|
Right, I was being facetious.
Advertising doesn't disqualify membership.
But I see as a member you take advantage of the feature while objecting to it as an advertiser, so you are part of the problem you object to.
This statement was never false.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris-Kaiser wrote: But I see as a member you take advantage of the feature while objecting to it as an advertiser, so you are part of the problem you object to.
Mainly because there's no "delete" button (as far as I can tell). Point me to the right spot and I'll delete my redundant accounts today.
|
|
|
|
|
hey, you knowhow to do it, because you already remove that idiotic "The Osmosian Order" member several months ago 
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: hey, you know how...
I'd reply, but it appears you've fallen asleep.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're expecting user counts to be anywhere near accurate on any publicly accessible board, you're pretty clueless. I don't know of any site admin that has the time to vet almost 4 million accounts to make sure there's no multi-account users.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: If you're expecting user counts to be anywhere near accurate on any publicly accessible board, you're pretty clueless. I don't know of any site admin that has the time to vet almost 4 million accounts to make sure there's no multi-account users.
Understood. But if everyone knows the thing is off - way off - what's the point of "bragging" about it?
|
|
|
|
|
stop drooling honorable members with such post you're the only one to excrete 
|
|
|
|
|
Have I offended you in some personal way? It seems the first thing you do when you get here each day is locate all of my posts and vote them down - regardless of the content. Exactly what's the problem, and how can we fix it?
|
|
|
|
|
are you paranoid ?
i was browsing the site and as i saw the suggestion forum had new messages, i came here, and oh misery, you're still complaining at something about the Codeproject... why am i simply not surprised ?
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: are you paranoid ?
He also suffers from delusions of self-importance. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
I agree with you that my argument is useless. [Red Stateler]
Hey, I am part of a special bread, we are called smart people [Captain See Sharp]
The zen of the soapbox is hard to attain...[Jörgen Sigvardsson]
I wish I could remember what it was like to only have a short term memory.[David Kentley]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I know that you have been having trouble with the preview system of late so why not just implement it the way Shog has done it? I think that would be the easiest of all the updates to actually implement. I'm sure he would be happy to give you the source for it.
What is wrong with WYSIWYG?
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: What is wrong with WYSIWYG?
a) Some people just plain old don't like it
b) loading up the editing engine can take a bit of time, especially on slow connections
c) it may encourage HTML spam. Large, bold, colourful text splattered all over the page.
So saying, it is going to happen but I'm just so bogged down that I would rather work on fixing other things rather than working on adding additional features right at the moment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: it may encourage HTML spam. Large, bold, colourful text splattered all over the page.
We certainly don't want pages with distractingly large, bold, or colorful items like these[^], for example.
I think you've got the whole idea reversed. The background - ie, your stuff - is supposed to be subtle and unobtrusive so the content contributed by the members can catch, direct and control the reader's focus.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris that is just a sig poking fun at the whole argument. I used Shog's WYSIWYG to make that and as you will see: it is size 18 bright yellow text, which was done at the click of a button (and then changing 7 to 18)
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
In the lounge I just replied to 'guiqul163' inline with Simmon's post. Now first off note that it is positioned as though I had posted to John directly, but then on further inspection look at the subject....
Something just went crunch.
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mate Chris is all powerful, right under Bob, I'm sure he could locate it 
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: Chris is all powerful,
Indeed, but what if he hasn't had his ![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif) or a proper ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) yet?
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
S Douglas wrote: had his or a proper yet?
Then we are all doomed!
Brad
Australian
- Captain See Sharp on "Religion"
any half intelligent person can come to the conclusion that pink unicorns do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: Then we are all doomed!
I'm sure if ![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif) discovers Chris messing with the servers without having consumed the proper drink yet there will be adverse consequences.
This doesn’t quite count as post padding does it?
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
S Douglas wrote: This doesn’t quite count as post padding does it
Not by my standards it doesn't
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: Not by my standards it doesn't
I thought Australians only had standards covering beer?
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
That and women.
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
