|
Nave,
I just wanted to let you know what a joy the ShellExecute is.
I used c:\a b c\ as the default directory and I separated out the command from the parameters.
In system it was all one big mess and the exe file got confused.
With ShellExecute everything works like a charm.
Thanks again for your generous help,
Ilan
|
|
|
|
|
IlanTal wrote: Thanks again for your generous help,
You are welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
I've run into a new problem.
ShellExecute launches the program and then returns.
I need the results of the program so I need to know when the program is finished.
It turns out that system() returns only after the program has finished.
Is there any obvious way to know the program has finished?
Thanks,
Ilan
|
|
|
|
|
in that case use the ShellExecuteEx() function. in that function you will get the handle of the new process. so after calling the ShellExecuteEx() function wait for the handle using the WaitForSingleObject() function.
|
|
|
|
|
Once again, thanks for your help.
When I ran things under the debugger, I looked at the directories, saw what files there were, saw how they were created, and I was happy that everything was working.
When I let it go, I realized I still had a problem.
Your help has been extremely useful.
Ilan
|
|
|
|
|
My application is up and running at full speed.
Thanks again,
Ilan
|
|
|
|
|
IlanTal wrote: My application is up and running at full speed.
congrads 
|
|
|
|
|
your problem is because the \ character is understood as the escapment character, so, to "output" a \, you must type '\\' :
buff = "c:\\Program Files\\myDir\\myProg"
BTW, prefer avoid using the ::system() CRT function because it is not totaly safe.
use it ::Shellexecute() or ::CreateProcess() instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Can anybody please tell me the difference between debug-build and release build....
thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
haacked.com/archive/2004/02/14/difference-between-debug-vs-release-build.aspx
http://www.codeguru.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-269905.html
Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN
|
|
|
|
|
Debug and Release are for building your project with different configurations.Sometimes you use of Debug mode for debugging your project while Release mode is final build of your program for users.Debug mode contain additional data and symbols to aid debugging but Relase mode optimizations your code without extra debug data.
|
|
|
|
|
See here[^].
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
For example you can use the DEBUG mode to check manually if the code is correctly working, to do this you can use some useful macros as ASSERT() or TRACE().
During compile of the RELEASE version that lines are jumped.
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
In debug mode, most optimizations are turned off
In debug mode, Str Library allocates more memory than strictly needed and attempts to detect buffer overwrite and stray pointer issues
In debug mode, when thread safety is also enabled, Str Library makes sure that for non-MT-marked objects, only the creator thread attempts modify operations
In debug mode, several unusual conditions that represent programming errors are checked in the code and an ASSERT-ion is thrown if a bad state is detected.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible for me to create text-to-speech application for my own language(right to left).
plz help me out the basic steps.
|
|
|
|
|
yah sure,
long back, i have seen somebody using such active X control in vb. i will also try it out.
|
|
|
|
|
Why not?
The 'right to left' mode is only related to the draw function of the control where you put/get the strings.
Then simply you have only to give the strings to the TTS-dll.
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
TanX for reppling!
Sir!
can u tell me wether i'll need phonetic transcription or not.
if yes then plz guide me.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I haven't used TTS before for that problem.
A good example to how start to use the APIs is this[^], and in this site you can find many other example; try to see if someone has developed something for the 'right to left' lenguages.
good luck;)
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
I have some list view that i hold in it item.
I want to change the space between the items in the table and the text - in some cases i want to change it to be with bigger space and in some cases i want to change it to be with no space at all.
How to do it ?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm not familiar with the variable-argument lists in C. And I want to
define a function similar to fprintf() and relay the paramater list to
it, I'm using the code similar to the following:
// helper function to direct TRACE output to file
void TraceToFile(const char *format, ...)
{
static FILE *fp;
// ...
va_list(arglist);
va_start(arglist, format);
fprintf(fp, format, arglist);
}
but the result seems to be incorrect. Anybody can help me on this?
Thanks.
Max
|
|
|
|
|
Just replace the fprintf() with vfprintf()
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much, Roger Broomfield.
It now works.
My implementation is as this:
in stdafx.h:
#define _TRACE_RELEASE_
#ifndef _DEBUG
#ifdef _TRACE_RELEASE_
#undef TRACE
#define TRACE TraceToFile
#endif
#endif //!_DEBUG
in one cpp file, I add this:
//--------------------------------------------------------
class CTraceFile
{
FILE *fp_;
public:
CTraceFile()
{
fp_ = fopen("c:/Trace.txt", "w");
ASSERT(fp);
}
~CTraceFile() { if(fp_) fclose(fp_); }
FILE *operator()() const { return fp_; }
};
// helper function to direct TRACE output to file
void TraceToFile(const char *format, ...)
{
static CTraceFile tf;
va_list arglist;
va_start(arglist, format);
vfprintf(tf(), format, arglist);
va_end(arglist);
fflush(tf());
}
//========================================================
Then I can view the TRACE output in file c:\Trace.txt for
release build, if macro _TRACE_RELEASE_ is defined.
Thanks.
Max
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking to maximize my speed while reading a binary file - the file contains a mix of floats & ints(4bytes each) and occasional strings. Floats and ints are converted to the correct endianess post read using bit shifts and masks.
I've fine tuned everything I can think of for reading the file, but have not previously considered changing the interface to the file. I am currently using FILE * with the associated fread, seek etc. functions for no better reason than this being what my original C code used (this entire app is now ported to VC++ with MFC). Is there a faster file reader I should consider? Any speed increase would help, as I am reading 100's of megs of data.
Thanks for any opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
try CreateFile() API
Please chk http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-US/library/aa363858.aspx
AJay
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
