|
This is called expediency. To indicate whether you had bookmarked a given item would require an extra database call for each page view so we punted and left it non-indicating on page refresh.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Got it. Thanks for the clarification (and for the new word to my vocabulary  )
|
|
|
|
|
Here a bunch of things which I have been experiencing for about a week:
- Clicking on the "New Message" Button in a forum does not always work. When it does not work, I must reload the page.
- The site returns "Unexpected behavior CP returned something"-ish kind of messages when posting. Sometimes my post does really appear on the forum, sometimes not.
- The CSS loads completely only every other time, meaning I have to reload the page to get it properly displayed.
Is it only me ?
FF8.0, WinXP
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Clicking on the "New Message" Button in a forum does not always work.
I can confirm this as well.
WinXP, Chrome
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: (2011)
Good idea - I can't remember how old my sig quotes are ... too late ...
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Clicking on the "New Message" Button in a forum does not always work.
Is that because you're clicking on the coloured area or the link itself? It's not actually a button, just a styled link. I'll fix.
Rage wrote: Unexpected behavior CP returned something
I'm not seeing anything in our error logs that has this wording. Is there a ticket number provided?
Rage wrote: The CSS loads completely only every other time, meaning I have to reload the page to get it properly displayed.
IT could be you were viewing the site during an update. Still happening? If so, it sounds like a network issue your end.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Is that because you're clicking on the coloured area or the link itself?
No, definitely the link. And it still happens.
Chris Maunder wrote: this wording.
It's not the exact wording. Just occurred to me that it could be a CPHog error message...
Chris Maunder wrote: Still happening?
Yep, several times again today. But you are right, our network is probably to be blamed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't. You've been redirected to the error page. Try clearing your cache and then go back to the page. As if by magic, it shall reappear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those articles have been deleted.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
But what about the other Report options? Still only the Approve button there. Dave posted a message here[^] about new video articles. So there should be validation(Video on Video articles) & also there should be other report options.
|
|
|
|
|
No, it was not my article.
I came across a case where I wanted to warn readers about dangerous lie on the technical matter and, in discussion, faced the accusation of the article author by the original author in plagiarism. I think this it should not be tolerated and suggested the original author would file the complain, after through check up of the fact.
(Besides, the article has poorly negative value due to technical aspects, anyway  )
But after that, I wasn't sure the way to report on plagiarism. So, what should be done?
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Each article has a report flag icon, which when you mouse over it gives the option to report an article as plagiarized. You can even fill in additional information in a comment box; such information might include a link to the original article or a link to the post in which the supposed original author made a claim that the author was plagiarized. I assume that when you put those comments in when you report an article, the plagiarism is looked into and verified.
|
|
|
|
|
A-ah, the red flag was on top, not where the voting is, one the opposite end. I failed to see it after two or three views.
Thank you very much,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
This is the right place, but you need to provide a link to the article and citations to show where it's plagiarised from. At that point the duty hamsters spring into life.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: the duty hamsters spring into life
and then go back to sleep.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. This is was a preliminary question. I'm not an author of the plagiarized work, and such author did not yet share the link to the original work. It was my suggestion to him.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for bringing this[^] to your attention. I was editing one post on Q&A and got this error when saving. I did not modify the title so I wonder why I got the error.
The subject must be between 20 and 250 characters.
I'm not sure if this validation is already on the create question page, but if it's not, can we please include it?
Signature construction in progress. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
Which post were you editing? Some snuck through the minimum requirements and are now being caught on edit.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This one.[^] I had to put a spacebar on the end of the title to save my revisions on the post.
Chris Maunder wrote: Some snuck through the minimum requirements and are now being caught on edit.
I understand now. I thought the validation was not on the create question page.
Signature construction in progress. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
The validation for tags also seem to fail for some posts. This[^] question has no tags initially but when I edited it, the validation seem to have worked.
Signature construction in progress. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw Seans article he posted earlier and then deleted within a few minutes.
During the the time of it being posted I tried to post a message to it, but it failed and I was told the article had been deleted.
However, I noticed in my recent rep list, that there is still 1 point awarded.
Seems like a bug to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Did the message posting fail or did re-loading the article to view the message you posted fail? A subtle but important difference.
Just because the item you contributed to was deleted doesn't mean you didn't contribute, so we give you the points.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm.
When the message was posted it immediately went to the "article was deleted on" page. Which was probably a redirect after the post went through, so it probably got through just before it was deleted.
Probably not a bug then, and just perfect timing!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
