Click here to Skip to main content
15,918,243 members
Home / Discussions / C / C++ / MFC
   

C / C++ / MFC

 
AnswerRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
CPallini7-Jul-11 3:14
mveCPallini7-Jul-11 3:14 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Maximilien7-Jul-11 3:32
Maximilien7-Jul-11 3:32 
QuestionRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
CPallini7-Jul-11 10:27
mveCPallini7-Jul-11 10:27 
AnswerRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Niklas L7-Jul-11 20:46
Niklas L7-Jul-11 20:46 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
CPallini7-Jul-11 21:14
mveCPallini7-Jul-11 21:14 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Niklas L7-Jul-11 21:53
Niklas L7-Jul-11 21:53 
AnswerRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Maximilien8-Jul-11 2:55
Maximilien8-Jul-11 2:55 
AnswerRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Erudite_Eric7-Jul-11 22:33
Erudite_Eric7-Jul-11 22:33 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Stefan_Lang10-Jul-11 22:40
Stefan_Lang10-Jul-11 22:40 
GeneralRe: Pure virtual base class question Pin
Erudite_Eric10-Jul-11 22:43
Erudite_Eric10-Jul-11 22:43 
Questionoperator overloading problem....... Pin
gateway236-Jul-11 20:01
gateway236-Jul-11 20:01 
AnswerRe: operator overloading problem....... Pin
Niklas L6-Jul-11 21:11
Niklas L6-Jul-11 21:11 
GeneralRe: operator overloading problem....... Pin
Stefan_Lang7-Jul-11 23:58
Stefan_Lang7-Jul-11 23:58 
GeneralRe: operator overloading problem....... Pin
Niklas L8-Jul-11 1:06
Niklas L8-Jul-11 1:06 
AnswerRe: operator overloading problem....... Pin
JanakiramanElumalai7-Jul-11 4:09
JanakiramanElumalai7-Jul-11 4:09 
QuestionWhat are the basic benefits of using mmioxxxx “file” functions as opposed to “plain “ MFC CFile? Pin
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 13:34
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 13:34 
AnswerRe: What are the basic benefits of using mmioxxxx “file” functions as opposed to “plain “ MFC CFile? Pin
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:43
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:43 
GeneralRe: What are the basic benefits of using mmioxxxx “file” functions as opposed to “plain “ MFC CFile? Pin
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 15:43
Vaclav_6-Jul-11 15:43 
QuestionIOCP again Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 8:34
csrss6-Jul-11 8:34 
Hi guys. I am stuck again with IOCP again. The problem is that, i just cannot create more then one worker thread. If i'll create more then one worker thread, for example 10 and on the other side there are 10 client connections, everything crashes in a random places, or it crashes because buffer for WSARecv is not allocated while in debugger i can see perfectly allocated buffer, or it crashes because socket is invalid - i just dont get it. While it is only one thread - it is working perfectly, when there more threads, it becomes unstable, and when there are 10 or more, it crashes after 1 second. Is there some magic trick i am missing again?
Thanks
011011010110000101100011011010000110100101101110
0110010101110011

AnswerRe: IOCP again Pin
cmk6-Jul-11 10:38
cmk6-Jul-11 10:38 
AnswerRe: IOCP again Pin
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 10:56
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 10:56 
GeneralRe: IOCP again Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 11:11
csrss6-Jul-11 11:11 
QuestionThe code, in short Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 11:58
csrss6-Jul-11 11:58 
AnswerRe: The code, in short Pin
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:21
Mark Salsbery6-Jul-11 13:21 
GeneralRe: The code, in short Pin
csrss6-Jul-11 14:53
csrss6-Jul-11 14:53 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.