|
|
Cool, Rajesh!
Sorry for the confusion, I want to use MD5 API provided by Microsoft and less dependent on 3rd parties things, so I should use "Windows Crypto API", correct?
(Since I am writing native C++ code, I want the API to be native code as well.)
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/security/cryptest.aspx[^]
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
[^] balanced.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks pal.
Some people just don't have a sense of humour.
Many are stubborn in pursuit of the path they have chosen, few in pursuit of the goal - Friedrich Nietzsche
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
[Microsoft MVP - Visual C++]
|
|
|
|
|
Try a bit more [^].
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you see this article and compile it?
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry no compiler at hand, just writing a document and doing some survey on this computer.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
You can compile it without any probme.(of course for me.  )
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your advice, Hamid!
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure I got you.
IMHO you should use the Windows Cryptographic (i.e. native) API (the same article's author used).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks CPallini,
Question answered.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
When I view my application exe in the task manager, the value below the "Mem Usage" under process tab keeps on increasing at the rate of 40 k to 60 k each time. for eg initially When i run my application exe, it showed 3096 k and gradually increased to 26136 k after 40 minutes. Anyone tell me, Whats the cause for this problem and how can i avoid this?
Anu
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly memory leak. I.e you might have allocated some memory using the functions such as new or malloc, but didn't free it using the delete or free().. Review your code..
|
|
|
|
|
Probably you'll not be releasing the memories allocated. which may cause memory leaks. You can profile your application with tools bounds checker to detect the memory leak.
other handy tools like Leak Diag[^] and Visual Leak detector[^] can be used as well.
Before applying any tools, you've to cross check your source with memory allocation and correspondnig de allocation. Also have to check for dangling and orphan memory allocations(assigning new memory location to a pointer without releasing the existing one).
YOu can also seek help from Crt Debug libraries to get information about memory leak. Please check this post.[^]
-Sarath.
"Great hopes make everything great possible" - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you know, the Universe is expanding...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
You better suggest him to find his memory leaks. 
Laughing over somebodies bugs isnt so funny. 
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
KarstenK wrote: You better suggest him to find his memory leaks.
Some people already did (very well indeed).
KarstenK wrote: Laughing over somebodies bugs isnt so funny.
I didn't intend to mock the OP, IMHO a bit of humour helps, sometimes.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
It seems you have a little problem with KarstenK.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. He kindly expressed his opinion and so did I.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Memory leak:maybe your problem is of pointers or graphic handles(can you more explain about your program).
|
|
|
|
|
Hey
I'm writing a small global hooking app that will intercept all the WM_COPY messages.
So, I read and found an article about "using hooks" in MSDN:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms644960(VS.85).aspx[^] (pretty good article!)
It says in the article:
"You must place a global hook procedure in a DLL separate from the application installing the hook procedure."
That is, in SetWindowsHookEx() I must pass the DLL I loaded and the address of the function.
And I don't really understand why is that.
Why can't I just give a pointer to a function in my application?
I guess that it is because threads from other processes cannot access my application, but they can access a DLL I loaded to the memory from my application.
Can someone take a few minutes to explain the newbie ???
Thanks a lot in advance!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
