Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
If, by 'trust', you mean, 'I trust them not to lose the data I've stored on their servers', then sure, I trust Google, as I use their photos and drive.
If you mean, 'I trust them keep my information private', then no. So, I don't keep anything worth being private outside my own computer. I'm assuming google has already scanned all the photos I've uploaded and released the meta data to marketing demons (for example).
Your second definition is the one I was assuming being polled.
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
...why bother with 5 other monsters, if you can share your data with the one that beats the other five together easily?
No, really, I do almost everything I need in the google cloud, own two chromeBooks, and this includes office and all that day-work.
I have a windows pc at home for gaming. There are no real alternatives to that as I would rather put my hands in molten iron than touch a console or a controller.
This PC runs with local account, not microsoft and holds steam, battle.net and android studio for my private development projects. that's it.
No local data. It's all in the cloud.
It shouldn't be compulsory to vote on each option.
I've never used Apple because I don't like their proprietary BS and I've never used LinkedIn because I think it's (insert four letter word starting with "w" of choice) so I've never really considered the security of either.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
Love it when someone from HR starts hiding behind 'we'. You are already in trouble when they start to talk like that, so why not have a little fun? Perhaps you can even catch them off guard and then they make mistakes.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
I don't use any of them to store my health details, and by law (U.S.) none of the companies listed are licensed or setup to store health information anyway (PHI) as far as I know. So, why use them for that?
Google and Amazon have some credit card info for fast purchases, and I have not had any issues with that "yet", but I still don't "trust" them as far as I can "throw" them.
I use Keeper to store the important stuff, and I do trust them explicitly.
I don't store my important stuff on my computer, never have, never will - Keeper, along with info on paper stored in my secret lair 5,000 feet underground.
Personal photos are stored on Google servers, but since I don't take naked selphies( ), I really have nothing to worry about there, hack or not. So, they get pics of my dogs and backyard, big deal.
I do not know anything about these apps, first time hearing about them.
With that said, if they are designed to store PHI and HIPAA related data, then great, use it if you feel comfortable about it. I am going to assume that all the health info these apps store is encrypted at the least; I would hope so.