C / C++ / MFC

Re: How do I keep menu attributes that exist when the menu refreshes?

4-Apr-06 7:27

jonesap5 wrote:
...but when the menu refreshes the items are re-enabled...

During the refresh, are you calling SetMenuItemInfo() or EnableMenuItem()?

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

jonesap54-Apr-06 7:30

jonesap5

4-Apr-06 7:30

What happens is I select submenu item from the 'Tool' Menu and it refreshes or recreates the main menu. At that point the sub menu items I disabled in the 'File' Menu are re-enabled. Does that make sense?

Re: How do I keep menu attributes that exist when the menu refreshes?

Michael Dunn4-Apr-06 11:31

Michael Dunn

4-Apr-06 11:31

If you're using MFC, read this FAQ:
7.1 In my MFC program, I'm trying to disable a menu item with EnableMenuItem(), but it doesn't have any effect on the menu. Why?[^]

--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP Cool | :cool:

LINKS~! Ericahist | NEW!! PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ

Re: How do I keep menu attributes that exist when the menu refreshes?

jonesap54-Apr-06 12:21

jonesap5

4-Apr-06 12:21

I am not using MFC, I am actually using a Win32 project.

kill COM calls in thread

viperlogic4-Apr-06 5:47

4-Apr-06 5:47

i have a thread that calls the following

CoInitializeEx()
CoInitializeSecurity()
CoCreateInstance()
ConnectServer()

if the thread isnt successful in 3secs (using WaitForSingleObject(pThread->m_hThread, 3000)) it is closed.

what is the best way of killing a thread from outside the thread, i am using TerminateThread() but i dont think this is the best way??

it appears thou that the calls in the thread are not being killed off because if i go to start the thread again CoInitializeSecurity() throws up an error saying that it cant initialize security. so iam assuming it is saying this because the thread wasnt killed off right

plz help

ThatsAlok4-Apr-06 6:46

ThatsAlok

4-Apr-06 6:46

viperlogic wrote:
what is the best way of killing a thread from outside the thread, i am using TerminateThread() but i dont think this is the best way??

Set a boolean varible depending on it state terminate the thread

viperlogic4-Apr-06 6:56

4-Apr-06 6:56

what command do i use to kill the thread thou from outside the thread?

ThatsAlok4-Apr-06 7:05

ThatsAlok

4-Apr-06 7:05

viperlogic wrote:
what command do i use to kill the thread thou from outside the thread?

same, change the value of boolean variable from outside, which thread is checking from inside...

viperlogic4-Apr-06 7:40

4-Apr-06 7:40

sorry, i dont understand, example please

thanks

David Crow4-Apr-06 7:28

4-Apr-06 7:28

viperlogic wrote:
what is the best way of killing a thread from outside the thread...

See here.

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

viperlogic4-Apr-06 8:01

4-Apr-06 8:01

so i use the following to delete a thread from outside?? Does "delete pThread" call ExitThread??

switch(WaitForSingleObject(pThread->m_hThread, 3000))
{
case WAIT_TIMEOUT:
{
delete pThread;
break;
}

case WAIT_OBJECT_0:
{
// thread has terminated on its own
break;
}
}

David Crow4-Apr-06 8:13

4-Apr-06 8:13

viperlogic wrote:
Does "delete pThread" call ExitThread??

No. At the point in which you are deleting pThread, the thread has already terminated. You are just cleaning up the CWinThread object.

ExitThread() is called from within the secondary thread, unlike TerminateThread() which is called from outside the secondary thread.

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

viperlogic4-Apr-06 10:19

4-Apr-06 10:19

i think i have that working now.

A kind of related problem i have is with the code below. This is a part of the code the thread executes, if sucessful all is ok. this thread has a timeout of 3secs. A problem is that the ConnectServer call below takes 2minutes to complete if it cant connect. when this happens the below messagebox pops ups and then the program crashes. is it crashing because the code wants to "return" but there is nothing to return to as the thread has been already killed?? How can i modify it so that it wont crash. A message box doesnt have to be displayed either.

many thanks

<br />
	hres = pLoc_test->ConnectServer(<br />
		_bstr_t(L"\\\\"+strIP1+"\\root\\cimv2"),		// Object path of WMI namespace<br />
        NULL,												// User name. NULL = current user<br />
        NULL,												// User password. NULL = current<br />
        0,													// Locale. NULL indicates current<br />
        WBEM_FLAG_CONNECT_USE_MAX_WAIT,						// Security flags<br />
        0,													// Authority        <br />
        0,													// Context object <br />
        &pSvc_test												// pointer to IWbemServices proxy<br />
        );<br />
<br />
    <br />
    if (FAILED(hres))<br />
    {<br />
       	char error_msg[64];<br />
		sprintf(error_msg, "wmi_test: Could not connect. Error code = 0x%x", hres);<br />
		MessageBox(error_msg , "Error" , MB_ICONERROR | MB_OK);<br />
<br />
        pLoc_test->Release();     <br />
        return;    	<br />
    }<br />

David Crow4-Apr-06 10:37

4-Apr-06 10:37

Since you are using WBEM_FLAG_CONNECT_USE_MAX_WAIT, why not set your WaitForSingleObject() call to also wait for 2 minutes (or a little more)?

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

viperlogic4-Apr-06 10:41

4-Apr-06 10:41

i am scanning alot of hosts with this app, waiting 2mins for every host would take for ever to scan the network, hence i use the thread timeout of 3secs

i just read about _endthread and it appears to work so far. is this a proper solution?

David Crow4-Apr-06 11:02

hackers delight, how to parse all compbinations

4-Apr-06 11:02

viperlogic wrote:
i am scanning alot of hosts with this app, waiting 2mins for every host would take for ever to scan the network, hence i use the thread timeout of 3secs

I did something very similar to this in a ping-type application. For each machine that I was going to ping, I just created a secondary thread and put the ping-related code in it. Given that the machines each responded in their own time, the threads all completed at different times; some were instantaneous while others took a lot longer. If your UI has some sort of listbox or list control for these machines, give them a default status of "Establishing connection. Please wait...". When that machine's thread terminates, replace the default status with what actually happened.

viperlogic wrote:
i just read about _endthread and it appears to work so far. is this a proper solution?

Not unless you also used _beginthread(). Regardless, it is called from within the secondary thread. Terminating a thread from within itself is vastly different than terminating a thread from some other thread.

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

TreeView_CreateDragImage

Luther Baker4-Apr-06 5:01

Luther Baker

4-Apr-06 5:01

I am implementing a Drag and Drop operation on a TreeView. I've supplied a bitmap to my tree and it draws wonderfully.

Now, when the user begins dragging - I call TreeView_CreateDragImage ... and for the most part, it works except that the dragging image (a folder) overlaps the textual part of the drag so that when you are draggin and move the mouse around, you can't see the first few characters of the TreeView node's text in the dragging image.

I can't see how to affect this. Are my bitmaps too large? I initially supplied a bitmap strip 128x16 and told the TreeView the images were 16x16. I've move the hotspot around in TreeView_BeginDrag ... For the most part, CreateDragImage is a black box - it just creates the draggable image. I've no idea how to affect the placement of the text relative to the image.

Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance,

-Luther

9ine4-Apr-06 4:55

Re: hackers delight, how to parse all compbinations

4-Apr-06 4:55

I need to fill in numbers with all possible configurations of defined string length:

say choose string length N=5
and get all combinations from 00000 ... 99999

and so for any chosen N for the code to be universal

give some code please

9ine

David Crow4-Apr-06 5:01

Re: hackers delight, how to parse all compbinations

4-Apr-06 5:01

9ine wrote:
and get all combinations from 00000 ... 99999

Can you not just use a for/while loop?

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

9ine4-Apr-06 5:05

Re: hackers delight, how to parse all compbinations

4-Apr-06 5:05

I need to go to sleep...

yes I see looping thru 00000 ... 99999 is equal to scrolling thru all combinations Smile | :)

9ine

toxcct4-Apr-06 5:11

toxcct

4-Apr-06 5:11

you have the maximum number for the combination like that :

long lMax = 0;
CString str = /*...*/;
for (int i = 1; i < str.GetLength(); i++) {
    lMax += 9 * ::pow(10, i);
}

then, you iterator from 0 to lMax...

Re: hackers delight, how to parse all compbinations

9ine4-Apr-06 5:36

Re: hackers delight, how to parse all compbinations

4-Apr-06 5:36

Sorry sorry I have awaken and realized ...
I need to code the parsing of:
given the number of dimensions N
say N=6
and given the maximum number of single dimension size
say a,b,c,d,e,f a=300,b=100,c=400,....

to parse thru all possible combinations of them
from 0,0,0,0,0,0
1,0,0,0,0,0
2,0,0,0,0,0
...
...
a,b,c,d,e,f

the total number of combinations will be a*b*c*d*e*f

9ine

9ine4-Apr-06 6:25