|
Check out IMAPI from MS (XP and later). You can find it here[^]
Alcohol. The cause of, and the solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
|
Thx, I checked it out, but I can't find SDK for downloading it!
I need IMAPIv1 because I'm running on XP! I'm also wondering is it possible to copy data on DVD? According to msdn it is not possible to do so, only using IMAPIv2 which requires Vista???
If anybody knows solution for this (not using Nero SDK or similarly) please let me know how.
Thanks to all
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's in the platform SDK.
But you are correct, version 1 can't burn DVD.
I don't know of any other alternatives.
Alcohol. The cause of, and the solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean the February 2003 version (which is a latest windows SDK that supports Visual Studio 6.0?)or you mean new Windows SDK (Date Published: 8/24/2006, combining of the Platform SDK, .NET Framework SDK, and WinFX SDKs)?
Or could you post link, please.
THX!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
I am currently using VC++ 6.0 and Crystal Reports 8.5. I have placed a Crystal Report Viewer in my dialog box, i dont understand how to populate it with a report at run time. I tried finding the features this tool offers but was not able to find any solution to my problem.
I kindly request anyone of you to provide me the information to make it happen.
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
Sandy
|
|
|
|
|
I am facing a problem in copying file in C:\windows\fonts folder in vista computer. my application is properly working on other machine but in vista i dont receive any error message but my file is not copying.can anyone give me solution y it is so
Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN
|
|
|
|
|
Shilpi Boosar wrote: copying file in C:\windows\fonts
How are you copying the file to the destination?
Shilpi Boosar wrote: my application is properly working on other machine but in vista i dont receive any error message but my file is not copying
Did you try and check by debugging what is happening behind your code? If not, please try it out.
Somethings seem HARD to do, until we know how to do them.
 _AnShUmAn_
|
|
|
|
|
yes i debug it properly and i dont find any exception in opening and writing a file. and it will properly working on Common folder in vista like C:\
but not in C:\windows\fonts.
i import ttf file using resource and just copy and paste that file to fonts folder.
Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN
|
|
|
|
|
Try to login in Pure Admin user and then see. I hope it will work definitely.
Try it.
|
|
|
|
|
I have full rights but it is not working 
Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have the following function
int DataPeakCompareFunc(const void *el1, const void *el2)
{
const DataPeak *peak1 = reinterpret_cast<const datapeak="" *="">(el1);
const DataPeak *peak2 = reinterpret_cast<const datapeak="" *="">(el2);
if (peak1->position < peak2->position)
{
return -1;
}
else if (peak2->position < peak1->position)
{
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
I am calling qsort function with the below parameters
qsort((void *)pScan, num_readings, sizeof(DataPeak), DataPeakCompareFunc);
Then i am getting the above error.
What to do?
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
subramanyeswari wrote: qsort((void *)pScan, num_readings, sizeof(DataPeak), DataPeakCompareFunc);
qsort((void *)pScan, num_readings, sizeof(DataPeak), <code>&</code>DataPeakCompareFunc);
Remember that this function should not be member function. Either it should be static or a global function.
Lookup qsort. Here is the callback function signature.
int (__cdecl *compare )(const void *elem1, const void *elem2 ) BTW why are you posting the whole error as caption for your post. Looks odd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I swear I already answered this. I'll repeat:
Don't use qsort: it's crap, old, not type safe, etc....
Use STL instead. Here's an example:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <algorithm>
class CData
{
public:
CData(int val) : m_val(val) {}
friend bool operator<(const CData &l, const CData &r)
{
return l.m_val < r.m_val;
}
private:
int m_val;
};
int main(int arvc, char* argv[])
{
CData SortMe[] = {10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1};
CData *pOnePastEnd = SortMe + sizeof(SortMe)/sizeof(SortMe[0]);
std::sort(SortMe, pOnePastEnd);
return 0;
}
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Hewitt wrote: Don't use qsort: not type safe, etc....
What do you mean by type safe? We are ones who's using it and we know what types we are passing to it. So how can you say it's not type safe.
Stephen Hewitt wrote: old,
Old is gold.
Stephen Hewitt wrote: it's crap
No it's not.
|
|
|
|
|
STL is obviously simpler, easier to understand and less messier than qsort can ever be. STL code would execute faster than the routines that we may generally write. Did you notice the STL code to sort a given array? That is 1 line! Brilliant use of operator overloading. If you are writing c++ code, I don't find a good reason to use qsort, instead of STL.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
brahmma wrote: If you are writing c++ code, I don't find a good reason to use qsort, instead of STL.
That doesn't mean qsort is crap and not type safe. If you are using it, then you have reasons. It's just a function call, I've used it, works well.
My company does not use STL. So qsort works well.
|
|
|
|
|
Nibu babu thomas wrote: That doesn't mean qsort is crap
Why do you tell that to *me* 
Nibu babu thomas wrote: It's just a function call, I've used it, works well.
It works; I never said no. I was trying to compare qsort with an STL based solution. I felt when compared, STL is much better. My point is that if STL could be used instead of qsort, it must be, IMO!!
PS: I'm not voting you one.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
brahmma wrote: Why do you tell that to *me*
I've quoted the statement to which I am replying. 
|
|
|
|
|
Nibu babu thomas wrote: That doesn't mean qsort is crap and not type safe. If you are using it, then you have reasons. It's just a function call, I've used it, works well.
There is no sane reason to use qsort in preference to std::sort in C++ code; it's (std::sort) better in every respect from type safety through to sorting speed and flexibility.
Nibu babu thomas wrote: My company does not use STL. So qsort works well.
Your company is making an error of judgment in this respect. If I was in charge the person responsible for this would have a lot of explaining to do.
Remember the mantra:
qsort is crap!
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Nibu babu thomas wrote: Old is gold.
You must use Windows 3.11 :->
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
Nibu babu thomas wrote: No it's not.
It is; 100% crap.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Nibu babu thomas wrote: What do you mean by type safe? We are ones who's using it and we know what types we are passing to it. So how can you say it's not type safe.
Look at the sorting callback; it uses reinterpret_casts to recover type information which was discarded in the call to qsort (with the conversion to void*)! If that doesn't scream out for a better solution then I don't know what does. If the elements sorted were changed to a different type but the callback wasn't adjusted it will still compile and run but the reinterpret_casts in the callback will result in strange runtime errors: this is one way in which the fact that qsort is not type safe can cause maintenance problems.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from that, every time you use qsort, god kills a kitten.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
