|
Actually I have 
I would head that way if MS didn't already natively provide some alternative.
I've browsed those docs and one day - I'd like to try my hand at doing something like that in C#.
I wish there were more such simple/in-depth projects online. I can't peruse postgresql src without shutting down all communication with the outside world for 1~6 months 
Thanks,
-Luther
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps you could just create a dataset with the tables needed and save/load this as an XML-File.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
As I mentioned in the original post, "I could resort to file based storage" ... If I could cap the total amout of data - or develop a scheme to incrementally load/search data that exceeded some memory limit. I'm just worried that such a solution will not scale well.
Unless I'm reading the entire file into memory, I think this might be a bit slow and I would probably have to implement a searchable object hierarchy. While not the end of the world, thats just not where I want to focus my time right now. SELECT statements are just fine.
I've looked at SQLlite (open source file/embedded dbase) and one day, I may implement a small, file dbase - but for now, runtime XML access/storage might not be feasible.
I will try to encapsulate the data access anyway. It may make sense to use an XML solution for testing and prototype demonstrations.
Thanks,
-Luther
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, this is a great thread.
If someone were to do an article showing a simple database app in one or multiple flavors (xml, sqllite, jet) that would be a pretty useful article imho. !!
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
________________________________________
Gosh, it would be awful pleas'n, to reason out the reason, for things I can't explain.
Then perhaps I'd deserve ya, and be even worthy of ya..
if I only had a brain!
|
|
|
|
|
hi .. i have came to know that there is no help for sending a mms in .net .. so plzzzz if any one know any source code or any document plzzzzzz tell me ... ( 
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean SMS, as in short messaging service (often called "texting" for mobile phones)? You'll need an SMS gateway. Google for "SMS" and you'll find some free and commercial gateways. Sending messages to it depends a little on the implementation (depending on what you need to do), otherwise it is a standard system and documentation would be included with the product (assuming you get even a half-way decent one).
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not familiar with that (I'm not exactly hip on the mobile craze these days), but wouldn't "MultiMedia Message" be "MMM"?
Oh well, guess we'll have to wait and see what the person is talking about. If either of us is right, though, it'll still require a gateway.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uwe Keim wrote:
"MMS" is a way of sending images and such stuff from mobile phone to mobile phone.
Ah, so perhaps Mobile-to-Mobile Service. Seems reasonable. If that's the case, though, the CompactFramework most likely wouldn't support this because it would've been too new. Of course, if it uses sockets, you could always encapsulate your own protocol. 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
MMS is for multimedia message service.
GSM operators have MMS Servers and these mms servers have interfaces to speak with the outside. Since messages are in KBytes it can not be handled with SMS. Instead it can be handled with HTTP or SMTP interfaces. There might be some special operator interfaces as well. So it depends on the interface of the MMS server. If it is SMTP , you have to handle it using SMTP codes.
|
|
|
|
|
Recently Filomela posted a nice article "Enhanced rich edit control"
http://www.codeproject.com/richedit/MyRtfFileHandling.asp[^]. Is there a dot net wrapper for this? I'd email Filomela but i can't find any other posts from Filomela except his rather nice article!
Alternatively, does anyone know of a dot net control that comes with simple editing, some version of standard menus and formatting buttons built in?
TIA!
________________________________________
Gosh, it would be awful pleas'n, to reason out the reason, for things I can't explain.
Then perhaps I'd deserve ya, and be even worthy of ya..
if I only had a brain!
|
|
|
|
|
Just post a message at the bottom of the article. Messages are forwarded to the article's author(s).
For read-made RTF controls, I'm sure there is existing ones, but this actually isn't hard to do yourself. The RichTextBox already has methods for most of the features you need (like Cut, Copy, and Paste), and things like font families, colors, and styles are hard to do either.
To find existing ones, just search or browse this site, or try googling the rest of the 'net (which includes CodeProject articles in the search, of course).
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Heath, thanks, i guess you didn't understand my post.
Upon googling the net i came across an edit control that seems to have some very nice properties. It was written by someone named Filomela and posted Sept 14 2003. It seems to be based on an MFC control (?) called RichEdit.
I would contemplate writing such control myself, since all the elements are there, but it would take me some non trivial amount of time (2 weeks??) to understand stuff like bullets and indents, find the correct images for the buttons, and so on. And after i was all done my code might even have bugs in it.
Furthermore, having already noticed that there are lots of variants of the MFC RichEdit control, which are quite similar to what i'm looking for, i thought this might actually be a common problem. so i thought perhaps the dotnet community might have also have produced either some native versions or a managed wrapper for RichEdit.
But on googling with c# and managed, i didn't turn up anything besides the MFC type stuff. So i thought i'd post the question, and title it "RichEdit wrapper?", to see whether anyone has come across a dotnet version of something like Filomena's article, or if not, would anyone like to recommend their favorite component library with a good lightweight rtf editor?
Thanks in advance!
________________________________________
Gosh, it would be awful pleas'n, to reason out the reason, for things I can't explain.
Then perhaps I'd deserve ya, and be even worthy of ya..
if I only had a brain!
|
|
|
|
|
TuringTest1 wrote in original post:
I'd email Filomela but i can't find any other posts from Filomela except his rather nice article!
It was this statement that prompted me to recommend that you post a message at the bottom of the article. I understood your query just fine.
What I was saying is that the RichTextBox already supports the functionality he's using. He's exploiting such functionality in MFC (using C/C++) just like you can exploit the functionality of the RichTextBox in .NET.
Upon searching - and to my amazement - there really isn't much on canned RTF control solutions complete with toolbars. I can send you some source I have that I wrote for our app. It doesn't have everything you're looking for, but most of it and there should be enough there for you to figure out how to add the rest.
I'll send you the required source and you can look it over. It should compile fine, so just instantiate it and add it to a form. I'll send it to the email address I saw when I got notification that you replied. If you know that won't work, please send me a private email to this message (click the Email link at the bottom of this message).
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
wow-- it came through just fine.. i see, you werent talking out of your hat, you've taken your own advice already.. 
and i will do a post at the bottom of the article-- thanks!
________________________________________
Gosh, it would be awful pleas'n, to reason out the reason, for things I can't explain.
Then perhaps I'd deserve ya, and be even worthy of ya..
if I only had a brain!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't usually "talk out of my hat". It's from experience and a great memory. Sometimes people that annoy me (those constant reposts or those that don't get the point after 100 messages) I give blind advice to that usually works (but not always), but I hold true to "give a man a fish and you'll feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for life". Know what I mean? 
Anyway, hope you like it. As I said, the RichTextBox already has all the functionality you need (well, maybe not some wild ideas you might see in Word or from third-party solutions from scratch). It's just a matter of exposing that functionality through a UI.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
 Ok, ok-- you are absolutely correct. This IS the much better way to do it.
 i do have a question about imagelists, before i be fishing for some within some well known apps, do you happen to know whether these are available in vs or msdn-- or more to the point, whether ms has a policy of encouraging standard images for buttons to get a standard user experience in stuff like rtf button design, or whether they view that as every app's value-add.
 in any case, yet once again thanks for the fishing tips!!
________________________________________
Gosh, it would be awful pleas'n, to reason out the reason, for things I can't explain.
Then perhaps I'd deserve ya, and be even worthy of ya..
if I only had a brain!
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, look at the thread right below this current thread! (http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=706678&forumid=1649#xx706678xx[^])
You can also find common icons and image strips in shell32.dll, and in your Common7\Graphics subdirectory of your Visual Studio installation directory.
If you use bitmaps, make sure you set the ImageList.TransparentColor before adding images, and that all the bitmaps (or the image strip) uses the same color mask (magenta is common).
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know where to get a free pack of pretty Icons (Like: Delete, Add, Undo "Stuff like that")
P.S. Common7 has old Icons I don't like them 
TIA
|
|
|
|
|
If you're talking about the ones commonly used in Windows, they're not icons. It's an image strip (a bitmap resource) and you can find most of them in %SYSTEMROOT%\System32\browseui.dll. Open the library in Visual Studio and you'll see the resources. Expand the Bitmap category and search through the different bitmaps. It contains image strips of various resolutions and color depths. You can use ImageList.Images.AddStrip to treat them as separate images for use in ListView, ToolBar, custom classes, etc.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
 Do any one know way FolderBrowserDialog do not come up with data if you put it in a dll ???
Program Flow:
C++ unmanged -> loads a managed C# dll
C# dll creates new FolderBrowserDialog and the dialog come up
with only the two buttons no tree view !
NOTE: the same code works fine in 2000 but not in XP home !
Thanks
Jimmy B
|
|
|
|
|
Why are you loading a managed library just to use the FolderBrowserDialog? You do realize that it's just encapsulates the SHBrowseForFolder native method? It's in the shlobj.h header. See the Platform SDK for additional information.
Also, every control in System.Windows.Forms is just a wrapper for Windows Common Controls, just FYI.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Its not just to open FolderBrowserDialog, thats just whats not working !
there are a lot of other functionality its a plugin in system.
Jimmy B
|
|
|
|
|
Someone posted a message here not too long before you posted this about some incompatibilities or bugs or something with 2000. Perhaps the converse is that what's required to make it work in Win2K causes it to not work in WinXP, although I'd find that strange. He said he found the information at http://support.microsoft.com[^]. You might look there to see if there are any bugs that might cause this odd behavior.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
) 