|
It got closed as unclear or imcomplete. I restarted it here[^]. Could someone tell me what I should do to make it complete?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Format is a bit messed up and I can't tell the owner due to missing message board.
Can someone have a look?
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=159404&aid=876274[^]
thanks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Rescued.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why bring it up here? The people who can do it are the ones who will see that thread in Sugs and Bugs. You just have to have a little bit of patience.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, article 'Technical guide on c and related topics' was published however due to serious comments it was closed and I accidentally ended up closing my account. However, now that I have reopened my account with different membership number, and also posted modified article (by closing all comments to previous article) which has been once again published. However, the old article still exists as 'closed' and appears when googled.
So how to get rid of this old article link?
|
|
|
|
|
Could you post the link please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've killed it. The link in Google doesn't take you to the article now.
|
|
|
|
|
I have started writing an article and I have saved it as a draft. When I try to "preview" it. I get weird tags for one link and looks good for another link.
BTW, both link refers to same article.
Works fine:
Protected Access Modifier
Issue:
Protected Access Modifier
I am not sure how to resolve this. Any help is appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. The link you mentioned is the one I am working with
|
|
|
|
|
I just needed to ask regarding editing the approved article.
I want to update/edit my article (approved) as there was a mistake pointed out by a member. My question is if I edit it, doest it go back to moderation queue and starts from fresh or not?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: if I edit it, doest it go back to moderation queue and starts from fresh or not?
It goes back into the moderation queue.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Or user trying to do something wrong?
I notized that this now closed article[^] was being always locked for edition. A bit curiosity made me click on revisions. I find the list[^] a bit odd.
Is that normal? (I am not reporting a bug... at least not yet, I am just curious)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Also reported here[^] and here[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, thanks. I should have taken a look into B&S
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-ewington
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=158589&aid=873881[^] is having problems with the format and (on the same time) there is no message board (we already spoke about it) to tell it to the owner
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The dev team is aware of the issue, now I think it is just a matter of prioritizing that issue amongst the others. In the meantime, I have fixed the formatting on that fella.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thank you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Managed Media Aggregation using Rtsp and Rtp[^]
The only thing I know is... I don't want / consider it necessary to be reported.
My point is the almost full page of explanation about his dog and how he passed away. I have left him a comment with my opinion, but I would like to know yours.
To be honest, I would change it edit it myself. But I don't know if that would be too rude and (on the other hand) I have never used the article editor yet and I would not like to create a mess.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
a tough one - while its long, I'd leave it as is - we as human beings are the sum of our experiences, so, we know a little more about what makes the author tick - and he's a little more human to us - space is cheap
on other sites he'd get made to cut that out and put it in a blog - but Im constantly reminded we 'are not other sites' when I look at the brutality of 'SO' for example
|
|
|
|