|
My messages too had been voted down in vc++ form for no reasons.
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Nish. You help out quite a bit, and I nod my head quite a bit when I read your answers. Just ignore the dorks that do the dasterdly deeds. You're better than they, anyway.
"we must lose precision to make significant statements about complex systems."
-deKorvin on uncertainty
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't let the voting bother you too much,
In the programming forum there are four kinds of voters,
* The ones who vote you a high mark for giving a correct or useful answer
* The ones who vote you down for giving a useless or incorrect answer
* The people who vote answers down because they were looking for easy answers to questions they couldn't be arsed thinking about and when you challenge them to think by asking for more information or providing an indirect answer that upsets them.
* Trolls who like to give low votes to high-profile members because it makes them feel good to belittle valued members of the community.
Your recent (and much deserved) placement in the helpful people hall of fame, probably upset one of the tiny minds and are post-stalking you.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Never before saw the term "post-stalking." I like it.
"we must lose precision to make significant statements about complex systems."
-deKorvin on uncertainty
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Think he is flamed for having unconventional sig.
-Prakash
-- modified at 8:10 Friday 13th January, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
voting system already implemented it,will it not be good to implement in forum module as well,right now ,it seems that page loads all main posts and reply in one request,takes time,implementing ajax will increase server requests but i think it will get faster too(no additional query) ?
|
|
|
|
|
Adnan Siddiqi wrote: voting system already implemented it,will it not be good to implement in forum module as well,right now ,it seems that page loads all main posts and reply in one request,takes time,implementing ajax will increase server requests but i think it will get faster too(no additional query) ?
well it will shift the problem from the webserver to database server.
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
|
As mentioned in the newsletter it's been removed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: As mentioned in the newsletter it's been removed.
I didnt get any newsletter for a while. Anyways, I guess that link from http://www.codeproject.com/info/stuff.asp should be removed too.
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know the reason for getting the error on line 246 "Unexpected method or property"? I get this message from IE6 every time I open any Code Project page. I got tired of refusing to debug the pages evry time I'm on Code Project....
|
|
|
|
|
|
you can disable those messages by checking "Disable script debugging" in options tab unless you need it for web development.
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
i get a JS error every time i hover over the "Help! Articles Message Boards..." toolbar.
something about "HooverBold undefined"
as a result, i haven't been able to get to the StoreFront in quite a while (to check for VS05)
Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
|
|
|
|
|
Still?? Have you tried a Ctrl+F5? That issue should have been long gone.
And BTW - we *just* got final confirmation that we will be able to get VS2005 Pro. Hopefully we'll have it on the store by the weekend.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm it works at home, but not at work.
it could be the (crappy) proxy server they use - it has a tendency to cache and re-serve .JS files forever...
i'll just do it from home
Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that it's somewhat difficult to determine what kind of license code on codeproject.com is offered under. There is a vague description of what kind of rights are expected from the author when submitting code in the "Submit Code" page, but not much else. And it appears that the only way to determine what kind of license the code is provided under, is to download the code, and try to find a license statement somewhere (which, in some cases, doesn't appear to exist).
It seems like it would be much more clear, and easier, if codeproject were to simply put a statemtent on the download pages to the effect of (for example) "codeproject.com code is distributed under the MIT (or BSD, or whatever) license, unless the author has specifically indicated another license which his/her code will be distributed under." That would make the legal status of the code much more clear, and allow people to reuse the code under clear conditions, without worrying about legal entanglements.
I imagine that the submission process would have to include some sort of click-through acceptance of this by the author as well..
Cheers!
-Brett
|
|
|
|
|
|