|
If we design computers with AI that is designed to think like humans, isn't that just going to mean a bunch of computers as thick as most of us? Ah, the sweet smell of progress
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
AI but with care. We don't need to cought up with iRobot like situation.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say: everything, what makes life better.
- Connectivity with Everything (see 4.)
- True Artificial Intelligence
- More storage capacity than the oldest HD's
- Common power & video sockets (mobiles, tablets, laptops, etc.) - one standard!
- Common standard for documents (it might be OpenXML)
|
|
|
|
|
Reliability and security. Can we have those things anymore?
Back when large-scale system life cycles went on for years or even decades, we had some really solid, proven systems. Nowadays tech companies are so in love with shiny new things that it seems like technologies get ditched for something new before they have a chance to mature. I wish we would stop this make-something-new-for-reasons attitude and slow the hell down and focus on making what we have actually work as it should. The faster software changes, the less reliable and secure it becomes. If you don't believe me, update your Windows box.
|
|
|
|
|
1) Efficiency in power in all electronics.
2) Memory speed persisted storage (cheap and lot of it).
3) Better batteries.
|
|
|
|
|
Ive done this job for 35 years, I still love it but wont lose any sleep when I don't have to any more
|
|
|
|
|
The most important next step in computing could be solving the legacy problem. A significant majority of the software that manages our lives is obsolete.
|
|
|
|
|
And it will only get worse I am afraid. How many "dead" languages will there be in 20 years? I maintain a key program initially written in Fortran in 1981 and still gets new features. It is like playing Jenga but I am powerless to replace it. Pretty sure it will still be running after I retire.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you see, languages are tools. Hammers were invented quite a long time ago, and they're still produced, used, mantained and improved. Why? Because they are very good to solve some classes of problems. And that can be said for pincers, knives, C, FORTRAN nad any other tool, IMHO.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
FORTRAN is still a very good tool to solve the class of mathematical problems but you wont see many programmers making it their language of choice for that. No modern IDE, not hip, never was exposed to it, etc. many reasons I suppose. It's not still used because it's a good tool, it's still used because it would be expensive to rewrite the programs.
|
|
|
|
|
Rosenne wrote: A significant majority of the software that manages our lives is obsolete.
According to whom? Just because software is old doesn't mean it's useless, it's as useful as it ever was, and given the fact that it's been maintained for so long it's likely more reliable. What do you want to use for a mission-critical system, an old program that has been doing the job fine for 30 years, or something just cooked up by the new kid?
|
|
|
|
|
This is precisely the problem. It does work, it is mission critical, but it is expensive to maintain, difficult to adapt, and what does one do when the programmers who know it retire?
|
|
|
|
|
That smells like opportunity, maybe I need to learn me some FORTRAN and COBOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really only available to those with multi-thousand dollar ASIC miners...
-= Reelix =-
|
|
|
|
|
what are you talking about ? you don't have to mine to get it.
Actually, mining is not profitable right now, better buy it on exchanges.
The explosion of service this technology unlocks will keep us busy in the future
|
|
|
|
|
Digital payments as Paypal or ApplePay arent bound to Bitcoins. So Bitcoins arent so important - only for miners and speculants.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Listening music and looking at movie works good enough with radio and TV, no need for internet, it is only good for nerds
|
|
|
|
|
if these throw-backs keep listening only to their core constituency (fat wallets with a short term view of filling the wallets even more) - then they will break our wonderful toy.
It's that's simple.
P.S. I hope Google moves all of it's offices and employment out of Europe - (vide infra).
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
"You must use Windows XP since that's what we've been using for the past 10 years at this company!"
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU..........
-= Reelix =-
|
|
|
|
|
"Regulators who actually understand the technology"
That will be somewhere after AI, so the technology can explain itself....
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Give us some credit
Republic credits or Cubits?
|
|
|
|
|
True freedom does not exist in any society when any/every move communication, etc. can/may be tracked. monitored or scrutinized.
-- Martin Goff
mlgoff_59@yahoo.com
KK4EBS
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm no joke icon
Martin Goff wrote: True freedom does not exist in any society when any/every move communication, etc. can/may be tracked. monitored or scrutinized.
Well that's easy, we just have to go back to 1930 or something then
|
|
|
|
|
They said think BIG. I want the tools/tech to obfuscate myself in all of the tracking systems. Personally controlled/selective anonymity is freedom.
-- Martin Goff
mlgoff_59@yahoo.com
KK4EBS
|
|
|
|