|
Thanks, but I found only a little part of the article.
Do you know any other place?
Thanks
Andrea
|
|
|
|
|
No, I don't. Sorry. Maybe you could do what I did and plug the title into Google. A cached version might well be available on wayback.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea who approved this "tip": Calculation TextBox Control[^] - and I note it's now deleted - but it was on the main page and appeared as approved fro a while. Perhaps a quiet word about reading items prior to approval would be appropriate? As it was it was unusable: the control it lauded wasn't even attached as a download! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I can indeed do that, but I'm not 100% sure the story on how this got approved. I will dig in first.
I would be surprised if it were moderators because it is miraculous when technical blog entries and tips get approved without an editors hand. In my experience they don't typically get enough people looking at them and approving them to get the required five approvals. But there are no editors names associated with the public version? Somethin's weird.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
That's a relief!
I'm happier with a bug in the system than "rogue moderators" approving anything their mates post...
Mind you, I don't have to find and fix it
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: approving anything their mates countrymen post...
Is what I've found.
|
|
|
|
|
his other tip / trick is not much better 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Could we have a filter on number of votes, in addition to rating?
Rating can get skewed by peer voting but you'd need to have a big arsenal of buddies to float to the top of the pile.
"And when I have understanding of computers, I shall be the Supreme Being!"
|
|
|
|
|
You're always welcome to report articles as "extremely poor quality." We go through reports later and re-assess poor articles. Real bad ones can be deleted.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
After years of lurking around here and learning from other writers articles I would like to submit an article myself. However, since I don't regard myself a professional I would like someone who does to review my code (200 lines btw.) before I do. Is there someone here willing to do that or is there some kind of forum on the webs where people offer free code reviews?
edit: spelling
modified 6-Jan-15 14:52pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
alright 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report it in the Spam and Abuse Watch[^] forum. You should also include a link to the offending article.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plagiarism was noted by someone else. I just chimed in as a second opinion.
These knuckledraggers should be tarred and feathered and run out on a rail for attempting to take credit for someone else's work.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm new to project authoring so I downloaded article-template.zip and got codeproject_template.html from it as a starting point.
Its style sheet links to "http://www.codeproject.com/App_Themes/Std/CodeProject.css" which does not seem to exist.
It's not a big deal as my HTML is pretty simple but I'm not much of an HTML coder, so am I misinterpreting something? The line with the link is:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://www.codeproject.com/App_Themes/Std/CodeProject.css">
|
|
|
|
|
try this:
http:
modified 4-Jan-15 19:26pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, that URL works fine.
Is that what should be in codeproject_template.html and, if so, is there someplace I ought to suggest that?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
I have just set up a technical blog import.
However, I have written a 3 part series, and they have imported as 3 individual articles that have no indication that they belong to a series specifically on codeproject.
Does code project provide constructs for indicating a series, or should I just put custom links and text in each article to refer to the other parts?
Thank you much.
The 3 parts are:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/858760/A-real-world-journey-of-fighting-toward-Continuous
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/858893/A-real-world-journey-of-fighting-toward-Continuo
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/858892/A-Real-World-Journey-of-Fighting-Toward-Continuo
|
|
|
|
|
I can see you've gone ahead and marked them Part 1, 2, and 3. I think that's a good way to go about it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only person who will be able to tell you the definitive reason for the downvote is the person who downvoted you. BTW - this forum is intended for people who have written, or who intend to write, articles.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh ok. When it showed "Authority" I thought the admin team has done. Thanks Pete.Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
