|
It doesn't require a comment. You can just close the little box and vote anyway. 
|
|
|
|
|
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
5s don't require a comment. I still include a comment anyway as I think it's more encouraging to the poster.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nish,
Yeah, I agree
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Comment while voting is not a mandatory here if you are voting for 4 or 5. If you are voting less than 4, it is a must one. If you want to put just a small comment instead of voting, there is a link for that.
Don't forget to Click on [Vote] and [Good Answer] on the posts that helped you.
Regards - Kunal Chowdhury | Software Developer | Chennai | India | My Blog | My Tweets | Silverlight Tutorial
|
|
|
|
|
I am well aware of the comment widget, I just assumed (wrongly) that comments on upvotes were required as they are on downvotes. All cleared up by the previous answers.
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
this will be turned into a bug report as soon as it occurs, it is only a matter of minutes.
"Modified on ..." message sometimes breaks into sig. Have seen this happen occasionally.
EDIT1 first edit, after 3 minutes /EDIT1
EDIT2 second edit, after 6 minutes; the modified message got added correctly; it did go wrong here[^] although I did not touch the sig at all. /EDIT2
EDIT3 it seems to go wrong upon an additional edit; so the scenario is:
create message
wait 5 minutes
edit message (this adds "Modified on..." correctly)
edit message again (this throws away the original closing /div tag from the sig, probable cause is length of sig+"Modified on..." exceeds the limit)
/EDIT3
|
|
|
|
|
Well, might be the case but i am sure this will be added to the bottom of 'to-do' list. 
Who would had noticed it (other than you )! Rarely someone(that too with a long signature...) would edit his own message more than 2 times!
|
|
|
|
|
People should not be punished for conveying as much information as a sig allows, while iteratively improving their replies.
|
|
|
|
|
I fully agree with you!
It's just that I was trying to figure out the number of people, who would be facing this issue!
|
|
|
|
|
Verified and added to the bug list. Thanks Luc.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just going through our TODO and noted that this was fixed a while ago.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, fixed and improved.
|
|
|
|
|
When a user deletes another users question, where does this come in the rep system? editor or organiser or somewhere else? not clear in the faq.
|
|
|
|
|
it should remove all Participant points (deleting a question defeats the whole purpose of Q&A), and add 100 to Organizer (most questions show a lack of structure) unless the question got up-voted already.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: deleting a question defeats the whole purpose of Q&A
Not when the OP of the question, created 5 of the same question in quick succession! some identical, some with slightly different formatting, and some with slightly more info added.
Think they eventually got the message from my comments and started to use the improve question button!
|
|
|
|
|
you really should go back to your books and study some more.
|
|
|
|
|
please, give me a break, the section i'm on is; UML notation for specifying components and interfaces.
which is a part of the From model to implementation unit...........
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like fun.
|
|
|
|
|
For clarity: if an event isn't listed in the Reputation FAQ then there are no points associated with it. The Rep FAQ is a direct dumb of the database that drives rep points.
There are no points associated with deleting questions.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see any use of line numbers while browsing articles' code and when we need to copy some selected code, numbers comes too. Now, that become pain to remove all those numbers before code.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Having line numbers when looking at the code allows for easy referencing part of the code, so IMO it is good.
Not getting the linenumbers when a copy is performed obviously is what we want; AFAIK it is already on the TODO list.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Having line numbers when looking at the code allows for easy referencing part of the code
like ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
like I answer some question in some forum, and say: ..., see lines 42-49 in file xyz.cs in this article of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
until you modify your article in the future and the line numbers change and the answer to the question in some forum then becomes meaningless.
Catch-22, or should that be Try....Catch-22 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif)
Kristian Sixhoej
