|
Do you mean manually? If so what browser?
Brad
Australian
- Bradml on "MVP Status"
If this was posted in a programming board please rate my answer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Brad,
I have asp.net web server control (text box) on which i have placed a required field validator which doesn't work on tab and only works on page submission. well i am using internet explorer 6.0
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think you understand how client/server relationship works.
Brad
Australian
- peterchen on "Who has the worst keyboard"
Keyboard? Ha! I throw magnets over the RAM chips!
|
|
|
|
|
The ASP.NET validators will only fire when the user submits the form, not when a field is focused/unfocused. I assume thats what you mean? If you mean the validation is not firing at all client side, only on a postback, you may have the validators client side check property set to false (can't remember the name, it should be pretty obvious). Remember users can ALWAYS disable client side script, theres no way for you to 100% guarantee its enabled so always use the server-side validators as well.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got about 200 web pages that I'm sorting out. I'd love to find a thumbnailer kind of how in windows you can "View as thumbnail" I'm wondering if there is any Windows add-on/extension that will render a thumbnail image of an aspx page for you... except do it for about 200 of them.
I know I'm probably looking for something on the same level as the fountain of youth or a .net version of code project but maybe not so it's worth asking.
My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius, Commander of the Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions, loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Father to a murdered process, husband to a murdered thread. And I will have my affinity, in this life or the next. - Gladiator. (Okay, not quite Gladiator but close.)
I work to live. I do not live to work. My clients do not seem capable of grasping this fact.
-- moved at 2:47 Wednesday 28th March, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't Vista do something like that?
|
|
|
|
|
As subject !
thanks.
Formula of Success
hardwork=
H+A+R+D+W+O+R+K = 8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98% only
knowledge=
K+N+O+W+L+E+D+G+E= 11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96% only
attitude=
A+T+T+I+T+U+D+E = 1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%
It is our attitude towards life and work that makes our life 100%
|
|
|
|
|
nothingbutcat wrote: hardwork=
H+A+R+D+W+O+R+K = 8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98% only
knowledge=
K+N+O+W+L+E+D+G+E= 11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96% only
attitude=
A+T+T+I+T+U+D+E = 1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%
It is our attitude towards life and work that makes our life 100%
That is bloody stupid.
nothingbutcat wrote: What methodology should a system for Hotel intranet development used ?
If you have been hired to do that and can't answer it then you are a con.
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your kind reply..
It is useful......
It is our attitude towards life and work that makes our life 100%
|
|
|
|
|
When you install Google's toolbar in IE7 the right-click context menu shows their favicon next to their context menu insertions. Does anyone know how to do this? Also would like to know how to add separators above & below context items. Any help would be most appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
We have a web application that users buy a subscription to and log in to from the web. Currently, they have to put in a username, password, and the credit card number they used to subscribe in order to log in. They have to enter the cc# because the thought is they would be unlikely to share this information with other people and thus can't share login information. Users have complained about having to do this everytime they want to use it. I would be content with just removing it, but I am told we need some other method to prevent users from sharing login information and I cannot think of anything else and a google isn't helping me. Does anyone have any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
eggsovereasy wrote: Users have complained about having to do this everytime they want to use it. I would be content with just removing it, but I am told we need some other method to prevent users from sharing login information and I cannot think of anything else and a google isn't helping me. Does anyone have any suggestions?
I would complain also and probably wouldnt use the site. What is the reasoning for this "preventing of sharing information"? Users will do as they please and all you can do is tell them not to.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)
|
|
|
|
|
They say if person A has a sub and has friends B and C, then person A will give his login info to B and C and we lose out on 2 subscriptions. So they want a way to stop that.
I'm with you though, seems like a waste of time to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Save the IP address they are using for each login, and display it to the user somewhere (so they are aware of the logging). Inform the users that sharing accounts is ground for cancelling accounts without refund.
Normally a user would log in from one or two places. The first three bytes of the IP address is usually constant for a location, but the last may vary if they have a dynamically assigned IP addresses.
You should quite easily see if some account is accessed from a lot of places, and then you can investigate further where they are located. If a user is logging in from Australia and then ten minutes later from Finland, it's clearly not the same physical person.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the idea, I'll put this on the list of possible options.
|
|
|
|
|
I would also complain about this method and not use your site. What are the security procedures around storing the credit card numbers? Do you use SSL at the login? How much are the subscriptions worth as compared to being sued out of existence when the database gets hacked and the numbers are grabbed?
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I realize this is dumb. The sub is $180/year and it was a victory just to try and get anything except the credit card. It uses SSL, how its stored, I don't know I didn't make the authentication method nor do I have access to that DB. Now enough about how terrible it is now, I know it is that is why I'm trying to get it changed, but they just have to have some thing to prevent login sharing (which I think is a waste of time).
|
|
|
|
|
Has anybody seen C#/.NET code for message boards to use on a web page?
|
|
|
|
|
The CP boards are open source.
Brad
Australian
- Me on "Public interest"
If you actually read this let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
I did. Free usually means unsecure. .NET should come with a message board API.
|
|
|
|
|
http://forums.asp.net/
CodeProject
Snitz Forums
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I looked through them. I see you can purchase or get free message boards. Now, I am wondering if .NET comes with an API for making message boards, so I can customize on my own.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
We have many web applications on our web server (Windows 2003 IIS 6.0).
We would like to have one solution to handle all web application errors:
- Redirect to general error website
- Send e-mail alert to server admin
We do not have access to source code of all our web applications (ASP.NET), so we cannot always handle errors in source code.
Do you know any good solution for this scenario?
One of our ideas was to set custom error section in web.config files, and redirect users to ASP.NET web application.
This application has to display user-friendly message and send email.
The problem is that such web page is potentially security hole!
Anyone can access such page and generate hundreds of email messages.
Maybe is it workaround for this?
Thanks!
Wojtek
|
|
|
|
|
You can easily deal with certain errors based on the the server error such as 404, 401, 301, whatever. Other than that, you will have to mess with source code in order to know the type of exception unless you are using .NET 2.0 which has that capability built into the web.config.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)
|
|
|
|
|
GlobalASAX has an handler for that.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
