|
Iain Clarke wrote: Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
Am I missing some thing???
|
|
|
|
|
Naveen wrote: Am I missing some thing???
Yep![^]
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I was wondering how long it would take someone to notice...
In joke for regulars. The link for context has already been given to you.
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent. - CPallini
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Clarke wrote: Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent. - CPallini
And what was the context for "Iain Clarke appears because CPallini still cares."??? I noticed that one also...
|
|
|
|
|
I got fed up with some "plz help hmwrk" questions, so decided to retire from the board for a few days. My replies were getting a bit rant-y... And our CP pursuaded me to stay. So the sig have varied occasionally.
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Clarke wrote: Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
Iain Clarke wrote:xxx CMyClass::XXX ()
Iain abuz porn, plz plz very urgent, plz...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
ROTFL.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It could be worse... It could be your new sig...
After I posted that, I did kinda regret using X... But I thought I used four - so that's abusing australian beer!
Iain.
Plz sir... CPallini CPallini abuz drugz, plz plz help urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Clarke wrote: But I thought I used four
You used five and six (beers of course).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Name collision? Try to rename it OnMyTimer . If it doesn't help, please provide the context of your TIMERPROC declaration (i.e. is it a method?).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Kindly please let me know how to get started to create log file in C. I have to create a dll utility that should create a particular formatted logs. Please give me and idea to go about it.
Thnks in advance
modified on Friday, April 18, 2008 3:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Please be more specific on your problem/difficulty: Aren't you able to create a file and write to it?
Aren't you able to build a DLL ? Are you using MFC or WIN32 ?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply.
I am able to make a DLL file. Using VC++. I have log file which I have to rebuild it into a new format. It uses Multithreading, Mutex's and all. I wanted to know how do I start on it to create a new program that make a DLL file. This DLL file should be able to create the newly formatted log files.
Kindly please let me know regarding this.
|
|
|
|
|
pl_kode wrote: I am able to make a DLL file.
pl_kode wrote: I wanted to know how do I start on it to create a new program that make a DLL file. .
I think the above are quite opposite sentences. Please elaborate.
Making a new DLL project with Visual Studio is straightforward.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Yes Making a new DLL projects in VC++. You are right.
apologize for that
|
|
|
|
|
pl_kode wrote: apologize for that
Oh, you haven't to. Good luck with your multithreaded log DLL.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats one of finest log file class i ever seen! even thats thread safe! how's life going hamid.
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/codeProject$$>
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks not bad, did you have a good week.
|
|
|
|
|
yeah great week end i am expecting
|
|
|
|
|
ThatsAlok wrote: yeah great week end i am expecting
Because you are good man.
|
|
|
|
|
try searching codeproject for LogFile classes, there are load of classes available for you.. find your self best class which suited your need!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/codeProject$$>
|
|
|
|
|
In the program below if i try to convert derived class pointer to base with '=' operator overloaded the overloaded operator is not considered. Can somebody please explain what is wrong in the below code?
class base
{
// dummy
};
class Derived : public base
{
public:
Derived* operator= (base* aBase)
{
return (Derived*) aBase;
}
};
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
base* bb = new Derived;
Derived* dd = bb; // Compilation error C2440
return 0;
}
|
|
|
|
|
You can't do that. This opposite is possible (casting from a derived class to a base class).
You have to use a dynamic_cast:
Derived* dd = dynamic_cast(base*)<bb>;
Not sure why you would like to do that in this context though.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that you shouldn't convert. But in derived class i have overloaded '=' operator which takes base pointer as argument and explicitly converts it to derived pointer. Still the compiler is throwing an error. Is anything wrong in the overloaded operator?
Actually i am trying to write a linked list to store any data type in one list. So i have a data class (a template class) which is derived from a dummy base class. Each node has a pointer of base class storing derived class object. So while retreiving i will cast base class pointer to detived with template argument(e.g derived<t>*) by overloading = operator in derived class.
|
|
|
|