4-Mar-09 9:41

See I have a SDI app with a (e.g.) CEditView drieved view. Now I want to create another view of my document, drived from (e.g.) CRichEditView. I dislike the user to have a splitter window at the execute time, but when pressing a menu item. can I use CFrameWnd::CreateView? how if yes?

Thank you masters!

Re: How can I have tow different view type of the same document in a SDI Doc-View based app?

Stuart Dootson4-Mar-09 10:22

Stuart Dootson

4-Mar-09 10:22

Do you want to display both views at once (in which case having a splitter is really the best idea) or one view at a time?

Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

Re: How can I have tow different view type of the same document in a SDI Doc-View based app?

Joseph Marzbani4-Mar-09 18:09

Joseph Marzbani

4-Mar-09 18:09

Yes, both at once

Thank you masters!

Re: How can I have tow different view type of the same document in a SDI Doc-View based app?

«_Superman_»4-Mar-09 17:16

«_Superman_»

4-Mar-09 17:16

Since CRichEditView is derived from CView you must use CRichEditView::Create (Actually CWnd::Create) and then use CDocument::AddView. CFrameWnd::CreateView is for views that are not derived from CView.

«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.

Confused

su_penguin4-Mar-09 8:40

su_penguin

4-Mar-09 8:40

class Employee {
public:
    Employee(string name = "No Name", 
        string id = "000-00-0000",
        double salary = 0)
    : _name(name), _id(id)
    {
        _salary = salary;
    }

    ...
};

I'm not sure what the [ : _name(name), _id(id) ] does. Can anyone please explain?

Thanks

Re: Confused

Adam Maras4-Mar-09 9:04

Adam Maras

4-Mar-09 9:04

They're initializer shortcuts for your member variables. Those statements are the same as saying

_name = name;
_id = id;

immediately within your constructor body.

Re: Confused

su_penguin4-Mar-09 9:32

su_penguin

4-Mar-09 9:32

Quick follow up:

: _name(name), _id = id
     {
	_salary = salary;
     }

Shouldn't I be able to do this?

Thanks

Re: Confused

CPallini4-Mar-09 10:10

CPallini

4-Mar-09 10:10

That's not allowed, see, for instance [^].
Smile | :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke

[My articles]

Re: Confused

«_Superman_»4-Mar-09 17:20

«_Superman_»

4-Mar-09 17:20

No, but you can do this.

: _name(name)
     {
	_id = id;
	_salary = salary;
     }

The difference is that _name(name) is initialization and _id = id is assignment.
This is equivalent to

type _name = name;

and

type _id;
_id = id;

«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.

Re: Confused

Jijo.Raj4-Mar-09 16:38

Jijo.Raj

4-Mar-09 16:38

Hello su_penguine,

Its called constructor initializer list. Check this[^] and this[^] for more information.

Regards,
Jijo.

_____________________________________________________

http://weseetips.com[^] Visual C++ tips and tricks. Updated daily.

Infantile question?

Ric Ashton4-Mar-09 8:00

Ric Ashton

4-Mar-09 8:00

Does anyone know why Skype seems incompatible with Vista Home edition?
Sorry its not a C++ question. But you guys are the best.

Re: Infantile question?

Eytukan4-Mar-09 8:04

Eytukan

4-Mar-09 8:04

Ric Ashton wrote:
Does anyone know why Skype seems incompatible with Vista Home edition?

Because your question is incompatible with this forum. Poke tongue | ;-P

Better place to ask :Here[^]

He never answers anyone who replies to him. I've taken to calling him a retard, which is not fair to retards everywhere.-Christian Graus

Re: Infantile question?

Adam Maras4-Mar-09 8:05

Adam Maras

4-Mar-09 8:05

Ric Ashton wrote:
Sorry its not a C++ question.

You are indeed correct.

Re: Infantile question?

CPallini4-Mar-09 10:02

CPallini

4-Mar-09 10:02

Re: Infantile question?

CPallini4-Mar-09 10:04

CPallini

4-Mar-09 10:04

C is my preferred programming language. I know it is not the expected answer, but since you're our fan... Roll eyes | :rolleyes:

Finished 2 C++ books, starting third and questions remain

EliottA4-Mar-09 7:02

EliottA

4-Mar-09 7:02

The first 2 books didn't address these issues and the third book assumes the reader has the following knowledge, so I turn to codeproject for the answers, google came up with mixed results for some of the following, so I was hoping a community with experience could sum it up nicely instead of working through google more then what I have,

What exactly are the following datatypes

1. Handle
2. PVOID
3. DWORD

Also, a general question, why use pointers (*) if you can use Addresses (&) to reference objects?

Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^]

Re: Finished 2 C++ books, starting third and questions remain

led mike4-Mar-09 7:08

led mike

4-Mar-09 7:08

1,2 and 3 are not C++ types. They are code defined types so you should be able to go to the definition using the IDE tools you are working with.

The general rule I go by is to only use pointers when absolutely necessary. Mostly this translates to when it has been determined that using the heap is required. Also translates to when a reference type will not satisfy the requirements.

Re: Finished 2 C++ books, starting third and questions remain

Eytukan4-Mar-09 7:18

Eytukan

4-Mar-09 7:18

Handle : Handle to an object. It may point to any object. For example a Handle to a window.

PVOID is nothing but a void*. "P" means a pointer.

DWORD is 32 bit unsigned integer.

EliottA wrote:
Also, a general question, why use pointers (*) if you can use Addresses (&) to reference objects?

The general answer is , if you can use & do not use *. Moreoever you can send * as *&.

He never answers anyone who replies to him. I've taken to calling him a retard, which is not fair to retards everywhere.-Christian Graus

Re: Finished 2 C++ books, starting third and questions remain

Ric Ashton4-Mar-09 8:12

Ric Ashton

4-Mar-09 8:12

You need to buy the complete reference book.
Something like the 'The Waite Group's' Turbo C++ Bible, or
something more up-to-date.
Utilising DWORD (for example) is a complex issue reserved for
programmers with some experience.
To find out what it is used for and how it is used you might
involve yourself with the complex issue of 'sound' and search
the internet for applicable code in this area.

I think this is why nobody had yet replied.

Re: Finished 2 C++ books, starting third and questions remain

David Crow4-Mar-09 9:35

David Crow

4-Mar-09 9:35

EliottA wrote:
What exactly are the following datatypes

1. Handle
2. PVOID
3. DWORD

See here.

EliottA wrote:
Also, a general question, why use pointers (*) if you can use Addresses (&) to reference objects?

See here.

"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

Re: Finished 2 C++ books, starting third and questions remain

EliottA5-Mar-09 3:18

EliottA

5-Mar-09 3:18

Thanks buddy

Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^]

switch to existing instance [modified]

negativeG4-Mar-09 7:01

negativeG

4-Mar-09 7:01

My app allows users to start a 'helper' applet that runs independently. I am using a mutex to limit this applet to a single instance. I use the mutex both to prevent starting the second instance from my app (by CreateProcess or ShellExecute)AND to have any second instance started outside my (by clicking icons, etc) to self-terminate.

How can I have them switch to the current instance of the applet? That is, if they select to run the applet from my app I don't want to ignore it or display a message that an instance is running. I want to make that instance be get focus and be the top most application.

Thanks,
-G

modified on Wednesday, March 4, 2009 1:39 PM

Re: switch to existing instance

led mike4-Mar-09 7:10

led mike

4-Mar-09 7:10

Is there some reason you bolded your entire post? I'm so distracted by it I can't even read the post.

Re: switch to existing instance

Eytukan4-Mar-09 7:21

Eytukan

4-Mar-09 7:21

Exactly. That's really harmful to the eyes. Dead | X|

He never answers anyone who replies to him. I've taken to calling him a retard, which is not fair to retards everywhere.-Christian Graus

Re: switch to existing instance

negativeG4-Mar-09 7:45

negativeG

4-Mar-09 7:45

Not intentionally.
That is how the post came up when I started it. I thought the preview just came that way. Reviewing it, I see that there as indeed a bold tag around it all, which I have since removed (I hope)
Sorry.
-G

General News Suggestion Question Bug Answer Joke Praise Rant Admin

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.