|
What about something like:
COpenTrack::COpenTrack()
{
trackSwitch[0] = CTrackSwitch(0,2,8,4),
trackSwitch[1] = CTrackSwitch(4,6,10,6),
...
}
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
David,
it works, but it is "not cool", just "plain" variable initialization.
I did try to initialize the whole array in default constructor and it did not fly.
I would probably get more descriptive error messages from some other IDE to figure it out.
It should be same syntax I used for the CTrackSwitch, but I thing the array is messing it up.
....
int iNormal; // passing thru
int iReverse; // turning
int iInputTrack; //
int iSwitch; // may be usefull elesewhere
// initialize using constructor
CTrackSwitch(int iNormalInit,int iReverseInit,int iInputTrackInit, int iSwitchInit )
{
iNormal = iNormalInit;
iReverse = iReverseInit;
iInputTrack = iInputTrackInit;
iSwitch = iSwitchInit;
}
....
This is one attempt which actually compiled
COpenTrack(class CTrackSwitch() )
{
trackSwitch[10] = CTrackSwitch();
}
but I could not get the constructor to work.
Oh well, thanks for your help.
Cheers Vaclav
|
|
|
|
|
In C++11 you should be able to use an initializer list just as you did in your local variable example. See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/161790/initialize-a-const-array-in-a-class-initializer-in-c[^]
That said, of course your compiler needs to support it before you can use that syntax.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
I have a function which recursively scans an array for a matching value and when found processes it and returns. Since it works recursively a single return obviously won't do.
I was hoping I could have a static counter of the recursive calls but have no idea how to implement multiple returns.
I am doing this on Arduino, so KISS is important to me.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks Vaclav
|
|
|
|
|
Just make the function return true if a matching value is found and false otherwise. Then, when a return of true is received, simply exit the function without further processing and this will unwind the stack.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
It is not really obvious if recursion needs multiple return statements.
It all really depends on the logic being implemented.
So if you've implemented it and are not getting the expected results, posting the relevant code should get the good people here to help you figure out the problem.
«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.
Microsoft MVP (Visual C++) (October 2009 - September 2013) Polymorphism in C
|
|
|
|
|
You may be right that I am not sure about the "returns".
But debugging in IDE which lacks debugger you kinda flying blindfolded.
I'll try different way to skin this cat!
|
|
|
|
|
1. It is always possible to make do with a single return. I'm not sure what makes you think otherwise.
2. searching an array for a matching value is a trivial operation - why did you implement it recursively? What is so difficult in your search algorithm that it prevents you from implementing it in a simple loop?
3. having a static counter for depth of recursion is a common method, and it helps catching endless recursions. But, generally speaking, static variables can cause many issues - if there is even a remote chance you're going to use multithreading sometime in the future, just forget about it! Either way, a safer method is to create a context and pass a reference (i. e. pointer in C/C++) to the recursive function. That context object may contain a counter or any other mechanism to control recursion depth, but it won't be static: it lives in the context of the thread that initialiy called the recursive function, and it won't cause conflicts when that function is called from different clients at the same time.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Stefan,
I will take another look at the process to see if I can do it using loop(s).
|
|
|
|
|
And if your array is sorted, your search can go from O(N) to O(log N).
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at this: "Recursive Functions"[^].
THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?!
-- C++ FQA Lite
|
|
|
|
|
Does anybody have an idea about how to separate or detect overlapped objects? I am currently working on a project aiming at the detection crops in the late stage of growth. I did the first step, which is the segmentation (segment the plants from the background), but I got stack with detection stage because of overlapping between two crops or more (cauliflower). By the way, I am working on Opencv and visual C++. I will be grateful for your help.
modified 22-Oct-14 12:21pm.
|
|
|
|
|
HAMUDA78 wrote: Does anybody have an idea about how to separate or detect overlapped objects?
I actually, I am currently working on a project aiming at the detection crops in the late stage of growth. I did the first step, which the segmentation (segment the plants from the background), but I got stuck with detection stage because of the overlapping between the two crops or more (cauliflower).
How is this a C/C++/MFC question?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, there is no DetectOccludedCauliflower() function in either Opencv or Visual C++.
If that is not your question, and you're instead asking for an algorithm to implement such a function, then maybe you should move this question to the algorithms subforum[^]
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I wanted to get all applications in the task manager with the names as displayed in that.
For eg. If i opened a movie from quicktime, i wanted to know the name of the file which is opened.
pls guide.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe this [^] will help.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Friends
I was using DirectshowBaseclasses samples from Windows7.1 sdk with VS2010. But After upsating on Windows8.1 with Vs2013, I am not able to find samples in Windows8.1 sdk to use directshow base classes. Basically, I am looking for CBaseVideoRenderer.
If these classes are changes to some other location, please let me know if anybody using it.
Any Help will be Appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Yogesh Sikri
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, DirectShow on Widows 8 and up are deprecated, you can continue to use source from SDK 7.1,
but pay attention, for example, DirectX are not hardware accelerated, for new project you must use
use Microsoft Windows Media Foundation new from win7
Ciao
Carlo
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Everytime I use ShellExecute to open a web page I lose the focus from the parent program (caller if the ShellExecute). Is there any way to open the page silently in the background or to regain focus back to the caller ?
Regards,
sdancer75
|
|
|
|
|
Try this: BringWindowToTop[^]
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
No, it didn't worked. Googleing on the net, I think that the problem is more complicated than just calling one Win32 API function.
Regards,
sdancer75
|
|
|
|
|
How are you calling ShellExecute()?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am calling ShellExecute like that :
ShellExecute(NULL, "open", strURL ,NULL,NULL,SW_SHOWMINNOACTIVE);
Where strURL is the URL address to open.
Regards,
sdancer75
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried other values for nShowCmd?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
