|
Ultimate Boot CD
Emergency Boot CD
Knoppix Live CD (or most Knoppix-based live cds)
Start any of these CDs and
UBCD/EBCD: try cfdisk or fdisk
Knoppix: try QtPartEd
Additionally, any Linux-Boot- or -Rescue-Cd should have a partitioner.
Any of those _usually_ are able to delete any partition.
Once the partition is deleted, use Windows or any of the tools mentioned above to create the new partitions to your liking.
|
|
|
|
|
You might need to import foreign disk. Read this article[^] for more detail.
|
|
|
|
|
i wont to know about any os without shell and cornol
MARA !DEA
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT??????????? An O/S without a kernel or a shell? You're joking, right?!
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
If there is no Kernel and no Shell the coding goes something like this
public void main()<br />
{<br />
return null;<br />
}
If there is no kernel and no shell how do you interact with the system? The definition for an OS without a kernel or shell is firmware - but even this has a kernel - why do you want this?
|
|
|
|
|
AndyM103 wrote: The definition for an OS without a kernel or shell is firmware - but even this has a kernel - why do you want this?
Why don't you check out which post you're replying to before hitting the "Post message" button...
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
kernel is Core of an OS, without it, there isn't any OS. What do you mean without a shell?
ps: Why do you search such thing? If you want to replace your krnel, then you can use Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
?? i think you can develop such operating system!!!
Goog-Luck!!!!!!!!!
Any query related to VB.NET+Network Programming
email: sharma.hariomprakash@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
I have some headache of testing my asp. based web pages in my local computer because of emailing is requiring a server. Is there a way to set up a simultaneous server (I send emails to myself) for testing purposes without getting connected to internet.
If there is a way to do that please let me know!
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Install "Internet Information Services (IIS)". It's Windows XP component. I don't know how to use it, but smpt services are includet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have WindowsXP Professional 2002 installe my system, I am facing the problem like My saart meny bar is missing very often and if I restart machine only I will able to get back.
But I can able to view applications by Alt + Tab button.
Can any body give solution for this,
Thanks & Regards,
Siva
|
|
|
|
|
Do you get any error when your menu "Start" is not visiblity??? If so what kind of error you get?
_____________________
Proud to be Albanian
_____________________
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am not getting any error,
Only problem is I am not able to see the Start Menu task bar..So I am not able to click Start menu with mouse or selecting any other items on task bar.
By pressing windows button or Ctrl + Esc or Alt + Tab I can able to work.
Thanks,
Siva
|
|
|
|
|
what happens when you hit the "Windows" key on your keyboard (or Ctrl+Esc) ?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When I click ( Ctrl + Esc ) asusual it is showing the Start Menu Items,
Only problem is I am not able to see the Start Menu task bar..So I am not able to click Start menu with mouse or selecting any other items on task bar.
By pressing windows button or Ctrl + Esc or Alt + Tab I can able to work.
Thanks,
Siva
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have autohide enabled? You can check by hovering your mouse cursor a few pixels from the bottom of the screen. IF so it'll pop up after a few seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
To get your taskbar back, close all Windows Explorer windows, press Ctrl+Alt+Delete (for the Task Manager), go to the Applications tab, press New Task, type "explorer", and press OK. (The Win+R shortcut for the Run dialog may work as well, but I don't remember for sure.) As to why it disappears, I don't know - but perhaps you should use ShellExView[^] to look for any shell extensions that may be causing Explorer to crash. The best way to find out which one is the cause is to disable all non-MS extensions, and then add them in one-by-one.
|
|
|
|
|
I am absolutly joining with you. I think your explorer.exe is corrupted / replaced by some other funny programs or/ viruses. Please do the following steps
1. Go to Folder options in My computer.
2. Click View TAB
3. Unchech the option Hide windows protected files.
4. Goto %Systemroot%/Windows/System32/DLLCACHE
5. Copy the file explorer.exe and paste in %Systemroot%\Windows
6. Overwrite the file explorer.exe
Do the steps carefully and restore the system settings manually
Cheers
Jijo
JIJO BABY - Lets Play C#
|
|
|
|
|
Try the Microsoft Help Centre before even attempting to mess with explorer.exe!
Are you sure it isn't on autohide.
|
|
|
|
|
Do I have this right?
-WinFX (Vista) replaces Win32
-WPF (Vista) replaces the GDI
-Forms (Vista) replaces MFC
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
hey, i don't know for the other, but AFAIK, Widows Forms is a .NET feature, so how could it replace MFC ?
|
|
|
|
|
Because you can use MFC in .NET. But it seems to me that any new development in the .NET framework would use Forms instead. Does that make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
robasmith wrote: -WinFX (Vista) replaces Win32
No. Vista is, at the very least, a set of extensions to Win32.
robasmith wrote: -WPF (Vista) replaces the GDI
Hardly. WPF is set of API's that supports a richer user experience. GDI and GDI+ aren't being replaced by WPF. Not yet anyway.
robasmith wrote: -Forms (Vista) replaces MFC
Nope. Windows Forms is to the .NET Framework what MFC is to writing Windows applications in Visual C++. A set of standard classes and interfaces to ease the creation of a consistent user experience from application to application.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm... Maybe "replace" was the wrong word.
Vista is the OS. Win32 is the API for creating app's that run on the OS. How can Vista be an extension of Win32?
From Wikipedia:
"WinFX is the name of a new set of managed API's that Microsoft will introduce in its upcoming operating system, Windows Vista to supersede the current Windows API. The Windows API will still be present in Vista, but it will not give direct access to all the new functionality introduced with the new Application Programming Interface. In addition, WinFX is intended to give programmers easier access to the functionality present in the Windows API."
So WinFX may not be replacing Win32, but it certainly provides access to the core Vista OS were Win32 has no such access. Is that correct?
I'm not saying the GDI is going away. I am saying that a subset of the WPF (2D and 3D graphics, vector and raster graphics) utilizes DirectX. So any new development in the .NET framework would use the WPF instead of the GDI. Is that correct?
Again, I'm not saying MFC is going away. But any new GUI/front end development in the .NET framework would use Forms instead of MFC. Is that correct?
Thanks again...
|
|
|
|