C / C++ / MFC

Re: how to create a application without showing .exe in taskbar in C++

10-Jun-09 1:38

What kind of application are you developing and why should it not be listed in the task manager?

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

_AnsHUMAN_ 10-Jun-09 1:42

_AnsHUMAN_

10-Jun-09 1:42

it's not task manager! it's task bar....

You need to google first, if you have "It's urgent please" mentioned in your question.
Wink | ;-)

_AnShUmAn_

Re: how to create a application without showing .exe in taskbar in C++ [modified]

Rajesh R Subramanian10-Jun-09 1:46

Re: how to create a application without showing .exe in taskbar in C++

10-Jun-09 1:46

I noticed he mentioned "task bar". But I'm assuming that he intended to say task manager, because the query was "How to create ... without showing .EXE" and not "... without showing a window in my taskbar".

Again, that's an assumption. Let the OP defend for himself and we'll know what he's trying to achieve.

[added] My guess was right. He just posted another query asking how to hide his crapware from being displayed in the task manager. [/added]

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

modified on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:13 AM

_AnsHUMAN_ 10-Jun-09 1:43

_AnsHUMAN_

10-Jun-09 1:43

How To Hide A Window in TaskBar[^] and you will find a lot more articles on this topic, only if you are interested in searching

You need to google first, if you have "It's urgent please" mentioned in your question.
Wink | ;-)

_AnShUmAn_

how to save 2d vector into another 3dvector

Member 62745949-Jun-09 23:28

Member 6274594

9-Jun-09 23:28

I wrote an application where 2d vector contains pixel values in form of 0's and 1's.now i want to save this vector into 3d vectors in same way i want to store no. of 2d vectors into 3d vector so anyone knows this plz help me

CPallini9-Jun-09 23:51

9-Jun-09 23:51

Could you elaborate a bit (possibly an example...)?
Smile | :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke

[My articles]

Rajesh R Subramanian10-Jun-09 0:19

10-Jun-09 0:19

Looks like we *still* need facts. Smile | :)

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

CPallini10-Jun-09 0:25

10-Jun-09 0:25

Yes.

ali kanju10-Jun-09 0:52

ali kanju

10-Jun-09 0:52

it looks u people need a lot of facts Big Grin | :-D

Code-o-mat10-Jun-09 1:09

Code-o-mat

10-Jun-09 1:09

Maybe they should build a factory. Smile | :)

> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. <
> Life: great graphics, but the gameplay sux. <

molesworth10-Jun-09 1:22

molesworth

10-Jun-09 1:22

Code-o-mat wrote:
Maybe they should build a factory.

Or in this case a vectory... Poke tongue | ;-P

There are three kinds of people in the world - those who can count and those who can't...

ali kanju10-Jun-09 1:28

ali kanju

10-Jun-09 1:28

yeah i agree with both ov u.. Big Grin | :-D

CPallini10-Jun-09 1:42

Can using "CSingleLock::Lock" slow down low priority threads?

10-Jun-09 1:42

Well, since we are fashionable developers, we have a Class Factory... Big Grin | :-D

modified on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:49 AM

LetsMond9-Jun-09 23:09

LetsMond

9-Jun-09 23:09

I have a complex application with many background threads running and I use "CSingleLock::Lock" extensively to lock access to critical data.

I recently noticed a bug where one of my threads was running very slowly and making one of the application's operations almost unusable. After much debugging, I narrowed it down to the thread's repeated use of "CSingleLock::Lock" which is used (along with a CMutex member variable) to lock out some critical data to stop it being used by a different thread, in a different function, at the same time.

My first (obvious) thought was that this second thread was locking the mutex and so causing my original thread to slow down (even though, due to how the threads are used, it is highly unlikely that they will need to access the data at the same time). However I did extensive tests to prove that this was not the case, including stopping the second thread and making sure that my original thread is the only one using the mutex.

It seems that just calling "CSingleLock::Lock" is enough to slow my thread down, regardless of whether the mutex is locked by another thread.

The thread's priority is 0. If I change this to 1 then the problem does not happen. It also only happens on single core PCs.

Has anybody out there encountered a similar issue when using low priority threads?
Is this a common feature of multithreading which I just haven’t seen before?

Re: Can using "CSingleLock::Lock" slow down low priority threads?

Rajesh R Subramanian9-Jun-09 23:47

Re: Can using "CSingleLock::Lock" slow down low priority threads?

9-Jun-09 23:47

Ever since I read this[^] and was able to reproduce some of the issues listed, I stopped using MFC synchronization classes (years ago) and haven't looked back.

Not that I'm providing this as a solution to your query, but using the Win32 APIs directly for synchronization works sweetly enough for me. You might want to consider. Smile | :)

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

LetsMond10-Jun-09 0:58

LetsMond

10-Jun-09 0:58

Thank you, very interesting.

I'm moving on to C++/CLI programming in MsDev 2008 soon. Do you know of any similar problems with the equivalent .NET synchronisation classes (e.g. Mutex) ?

Re: Can using "CSingleLock::Lock" slow down low priority threads?

Rajesh R Subramanian10-Jun-09 1:06

Re: Can using "CSingleLock::Lock" slow down low priority threads?

10-Jun-09 1:06

I don't pretend to be a .NET expert, but I can almost certainly say that you won't face such issues (as listed in the article by Joe) with .NET. I say it because everything is taken care of by the framework for you (how it does internally is another thing) and it's pretty impossible to shoot yourself in the foot with .NET.

Unfortunately, that doesn't stop a programmer from writing bad code and therefore, a badly formed, bloated, etc., program is possible to write. So, if you use a synchronization object improperly, expect the program to be slow. Things like memory damage, memory/resource leak, memory fragmentation, etc., are impossible though (I chose C# over C++ for a couple of server programs that I wrote for this reason).

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

Stuart Dootson10-Jun-09 0:40

Stuart Dootson

10-Jun-09 0:40

LetsMond wrote:
It seems that just calling "CSingleLock::Lock" is enough to slow my thread down, regardless of whether the mutex is locked by another thread.

Locking a mutex is quite an expensive operation, even if the lock operation is immediately successful. In addition, the lock attempt (using, for example, WaitForSingleObject) is a kernel synchronisation point, which allows higher priority threads to take over the thread's time slice. Sounds like this is what's happening?

Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

Re: Can using "CSingleLock::Lock" slow down low priority threads?

Randor 10-Jun-09 5:54

Randor

10-Jun-09 5:54

LetsMond wrote:

Has anybody out there encountered a similar issue when using low priority threads?

Absolutely.

LetsMond wrote:

Is this a common feature of multithreading which I just haven’t seen before?

You will probably get better performance using the Interlocked Functions[^] rather than the CSingleLock class[^]. In high-performance threads you need to avoid synchronization with kernel objects.

Note that all synchronization techniques are relatively expensive because all of them use a memory barrier[^] which essentially means that are using SFENCE [^]or MFENCE[^] instructions to serialize memory access.

Best Wishes,
-David Delaune

How to add a prefix and a postfix to CEdit-derived class?

Yaumen9-Jun-09 22:05

Yaumen

9-Jun-09 22:05

How to add a CEdit-derived class output the text/icon in the beginning and-or in the end of CEdit window.
I can allocate an area for the text/icon by SetMargins method, but in what method and how is better output a text or icon not clearly.
It is desirable, that other CEdit functional was not broken

Similar to CEdit from Data group and MsgID groups (http://www.canusb.com/canusb_labview.jpg[^])

Re: How to add a prefix and a postfix to CEdit-derived class?

«_Superman_»9-Jun-09 23:17

«_Superman_»

9-Jun-09 23:17

You will need an owner draw edit control.
Here is a reference on how it is done. - How to change the back color of an edit box when it gets the focus[^]

«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.

copy chinese to edit control caption will happen garbled text how to solve it

jeansea9-Jun-09 21:15

jeansea

9-Jun-09 21:15

hi guys

i try copy some chinese word "你好" from a .txt file as edit control's caption

but i fail.it show some garbled text

how to solve this problem

could help me

thank you;

Smile | :)

Re: copy chinese to edit control caption will happen garbled text how to solve it

Rajesh R Subramanian9-Jun-09 21:57

Re: copy chinese to edit control caption will happen garbled text how to solve it

9-Jun-09 21:57

Hi,

What do you mean by it fails? The garbled text is in Chinese or not? If not Chinese, do you see question marks instead? Is your application fully Unicode?

It is a crappy thing, but it's life -^ Carlo Pallini

CPallini9-Jun-09 22:03