|
I have a custom HOSTS-file on my main system. But I tried with another PC without any filtering and the issue remains.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
It was just a guess (as you mentioned we are all guessing  )
Maybe Chris has tightened the criteria in the wrong direction (two actual MVP's can't vote and Bill was one last year).
|
|
|
|
|
Can you vote now?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Found and fixed the issue. Deploying now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
This: Read excel file and generate a pdf for each row in the excel sheet - CodeProject[^]
Is in the article moderation queue, and shows as:
This is a new version of the currently published question.
Article Moderation: Should this article be published?
An article is typically either a tutorial that allows someone to learn about a technique or technology, or an explanation and documentation for code that you are uploading. Articles outline the problem you're trying to solve, the techniques you're using, and a simple explanation of how to use your code or techniques. Interesting gotcha's or trivia are always welcome.
Does this item match the definition of article clear?
Is purpose and goal of the article clear?
Could the article help someone in their day-to-day work?
Is the code and methodology explained?
Is the formatting (text, code, images) OK?
Is it appropriate and acceptable?
Approve or report this article: report
Purpose: to stop the publication of obviously inappropriate material, plagiarized content or articles that are clearly not an actual article. If the author has genuinely tried to provide a decent article, even if they may need some encouraging to improve it, then let it through. Read more...
Hello Everyone,
I would like create a tool to generate a PDF for each Row data in the excel sheet using c#.net , i have data in excel sheet like
Hide Copy Code
ID Name salary PA TA balance Email
1 AA 5000 500 30 4470 ABC@gmail.com
2 bb 5456 552 23 4553 cv@gmail.com
now i would like to read above excel by row by row and have to generate the pdf for each row by ID column . can any one help me on this?
What I have tried:
License
This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)
Share
Not quite sure what happened there...but I'll add a request that it not be closed to hopefully preserve any info for you.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I also doubt the same after seeing 'What i have tried' section there.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
And somebody has deleted it...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like OP himself removed it. I advised him to post it in QA.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately I can't really tell what happened there.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I tried to get the evidence preserved...
Oh well, maybe next time 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 4-Mar-16 19:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 4-Mar-16 19:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 4-Mar-16 19:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 4-Mar-16 19:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 4-Mar-16 19:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 4-Mar-16 19:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Can we dump it please.
Too few of the posters use it the way it's intended, example: Error in my stored procedure[^]
Just two code dumps. This is getting extra irritating in those few cases where the codedumps actually differ, I have to read through both just in case.
Could we instead have a "popup" when they press the "post" button, with a couple of checkboxes asking:
- Have you described under what circumstances the problem occurs?
- If there was an error message, have you included it?
- Have you included the affected code
- Have you stated what you tried?
This won't make any difference for the cases where the user is simply to stupid, but when they just didn't think all the way it might.
|
|
|
|
|
The question isn't a question. It's a code dump and it should be closed as "Not a question".
If you can think of a general case where asking someone to describe what they have tried will actually be detrimental I'm happy to listen. For now please consider the case where someone doesn't wish to spend a few very short moments writing an answerable question as a sign that the question should be removed.
I'm not after a perfect question, perfect grammar, perfect anything. I'm asking for some basic effort in asking a question.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I agree.
But there are actually many questions where code is posted in the "What have you tried" section or even both sections. It seems that many users don't realise the intention of this section and think it to be something like "I have tried to solve this programming problem by writing this piece of code".
How about a hint that code has to be placed in the "Describe the problem" section?
Like:
Describe the problem (add code here if necessary), or
Describe the problem (show related code here), or
Describe the problem and show related code
What have you tried (no code please), or
What have you tried to solve your problem, or
hope that the description of the first section indicates that no code should be posted here.
|
|
|
|
|
What JA & JA both mean, essentially, is that there are illiterates trying to answer illiterates questions ...
If the illiterates would ignore this waste of time to begin with they'd actually improve the answerability of going to QA legitimately recognizing a post and poster who's NOT wasting anybody's time but just needs a quick answer.
So stop short of removing QA in it's entirety and just get rid of the new partition text making a full reversion to the previous state.
This is a tell. Not a rant. 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe consider having that popup which Jörgen suggested additionally?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
That's then managing for the worst case, instead of making it easier for those who know what they are doing.
The goal here isn't to make it so hard that only those really, really desperate will post. The goal is to provide simple tools to help someone ask the question correctly, while also allowing moderators to quickly identify and remove questions that have had zero effort put in.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
