|
DavidCrow wrote: And I'm saying, what's the (compiler) problem?
It is not "working".
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: It is not "working".
You need to reply "better" than that.
If you can't be bothered giving him a sensible reply, don't expect him to help.
As we're not psychic... how do you "know" it's not working?
Does the compiler crash?
Does it give a message?
Does it claim to succeed, but you can't run the compiled program.
Those are just off the top of my head - I'm sure there are other details you can provide if getting help is at all important to you.
Iain.
Iain Clarke appears because CPallini still cares.
|
|
|
|
|
I now owe you an apology! I thought you were the OP, and missed the joke icon...
I should get more sleep...
Iain.
Iain Clarke appears because CPallini still cares.
|
|
|
|
|
 No worries. Such things happen.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Did the program ran in Vista?
If not, why?. What error happened?.
Please, give more information about it.
Demian.
"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone."
-Bjarne Stroustrup, computer science professor, designer of C++
programming language (1950- )
|
|
|
|
|
k ..i am working in one java project ..in this java project one small module done by visual c++ its creating one DLL.so we call that dll ..by using java compiler ..its working fine in XP
But in windows Vista its not compile. Because of the compiler problem thats why i regenerate the dll in vista but visual studio .net 2003 is not compatible for vista (referred in msdn) but i want to use that dll how to solve this problem...
requirements: Dont use VS2005
*****THANKS N ADVANCE****
Mathen.K
(I WILL TRY MY LEVEL BEST )
|
|
|
|
|
Why you need to compile the DLL again?.
If it runs in XP usually should run in Vista.
However, if you are trying to compile the the DLL and you can't, will help a lot, the messages the compiler throws to understand why. We can't guessing what problem you have.
Demian.
"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone."
-Bjarne Stroustrup, computer science professor, designer of C++
programming language (1950- )
|
|
|
|
|
In C++ i am creating a mutex to guard the writing to a file.
I have 4 threads that call a method in a .dll. The method in that dll, will write to a file when needed. I have a questions surrounding the mutex. First off :
1. Do i use CreateMutex or OpenMutex
2. If i use CreateMutex, can someone guide me on where to find the
attribute list for the 1st parameter.
3. On both Create and Open Murtex, the last parameter 'LPCSTR' is supposed
to be a name of the mutex. Can i just create any name? Should it
be a GUID?
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
LCI wrote: I have 4 threads that call a method in a .dll
If you want only intraprocess synchronisation, IMHO then go for CriticalSection, and don't bother about the Mutex questions.
|
|
|
|
|
I used this same concept for writing to another file and had no issues.
Here is what i do:
HANDLE hmutex = OpenMutex(MUTEX_ALL_ACCESS. FALSE, TEXT("2354fg-45gefgg"));
if (NULL != hMUTEX)
{
WaitforSingleObject(hMutex, INFINITE);
Begin writing to file
}
ReleaseMutex(hMutex);
CloseHandle(hMutex);
Looks like the mutex returns null so i never get to write to my file.
Maybe there is something wrong with the name(third parameter)??
|
|
|
|
|
OpenMutex get the mutex Handle for an existing mutex. You must have a Mutex Created with CreateMutex. what about Critical section?
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCI wrote: 1. Do i use CreateMutex or OpenMutex
In the thread initializations, use CreateMutex(). If the mutex already exists then you'll get a
handle to it and GetLastError() returns ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS. If it's a new mutex you'll still get
a handle to it.
As others have mentioned, you don't need a named mutex if your threads are all in the same process -
which includes your DLL.
LCI wrote: 2. If i use CreateMutex, can someone guide me on where to find the
attribute list for the 1st parameter.
Windows security is beyond the scope of this board, but there is documentation[^]
Pass NULL if in doubt.
LCI wrote: . On both Create and Open Murtex, the last parameter 'LPCSTR' is supposed
to be a name of the mutex. Can i just create any name? Should it
be a GUID?
You can use a GUID (converted to a character string). Any unique string.
But again, no need for a named mutex if you only have one process - you can use a critical section instead.
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a TCHAR string i want to retrieve first element of this string.
Which API i should use for getting this....
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
TCHAR firstChar = yourTCharString[0];
|
|
|
|
|
neha.agarwal27 wrote: i want to retrieve first element of this string.
what do you mean by element, may be the first token seperated by delimiters.
Specify exactly what you need.
|
|
|
|
|
pls help me to Get the caption of active window...
::GetActiveWindow()->GetWindowText(strCap); //ERROR
error C2039: 'GetWindowTextA' : is not a member of 'HWND__'
c:\program files\microsoft visual studio\vc98\include\windef.h(195) : see declaration of 'HWND__'
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what exactly are you trying to do. But for the code you've posted I see the following:
GetActiveWindow() return a HWND handle, there are not members functions to access from it. So, after saving your handle like this:
HWND hwnd = GetActiveWindow();
Then you could call GetWindowText like this:
GetWindowText(hwnd, strCap, sizeof(strCap))
Demian.
"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone."
-Bjarne Stroustrup, computer science professor, designer of C++
programming language (1950- )
|
|
|
|
|
Or he can combine them into one:
GetWindowText(GetActiveWindow(), strCap, sizeof(strcap)); That assumes that strcap is a definitive size. The last parameter may need to change if it happens to be a CString or strring or pointer to some buffer.
Good luck.
Karl - WK5M
PP-ASEL-IA (N43CS)
PGP Key: 0xDB02E193
PGP Key Fingerprint: 8F06 5A2E 2735 892B 821C 871A 0411 94EA DB02 E193
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah, of course.
Demian.
"I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my
telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone."
-Bjarne Stroustrup, computer science professor, designer of C++
programming language (1950- )
|
|
|
|
|
ptr_Electron wrote: ::GetActiveWindow()->GetWindowText(strCap); //ERROR
use CWnd::GetActiveWindow()
|
|
|
|
|
Rajkumar R wrote: use CWnd::GetActiveWindow()
Only if he is using MFC. 
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
see this, ::GetActiveWindow()->GetWindowText(strCap); //ERROR
It looks like calling a member function using a class instance, possibly CWnd * (from GetActiveWindow), and :: makes the Global scope rather CWnd.
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: Only if he is using MFC
I implicitly telling him to move to MFC.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajkumar R wrote: I implicitly telling him to move to MFC.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Rajkumar R wrote: I implicitly telling him to move to MFC.
Why this bad suggestion?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
