|
It depends to a certain extent on what "non zero numbers" means, exactly. Does it mean 0 only and exactly, or does it have to not match 0. 0.0 0.00 etc.
For the simple case of a just excluding a zero we can use the following perl regex:
^[-+]?([1-9]\d+|[1-9]+.|\d*.\d+|0?.\d+)$
I've anchored this on line start and end ^ ... $, but you might have other requirements. This will match e.g 1.2 -15 0.03 .12 15. and -0.3, and does not accept any of ., 0, 0., or 1.2.3. However it does accept 0.0, 0.00, etc, and I have not yet found a way to eliminate them from the pattern. There might be a way using lookahead/lookbehind matches Lookahead and Lookbehind Tutorial—Tips &Tricks, but so far I haven't been able to figure out how to tell the regex engine that the lookahead/behind should match the entire pattern. For example we can eliminate 0.0 by adding a negative lookbehind regex of (?<!0.0), but this also elminates 0.03, which is not what is wanted. Maybe someone else knows how to resolve this.
But maybe regex isn't the way to go. If you're working in Java or C# or C++ or ... , it's probably better to just read some input, check that the entire input parses as a number, convert to a number and then omit or complain if the value is zero - depending on what your use case is.
Keep Calm and Carry On
|
|
|
|
|
unfortunately this code is accepting 00, -0, 0.0,
I agree. I will look into handling it in JS.
Thanks for trying. Appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
If I have string
1213 494 4 toobad boys 1234 4444
I want to match "bad boys" and everything before and after bad boys until word boundary \b.
Something like this
"\\b.+?bad boys.+?\\b"
This returns
1213 494 4 toobad boys
and I want it to match "toobad boys"
I know that the problem is "\\b.+?bad" which matches everything up to "bad boys", but instead it has to match everything before "bad boys" until word boundary \b.
Help?
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is that your first \b is matching too early.
Try something like [A-Za-z]*bad boys[A-Za-z]*
In words, that will match "none or some alphabetic characters (no spaces!)" then "bad boys" then "none or some alphabetic characters"
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I can't place [A-Za-z] since there will be also a non-Latin characters.
It has to be .+
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I think
\w*bad boys\w* will do it.
It's MySQL Regex expression, and it seems that it works for both Latin and non-Latin characters.
|
|
|
|
|
What is Perl regex anchor to merely match at the position where the previous match ended, as anchor \G matches at the position where the previous match ended, and also at the first match attempt the \G matches at the start of the string in the way \A does.
|
|
|
|
|
Grateful to God who guide me to the best path
Perl's way
(?!^)\G
or
(?!\A)\G
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am learning Regex.
I use Regex for a file-searching programme in Linux. (FSearch)
I do not understand, why we need ?= in Regex.
It looks for me like ?= is needless.
Why do I think so?
Here is an example:
abc(?=.*xyz)
But isn't this exactly the same like:
abc.*xyz
So actually my question is:
Can you give me an example, where ?= is really needed, because I can not get the same result without ?= ?
Would appreciate some answers.
Thank you.
modified 17-Jul-22 7:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the link.
In the meantime I think, I have found out, what the difference is between
abc(?=.*xyz) and abc.*xyz
We have 4 elements:
1. The regex search command string
2. The strings (e.g. the names of the files).
3. The strings that had a result (e.g. the file names that have a result).
4. The result for each string (The match within each string)
2-3 are the same for both abc(?=.*xyz) and abc.*xyz.
But 4. is different.
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to experiment with your expression, Google for "Expresso 3". It's free and an indispensable tool for understanding regular expressions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello I was trying to understand how to work with a regex expression for when a User enters starts typing in 600 in the input field, then populate the error message. What would be the regex code for that?
Currently I have `^[\w'\-,.][^0-9_!¡?÷?¿\/\\+=@#$%ˆ&*(){}|~<>;:[\]]{2,}$`
|
|
|
|
|
Do you really need all that just to capture "600"?
|
|
|
|
|
thank you for your reply:
Main thing is if customer enters a credit card like 1111222233334444 that is ok, but if customer enters a credit card number that starts with 600 and then other characters then it should be validated. ex: 6001222233334444
|
|
|
|
|
In that case it would be easier just to check if the first 3 characters are "600"; and you can do that with a simple string method in most languages.
|
|
|
|
|
How would I do that? I tried with
^600 but it instead it didnt show that error but got rid of it. I want to show the error when customer enters 600 first and any numbers after.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you're specifying the pattern for valid values, rather than invalid values.
Try:
^([^6]|6[^0]|60[^0]) Regexper[^]
regex101: build, test, and debug regex[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you need a regex for such a simple test?
if (text.substring(0, 3).equals("600"))
...
|
|
|
|
|
Friends,
I am using PowerShell.
I am trying to write a regex match pattern for a string that has ALL these qualifications:
1. Must have one and only one period in the string.
A. At least one Alpha, A-Za-z before the period.
B. At least one Alpha, A-Z Za-z after the period.
2. The last character in the string must be numeric, 0-9 No Alpha, A-Za-z
3. The second-to-the-last character must be one of these two:
A. May be Alpha, , A-Z Za-z or
B. May be numeric, 0-9
4. No Numerics, 0-9 Allowed except the last two characters in the string.
Examples of good ones:
Joe.Jones1
Joe.Jones01
J.J1
j.j99
jo.jn01
jo.j1
I have written many small pieces of code that could be pieced together using -AND for many matches but surely there is a way to make some one-liner that can incorporate all of these.
I may be able to do it using -AND like this:
$test -notmatch “[0-9]” -AND $test -NOTmatch “[\.]" -AND $test -match “[a-zA-Z]" -AND $test -NOTmatch “[@#$%^&*()]"
But I would like to be eloquent and do something like this:
$GoodPatternCheck = $PossibleGoodName -match '.+,.+,.+,.+'
If ( $GoodPatternCheck )
I have written many short matches in my learning process which I plan on sharing with my co-workers who are also novices.
I don't see any way to attach a file here, so here is an example of the kinds of short piece of code I write and test to help me learn:
$test = "Now......... is t.he, tim,e"
Write-Host ‘$test’ $test
$Count = ($test.Split('\.')).count -1
Write-Host ‘$test’ $test
Write-Host ‘$Count’ $Count
Thank you in advance for your help on this.
-- modified 12-Jun-22 10:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
You may need to tweak bits of this to suit PowerShell's regex engine, but the idea should work.
[A-Za-z]+\.[A-Za-z]+[A-Za-z0-9]?[0-9]
In words: one or more alpha, a literal period, one or more alpha, an optional alphanumeric, one numeric.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Peter, you must be some kind of genius! I thought it would take days for somebody to figure this out. Here is what works on my PowerShell ISE:
'[A-Za-z]'+'[\.]' + '[A-Za-z]+[A-Za-z0-9]?[0-9]'
Perfect! Thanks!
Now I will go study what the question mark means ?
|
|
|
|
|
"As few as possible"
Is you are going to play with Regular Expressions, then you need a tool. Get a copy of Expresso[^] - it's free, and it examines and generates Regular expressions.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
