|
Member 2734270 wrote: Is there some way so that I can get all these information.
No
Member 2734270 wrote: please help..
No
There is no Ctrl button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control
|
|
|
|
|
norm .net wrote: Member 2734270 wrote:
Is there some way so that I can get all these information.
No
Yes ofcource there is a way to get all these information n I have got the way.
norm .net wrote: Member 2734270 wrote:
please help..
No
If you do not have the guts to help others then do not expose it by saying "NO", simply ignore it....
|
|
|
|
|
Oh dear. norm.net has the guts - he's helped a lot of people, however you made the classic mistake of posting on the wrong forum. You didn't bother reading the bit at the top of the forum, and your arrogance in this reply is simply staggering. What's wrong? Is your humility and learning chip broken? Have you somehow got stuck in a*sehole mode?
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Oh dear. norm.net has the guts - he's helped a lot of people, however you made the classic mistake of posting on the wrong forum. You didn't bother reading the bit at the top of the forum, and your arrogance in this reply is simply staggering. What's wrong? Is your humility and learning chip broken? Have you somehow got stuck in a*sehole mode?
Oh buddy may be norm.net helped others but you can never help others. Anyway I have considered the name of forum but there was no other forum that can help me in this direction, and simply I thought the members of this forum will be more intelligent so may you, but you have proved me wrong.
and ofcource mind your language.....
|
|
|
|
|
Were you born this stupid or did you have to work at it?
The Coding Horrors board is for mocking truely terrible code you've seen. Infinitely more appropriate boards on CP for your question include the C++ board or the hardware /drivers board.
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
Not only have you cross posted, you have reposted despite having been given answers, you've ignored answers and then you have become defensive when you committed a basic mistake. I'm amazed that you think this is a more appropriate forum than some of the others you've posted the same question on.
Instead of taking your licks and moving on, you've tried to engage in a battle of wits and, let's face it, in your case it's unarmed combat. Just move on and learn from it - it's one of life's little lessons.
|
|
|
|
|
…you just keep feeding us with evidence that you're an idiot.
You know posting it here means nobody will help you at all.
ROFLOLMFAO
|
|
|
|
|
There seems to be a problem with the ASP.NET data repeating controls, Repeater and DataList. If a new DataSource is empty, the control appears to keep the rows of the old DataSource. While looking for a solution I stumbled upon this[^] gem:
<br />
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load<br />
repeater.DataBind()<br />
Dim record As String = repeater.Items.Count.ToString<br />
If record = 0 Then<br />
repeater.Visible = False<br />
Else<br />
repeater.Visible = True<br />
End If<br />
End Sub<br />
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! A three-fer!
|
|
|
|
|
What's a three fer?
|
|
|
|
|
I see this so much, it's sad
|
|
|
|
|
I met an int once... he was looking for the intwives.
|
|
|
|
|
that's art
(yes|no|maybe)*
|
|
|
|
|
Extracted from a really slow stored proc:
<br />
SELECT 0 * Sum(IIf([amortisedClosePriceIssueYld]=0 Or [amortisedClosePrice]=0,0,-[bsqflag]*[closedq]*[valpoint]*([amortisedClosePriceIssueYld]-[amortisedtpissueyld]))) AS LocalRealisedAmortIssue<br />
FROM ((((PL1RPLCloseOuts INNER JOIN seclocal AS sec ON PL1RPLCloseOuts.id = sec.id) LEFT JOIN SecTypeValidationRuleslocal AS SecTypeValidationRules ON sec.sectype = SecTypeValidationRules.sectype) INNER JOIN TradeFundlocal AS TradeFund ON PL1RPLCloseOuts.fund = TradeFund.fund) INNER JOIN tradetlocal AS TradeT ON PL1RPLCloseOuts.tt = TradeT.tt) INNER JOIN PL1RplTaxlots ON (PL1RPLCloseOuts.tnum = PL1RplTaxlots.tnum) AND (PL1RPLCloseOuts.tt = PL1RplTaxlots.tt)<br />
Yes indeed - do a huge amount of maths and multiply the resulting figure by zero...oh
|
|
|
|
|
You would think a product as sophisticated as SQL Server would be able to optimize that down...
|
|
|
|
|
Only if the SQL standard allows it to.
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose theoretically the maths calc could have side effects.
Bram van Kampen
|
|
|
|
|
I saw the "SELECT 0 * Sum" and immediately thought this was a joke.
Apparently I was wrong.
Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means?
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps a marriage of SQLServer with Unix.
There is something in Unix where you can divert junk files (howmuch ever huge it is, even beyond the capacity of the disk) to an infine sink called /dev/null .
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
MySQL has a fantastic storage engine called "Blackhole" It supports Inserts only, not deletes, selects or Updates.
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: something in Unix
DOS and OpenVMS also have null devices.
|
|
|
|
|
I came across the following function:
private static string[] SplitByString(string testString, string split)
{
int offset = 0;
int index = 0;
int[] offsets = new int[testString.Length + 1];
while (index < testString.Length)
{
int indexOf = testString.IndexOf(split, index);
if (indexOf != -1)
{
offsets[offset++] = indexOf;
index = (indexOf + split.Length);
}
else
{
index = testString.Length;
}
}
string[] final = new string[offset + 1];
if (offset == 0)
{
final[0] = testString;
}
else
{
offset--;
final[0] = testString.Substring(0, offsets[0]);
for (int i = 0; i < offset; i++)
{
final[i + 1] = testString.Substring(offsets[i] + split.Length, offsets[i + 1]
- offsets[i] - split.Length);
}
final[offset + 1] = testString.Substring(offsets[offset] + split.Length);
}
return final;
}
and just had to run it in order to make sure that this function was really only a rewrite of String.Split(string[] seperator, StringSplitOptions option) which was taken from some website.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree that it's not very well written, but when was it written?
Splitting on string was added in .net 2.0; this may have been written before that... as was mine.
Mine also has the benefit of honoring quotes and escapes within the string, so splitting
12345,"Coyote, Wile E.","\"Super Genius\""
on comma will return the proper results.
Reinventing the wheel is acceptable if (and only if) it results in a better wheel.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: 12345,"Coyote, Wile E.","\"Super Genius\""
If he was that much of a genius, why did he keep buying all this crap from ACME after everything he bought repeatedly failed??
|
|
|
|
|
They're the only ones to give him a credit card.
|
|
|
|