|
Thanks Luc, I have altered the reference to Liposuction, which I think is more relevant.
best, Bill
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool." Richard Feynman
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When I'm typing or editing a long message, the vertical scroll bar kicks in as it should. I'm scrolled down a few pages with something highlighted and move the mouse out of the editor and whamo, the editor loses vertical position and caret position and goes to some random location (usually the top of the page).
|
|
|
|
|
JSOP was experiencing this with IE7. I've never been able to replicate it. Which browser are you using?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
IE8 & IE9.
You know what it might be? If the mouse innocently moves over the hot buttons at the button perhaps. The B I U S small BIG, etc. That does seem to mess up the scroll position, but I wasn't able to dupe on my home PC where it completely loses the scroll position. Home is XP & IE8. Will try to repro at work on IE9 & Win7.
|
|
|
|
|
One thing I have been able to replicate is that, when clicking outside of the edit window, and then clicking back in, the cursor is reset to the top of the text you've entered.
I haven't been able to find any script in our code that cares about losing focus. Are you running any add-ins that may cause the focus to be lost?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I searched here, and noticed SA Kryukov raised this question before, but did not receive an answer:[^].
After the OP made a graceful apology for a remark I reported as "abuse:" I deleted the comment I made telling the OP I had reported his comment, and made another comment accepting his graceful apology, but I am concerned that I see no way to "undo" the reporting of the message as "abuse."
In the spirit of "all's well that ends well," I'd like to make sure no negative "remnant" (blue glow of Cerenkov radiation ?) is left behind for posterity (posteriority ?).
thanks, Bill
"Our life is a faint tracing on the surface of mystery, like the idle, curved tunnels of leaf miners on the surface of a leaf. We must somehow take a wider view, look at the whole landscape, really see it, and describe what's going on here. Then we can at least wail the right question into the swaddling band of darkness, or, if it comes to that, choir the proper praise." Annie Dillard
|
|
|
|
|
Top-notch idea. Like in the orginal thread, I've accidentally reported one member.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this needs to be added.
[Edit: progress a few steps]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified 13-Feb-12 11:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a number of files, and you click the rename button for example the last file, it tries to rename the first file, by showing the enter box against the first file and not the one you want to rename. It does this on both the first step file list, and the second step file list.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the report. We're working on revamping the submission wizard as we speak.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the servers had a bad case of ASP.NET indigestion.
We use WebForms (yeah, old school) and one of the issues is that web controls and pages get compiled in an order that can sometimes get things mixed up. A page can suddenly become convinced that a webcontrol simply doesn't exist because that control may have been compiled as part of a different page and the wiring gets screwed up.
This generally happens at deploy time, but it sorts itself out quickly (or I kick it firmly). Once it's compiled that's it - no more problems.
However, for some reason the pages completely forgot who they were wired up to and we had that error happen. No deploy, no recompile, no nothing. Just spontaneous craziness.
I'm forcing a full recompile now that will fix it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In Q&A the "Add a Solution" button appears directly below the question, before the "Have a Question or Comment". This seems the wrong way round to me.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted to make is so that those who could answer the question immediately could quickly get to where they needed to be without having to scroll through (potentially) a lot of comments to find the "I know the answer! Let me answer it!" button. Doing it this way means the button is always in the same relative place to the question.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, that seems to make a lot of sense. 
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Can Signature be added automatically while replying to the question or even reply on comment ?
If not then can we have this as Future Feature ?
Hope this helps ,otherwise revert back with your queries
--Rahul D.
|
|
|
|
|
No, not at present.
And I suspect that the answer will be "No" to having it as a future feature, for the same reason that the Smiley list is not displayed for answers or comments - they are there for forums, where things are a bit more informal, rather than Q&A where the aim is to be professional and help, rather than entertain.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: for forums, where things are a bit more informal, rather than Q&A where the aim is to be professional
I won't surprise you by telling you I resent that statement.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Fed up by FireFox memory leaks I switched to Opera and now CP doesn't perform its paste magic, so links will not be offered. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't! 
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that is what I said.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Fed up by FireFox memory leaks I switched to Opera and now CP doesn't perform its paste magic, so links will not be offered. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
Were you formally telling him that?
|
|
|
|
|
As formal as it gets.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Fed up by FireFox memory leaks I switched to Opera and now CP doesn't perform its paste magic, so links will not be offered. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Q&A where the aim is to be professional and help, rather than entertain.
Are you sure?
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
You gotta have a dream!
Even if you do get a little depressed about the quality of teaching these days. Tch! When I were a lad, we had to debug wit' two rocks and a Mammoth hide. But you try t' tell 'em that, they won't believe you!
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
