|
Stewie Griffin wrote: You should think of an algorithm with the division ( / ) and mod ( % ) operators to split a number.
Yes, typically. But in this case, the program is prompting the user for the numbers so it is already in string form.
He can take the input string...
char[] n1 = "456";
...and "split the number" by accessing it character by character. Then covert each character to an int:
digit0 = n1[0] - '0';
digit1 = n1[1] - '1';
|
|
|
|
|
Robert.C.Cartaino wrote: ...the program is prompting the user for the numbers so it is already in string form.
So put them into a numeric variable (e.g., int) instead. 
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"The brick walls are there for a reason...to stop the people who don't want it badly enough." - Randy Pausch
|
|
|
|
|
I originally attempted the char[] approach, but my compiler (Dev-C++) constantly returned an error the minute I attempted to do any type of mathematical operation.
And I do actually like the algorithmic approach. I will give it a try. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello guys,
I'm writing an MFC application that uses a splitter window - a "windows explorer" application. It is a typical windows explorer style application - it has a Treeview in the left pane for navigation, and a Frame that displays various views at different times in the right hand frame. I have a small usability problem - whenever the user opens a new dialog by interacting with the view displayed in the right hand frame, focus returns to the left hand pane (the treeview), rather than the right Frame which holds the current View, typically a Form View.
This is bad - surely focus should return to where it was lost from when the dialog was given focus - the right pane/ Form View.
I call this code from BOOL CMainFrame::OnCreateClient(LPCREATESTRUCT /*lpcs*/, CCreateContext* pContext) :
m_wndSplitter.SetActivePane(0, 1) ;
However, this doesn't help, or have any discernible effect. Perhaps I've misunderstood what this method does - according to MSDN documentation- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/52afb8hs(VS.80).aspx[^] -, it "sets the pane as active", and "is called by the framework" - I guess that means it is intended that the programmer should provide their own implementation of this virtual function, so they can do house keeping when the right hand pane gets focused by the user, rather than being intended for the programmer to call directly. What should I do to achieve the desired effect of having focus return to the right hand pane?
Regards,
Sternocera
|
|
|
|
|
Sternocera wrote: I guess that means it is intended that the programmer should provide their own implementation of this virtual function, [snip] rather than being intended for the programmer to call directly.
No
"You can explicitly call SetActivePane to change the focus to the specified view."
You are probably experiencing a timing issue
"This member function is called by the framework"
You are probably calling it first and then the framework is calling it.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: You are probably experiencing a timing issue
Yes, but I'd like to have focus return to the right hand pane by default - surely there is a better way than repeatedly calling SetActivePane(), SetFocus(), or some equivalent?
|
|
|
|
|
I have this:
HANDLE hFile;
DWORD wmWritten;
char code[1024];
hFile = CreateFile(filename,GENERIC_READ|GENERIC_WRITE,FILE_SHARE_READ,NULL,OPEN_ALWAYS,FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,NULL);
ReadFile(hFile,code,1024,&wmWritten,NULL);
CloseHandle(hFile);
but i always get a 1024 char file, i mean if the file has more than 1024 chars then it will just show up the first 1024 of them. What should I do for getting always the exact number of chars the file will have. I mean I want a way to get the number of chars instead of just typing 50000 instead of 1024 because if i do that it ll show up iiiiiiiiiiiiiii or something like that for completing the 50000 chars if the value is lower than that.
thanks.
modified on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
letueros wrote: What should I do for getting always the exact number of chars the file will have.
I suggest you start by learning to read the documentation[^]
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
thanks, it worked but I used GetFileSize(... for getting the DWORD value, but there seems to be something unusual though at the end of the char* it always says ýýýý««««««««îþîþîþ. Should I remove that manually i mean by replacing that by "" or substringing it or is there a better way to get rid of it?
|
|
|
|
|
letueros wrote: Should I remove that manually
No, simply put a '\0' character in the appropriate spot in code.
"Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown
"The brick walls are there for a reason...to stop the people who don't want it badly enough." - Randy Pausch
|
|
|
|
|
Hello every one,
I have one question regarding neural networks and it's functionality. I'm newbie in this field.
Actually i want to use a supervised neural network to estimate a function values at different locations.
Suppose we want to estimate y = x^2 and we have some training data to learn the network
x=1 => y=1
x=2 => y=4
x=3 => y=9
x=4 => y=16
x=5 => y=25
Now suppose we want to estimate function value at x = 10
At first it seems that Back propagation is the best network for this purpose but after i tried some source code from CodeProject i found out that Back Propagation can only estimate function values that are around the training set!(Tell me if I'm wrong!) so for example it can estimate function at x=4.5 but it cannot estimate function at x=10 (i think it will return 25)
So which type of Neural Network should i use for this purpose? Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to create some menu items dynamically in a popup menu, varying text, some of which then need check marks against them, and some need to be disabled (greyed).
This all works fine except for the disabled / greyed state.
They are created with InsertMenuItem() and everything is set up in the MENUITEMINFO struct. Everything works fine - including the check marks - except that they never come up disabled.
When I modify them with SetMenuItemInfo(), again everything fine except the disabled state.
At the end of all modifications DrawMenuBar() is called, but it doesn't seem to make any difference either way.
Any suggestions as to why?
|
|
|
|
|
Nick01223 wrote: and everything is set up in the MENUITEMINFO struct.
Can you show the code that initializes the struct?
Have you tried EnableMenuItem()?
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, didn't work either.
But, literally this minute I've fixed it.
Was using WM_MENUSELECT instead of WM_INITMENUPOPUP as the trigger for the updating. Must occur at a different time, and greying must be different to check marks, because what was happening was the greying didn't work, but if while the menu was down you quickly moved the mouse off the menu (ie off the menu window) - it rapidly updated to the greyed state. Use WM_INITMENUPOPUP and it works all the time.
Must be to do with idle time processing.
Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
Nick01223 wrote: Was using WM_MENUSELECT instead of WM_INITMENUPOPUP as the trigger for the updating. Must occur at a different time
Very different 
"The WM_INITMENUPOPUP message is sent when a drop-down menu
or submenu is about to become active. This allows an application
to modify the menu before it is displayed, without changing
the entire menu."
"The WM_MENUSELECT message is sent to a menu's owner window when
the user selects a menu item."
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, clearly.
I just assumed that detecting selection of the top level menu item where the popup was would have the same effect. Obviously not!
|
|
|
|
|
Testing CPHog with my newly installed Firefox 3.0.1
Can you hear me now? 
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
no
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Sure because you're to busy stuffing your face with a double cheeseburger! 
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
I am looking for an advise, explanation of using CAVI.
My BITMAPINFO bmiColors at index 0 appears to have RGB color quad (red , green, blue and reserved) OK but it looks like the "reserved" is actually the next red value.
I have been looking thru the documentation and cannot find explanation for usage of "reserved" "color" and how it gets “filled”.
Any help is appreciated.
Vaclav
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what CAVI is, but...
Are you sure the bitmap HAS an RGB color table?
What are the BITMAPINFO.bmiHeader values?
Vaclav_Sal wrote: cannot find explanation for usage of "reserved"
From the RGBQUAD docs: "Reserved; must be zero."
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Mark,
my bitmap has all required values. The code works "almost perfect", I actually display the captured video, however, I need the color histogram and this is where I see strange values.
And the "reserved" value is NOT zero after the single frame capture!
I think I am overlooking some AVI macro to control the "reserved" value.
It looks like the AVI "bitmap" is plain RGB, not a RGBQUAD.
PS. CAVI - multimedia macros - example "capGetVideoFormat".
Thanks Vaclav
|
|
|
|
|
Again...What are the BITMAPINFO.bmiHeader values?
The format is pretty important
Are you the one constructing the BITMAPINFO?
What code is setting the color table values?
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Mark,
just FYI. I think I can figure this out by myself.
Here is the AVI calback setup and its callback function.
BOOL bCallback = capSetCallbackOnFrame(hWnd, _grabber_CallbackProc);
The docs saiz something about "..and will display it in created window".
It does and that what tru me off - there is no need to convert it to bitmap and then display it if I only want to see it in view window. OK.
However, the _grabber_CallbackProc SetImageData method copies the raw data and it gets messed up in BITMAPINFO!
What I really need is to find out the "layout" of the LPVIDEOHDR and than copy it into BITMAPINFO color map correctly.
Or better yet - do my histogram extraction on the AVI data directly.
LRESULT PASCAL _grabber_CallbackProc(HWND hWnd, LPVIDEOHDR lpVHdr)
{
ASSERT_VALID(theOnlyOneGrabber);
validCallHint = TRUE;
// set grabber image data
theOnlyOneGrabber->SetImageData(lpVHdr->lpData);
validCallHint = FALSE;
return 0;
}
PS As always - ignore the > !!
Thanks for reading.
Vaclav
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
