Click here to Skip to main content
15,923,168 members
Home / Discussions / C / C++ / MFC
   

C / C++ / MFC

 
AnswerRe: After SuspendThread Messagebox not working. Pin
Rajesh R Subramanian26-Aug-09 0:27
professionalRajesh R Subramanian26-Aug-09 0:27 
QuestionTCP/IP Message Framing and Parsing [modified] Pin
staticv26-Aug-09 0:13
staticv26-Aug-09 0:13 
AnswerRe: TCP/IP Message Framing and Parsing Pin
Stuart Dootson26-Aug-09 3:43
professionalStuart Dootson26-Aug-09 3:43 
GeneralRe: TCP/IP Message Framing and Parsing Pin
staticv26-Aug-09 17:16
staticv26-Aug-09 17:16 
GeneralRe: TCP/IP Message Framing and Parsing Pin
Stuart Dootson26-Aug-09 21:20
professionalStuart Dootson26-Aug-09 21:20 
GeneralRe: TCP/IP Message Framing and Parsing Pin
Moak26-Aug-09 21:22
Moak26-Aug-09 21:22 
GeneralRe: TCP/IP Message Framing and Parsing Pin
staticv26-Aug-09 21:40
staticv26-Aug-09 21:40 
QuestionNo Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
thomasIC26-Aug-09 0:04
thomasIC26-Aug-09 0:04 
AnswerRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
«_Superman_»26-Aug-09 0:51
professional«_Superman_»26-Aug-09 0:51 
GeneralRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
thomasIC26-Aug-09 1:08
thomasIC26-Aug-09 1:08 
GeneralRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
«_Superman_»26-Aug-09 2:03
professional«_Superman_»26-Aug-09 2:03 
GeneralRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
thomasIC26-Aug-09 2:30
thomasIC26-Aug-09 2:30 
GeneralRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
David Crow26-Aug-09 3:00
David Crow26-Aug-09 3:00 
GeneralRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
thomasIC26-Aug-09 3:14
thomasIC26-Aug-09 3:14 
QuestionRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
David Crow26-Aug-09 3:18
David Crow26-Aug-09 3:18 
AnswerRe: No Word Wrap at CR or LF or CRLF Pin
thomasIC26-Aug-09 3:44
thomasIC26-Aug-09 3:44 
QuestionDirectx Pin
messages25-Aug-09 23:44
messages25-Aug-09 23:44 
AnswerRe: Directx Pin
Stuart Dootson26-Aug-09 3:50
professionalStuart Dootson26-Aug-09 3:50 
AnswerRe: Directx Pin
Stuart Dootson26-Aug-09 5:15
professionalStuart Dootson26-Aug-09 5:15 
Questionbyte to int -> bit shifting confusion [modified] Pin
Souldrift25-Aug-09 21:31
Souldrift25-Aug-09 21:31 
AnswerRe: byte to int -> bit shifting confusion Pin
CPallini25-Aug-09 21:40
mveCPallini25-Aug-09 21:40 
GeneralRe: byte to int -> bit shifting confusion Pin
Souldrift25-Aug-09 21:43
Souldrift25-Aug-09 21:43 
AnswerRe: byte to int -> bit shifting confusion Pin
Stuart Dootson25-Aug-09 22:11
professionalStuart Dootson25-Aug-09 22:11 
The reason you generally want to and with 0xff is to ensure that when your byte is promoted to int (as it will be internally in the expression), it is zero-extended, i.e. the top 24 bits of the int are set to zero, not one. Why would they be set to one? Basically if the language sign-extends the byte when it makes it an int AND the top bit of the byte is set.

Now, if you use 'unsigned char' for BYTE and 'unsigned int', you should be OK. If you used 'signed char' for BYTE, then you could have issues.

Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

GeneralRe: byte to int -> bit shifting confusion Pin
Souldrift25-Aug-09 22:23
Souldrift25-Aug-09 22:23 
QuestionMinimize Mainframe in SDI Pin
kiranin25-Aug-09 21:18
kiranin25-Aug-09 21:18 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.