|
|
The MSDN docs say "The path can be specified as a Unicode string or a PIDL" for the BFFM_SETSELECTION message (inside a BrowseCallbackProc function after calling SHBrowseForFolder), but when I send a Unicode string instead of an ansi one it fails. Is the documentation wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Did you set the wParam as true?
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
yep, it works fine with an ansi string.
|
|
|
|
|
How are you sending the unicode string ? can you dump the section of code ?
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
if you uncomment the commented out lines it works fine in unicode builds but not ansi. it's being converted to unicode ok because OutputDebugStringW prints what it's supposed to.
int CALLBACK BrowseCallbackProc_SetInitFolder(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, LPARAM lParam, LPARAM lpData)
{
if (uMsg == BFFM_INITIALIZED)
{
SendMessage(hWnd, BFFM_SETSELECTION, TRUE, lpData);
}
return 0;
}
|
|
|
|
|
In Ansi build you should NOT convert the string to Unicode while using windows APIs,
Check this link[^] and search for BFFM_SETSELECTION
The Microsoft documentation has a couple of minor errors I should point out in case you try to program SHBrowseForFolder in C. The documentation says to pass the string for BFFM_SETOKTEXT in WPARAM; actually, it's LPARAM. It also says that BFFM_SETSELECTION requires a Unicode string, but BFFM_SETSELECTION is available in both A and W flavors, so you can use LPCTSTR.
-Prakash
-- modified at 23:38 Sunday 8th January, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Prakash wrote: The Microsoft documentation has a couple of minor errors
ah, thats what i thought. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
i was just wondering if this is possible?:
i have 2 class
and each of them i declared 10 object and 1 pointer:
grahpic_card gc[10],*ptr_gc;
mother_board mb[10],*ptr_mb;
is there a way i can store any one of the pointer in 1 pointer something like this
???? *ptr1;
instead of having to use 1 pointer for each of the class i would like to use 1 pointer for BOTH of the class is that possible if so please teach me how
|
|
|
|
|
You need some understanding of C++.
use a baseclass from which graphic_card and mother_board will be derived from.
for example
class Mother_board :public Base
and
class Graphic_card :public Base
Then
Base *base;
Mother_board *mBoard;
Graphic_card *gCard;
<<<assumeing that="" the="" mboard="" and="" gcard="" are="" initialed.="">>>
then
base = mBoard or <<< you can use reinterpret_cast too >>>
base = gCard is valid assignmnet.
add virtual or pure virtual methods in both base and derived class so that you can call the methods as base->foo();
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
reinterprit_cast
is the key word
but its not that simple
as u feel as c++ doesnot
like such type casting and
might lead u some error in
programe if reiterprit is not
used with proper cution .
Vikas Amin
Embin Technology
Bombay
vikas.amin@embin.com
|
|
|
|
|
dynamic_cast can be used for better safety.
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
The applicaiton is ok in Windows 2000.
When run in Windows Xp ,at the beginning there is a error which said the memory could not be visited.
I link WS2_32.LIB in the project.
Why?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
rushing wrote: The applicaiton is ok in Windows 2000.
Is it your application?
Is it memory exeception? if it is written by you can u identify the code from where the memory exception is raised?
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
I just realized the Point class does not provide the = operator. Now that I'm trying to actually use GDI+ in my apps, I'm finding the classes for Rect, RectF, Point, and PointF to be rather peculiar in design.
Also, Rect doesn't provide functions that return the endpoints.
I can't create an Array of Point and copy another Point into one of it's elements (unless it's during initialization). Instead, I have to resort to assigning the X and Y members explicitly into each array element.
I'm not sure if there is some bigger picture I'm missing here or some new highly ultra OOP paradigm I missed the whitepaper on or if this design is just weak and missing some of the useful operators that MFC provided on many of it's classes.
Does anyone have any insight concerning these omissions in some of the more basic classes like Point and Rect? My code just looks rather bloated copying the members individually like this so I thought maybe I'm doing it wrong.
Thanks in advance for any guidance.
-- modified at 21:59 Saturday 7th January, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
I want to build a win32 console program in VC .Net. I wrote one function in random1.h and random1.cpp, Then, I wrote my main program in SimMCMain.cpp which call this function from random1.h and random1.cpp. It's no problem in VC++ 6.0, but it always has problem when linking in VC.Net. Can anyone give me some suggestion? Thanks
****random1.h***
#ifndef RANDOM1_H
#define RANDOM1_H
double GetOneGaussianBySummation();
double GetOneGaussianByBoxMuller();
#endif
****random1.cpp****
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cmath>
// the basic math functions should be in namespace
// std but aren't in VCPP6
#if !defined(_MSC_VER)
using namespace std;
#endif
double GetOneGaussianBySummation()
{
double result=0;
for (unsigned long j=0; j < 12; j++)
result += rand()/static_cast<double>(RAND_MAX);
result -= 6.0;
return result;
}
double GetOneGaussianByBoxMuller()
{
double result;
double x;
double y;
double sizeSquared;
do
{
x = 2.0*rand()/static_cast<double>(RAND_MAX)-1;
y = 2.0*rand()/static_cast<double>(RAND_MAX)-1;
sizeSquared = x*x + y*y;
}
while
( sizeSquared >= 1.0);
result = x*sqrt(-2*log(sizeSquared)/sizeSquared);
return result;
}
****SimMCMain.cpp ****
// requires Random1.cpp
#include <Random1.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
double SimpleMonteCarlo1(double Expiry,
double Strike,
double Spot,
double Vol,
double r,
unsigned long NumberOfPaths)
{
double variance = Vol*Vol*Expiry;
double rootVariance = sqrt(variance);
double itoCorrection = -0.5*variance;
double movedSpot = Spot*exp(r*Expiry +itoCorrection);
double thisSpot;
double runningSum=0;
for (unsigned long i=0; i < NumberOfPaths; i++)
{
double thisGaussian = GetOneGaussianByBoxMuller();
thisSpot = movedSpot*exp( rootVariance*thisGaussian);
double thisPayoff = thisSpot - Strike;
thisPayoff = thisPayoff >0 ? thisPayoff : 0;
runningSum += thisPayoff;
}
double mean = runningSum / NumberOfPaths;
mean *= exp(-r*Expiry);
return mean;
}
int main()
{
double Expiry;
double Strike;
double Spot;
double Vol;
double r;
unsigned long NumberOfPaths;
cout << "\nEnter expiry\n";
cin >> Expiry;
cout << "\nEnter strike\n";
cin >> Strike;
cout << "\nEnter spot\n";
cin >> Spot;
cout << "\nEnter vol\n";
cin >> Vol;
cout << "\nr\n";
cin >> r;
cout << "\nNumber of paths\n";
cin >> NumberOfPaths;
double result = SimpleMonteCarlo1(Expiry,
Strike,
Spot,
Vol,
r,
NumberOfPaths);
cout <<"the price is " << result << "\n";
double tmp;
cin >> tmp;
return 0;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pierre,Hsieh wrote: but it always has problem when linking in VC.Net.
"You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03
"Obviously ??? You're definitely a superstar!!!" - mYkel - 21 Jun '04
"There's not enough blatant self-congratulatory backslapping in the world today..." - HumblePie - 21 Jun '05
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
SimpleMCMain1 error LNK2019 and
SimpleMCMain1 fatal error LNK1120
|
|
|
|
|
You really should supply more relevant information if you want useful help in solving your problem. Most people do not like playing "twenty questions" just to get enough information to help.
When the linker generates LNK2019 it gives you more info, what is the information given?
"You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03
"Obviously ??? You're definitely a superstar!!!" - mYkel - 21 Jun '04
"There's not enough blatant self-congratulatory backslapping in the world today..." - HumblePie - 21 Jun '05
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, Because my system is chinese version and this is my first time to ask question in web site, that's why I didn't provide more information. I checked this error message from MSDN web site.
LNK2019 : unresolved external symbol 'symbol' referenced in function 'function'
SimpleMCMain1 error LNK2019: 無法在外部之程式庫中找到或連結所需之資料型別或函式的符號 _main，於函式 _mainCRTStartup 中參考
LNK1120 : number unresolved externals
SimpleMCMain1 fatal error LNK1120: 1 個無法在外部程式庫中找到或連結所需之資料型別或函式
|
|
|
|
|
What is SimpleMCMain1? It's not shown anywhere in your code.
Are you creating a CRT application? The LNK2019 linker error might be resolved by changing "Minimize CRT Use in ATL" to "No". Go to Project Properties / Configuration Properties / General. Does that help?
"The words of God are not like the oak leaf which dies and falls to the earth, but like the pine tree which stays green forever." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
The application that I am currently developing is attempting to programmatically control an external application by simulating mouse clicks in it's various windows. I have managed to produce the context menu on the external application by simulating a RH mouse click (using PostMessage's with WM_RBUTTONDOWN / WM_RBUTTONUP). I can also execute an item on the popup menu by positioning the cursor and simulating a LH mouse click (using PostMessage's with WM_LBUTTONDOWN / WM_LBUTTONUP). This all works as expected if there is no other code following it (i.e. my app exits) or there is an AfxMessageBox separating this code and further mouse-click simulations. The failure is that execution of the popup menu item doesn't result in a new window. I get the feeling that the external app is not getting 'time' to receive/react to the simulated clicks until my app exits (Presumably, the AfxMessageBox must also have the same effect - yes ?). I have tried Sleep(10000) after the context menu operation, but this doesn't seem to help. Do I need to (somehow) inform the system that my app doesn't need the remainder of it's current timeslot, thus giving the external app time to "do its stuff". If so, how do I do that ?
Doug
|
|
|
|
|
Does the blocking SendMessage(...) instead og PostMessage help?
Vipin - MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Tried SendMessage originally, and couldn't even get the initial stages to work. I have currently got this stuff implemented in InitDialog() of a dialog-based app - and I was in error in my original posting when I said that it only worked when my app exited - I should have said that it only worked once the DoModal() had executed. Is this a clue ?? 
Doug
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming you can get the process handle (if your app launched the other app with ::CreateProcess(), for instance), after posting the mouseclick message, try using ::WaitForInputIdle(processHandle, timetowait) like so:
bool bIdle = false;
DWORD dwWaitResult;
dwWaitResult = ::WaitForInputIdle(hProcess, 5000);
switch (dwWaitResult)
{
case 0 :
{
bIdle = true;
}
break;
case WAIT_TIMEOUT :
{
AfxMessageBox("Timed out waiting for idle state.");
}
break;
case WAIT_FAILED :
{
}
break;
}
------- sig starts
"I've heard some drivers saying, 'We're going too fast here...'. If you're not here to race, go the hell home - don't come here and grumble about going too fast. Why don't you tie a kerosene rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-- modified at 9:00 Sunday 8th January, 2006
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
