|
In Q&A section: Today while editing one of the question, i saw few articles as suggestions. Initially it was just titles but now title, last posted and Votes too!
Though i found a little issue which looks like misleading UI stuff. All the entries are marked and showed as 'Article'. At times, its a blog entry/tip-trick/Q&A itself! But all are shown as article.
Is this fine?
It looks like the caption should be specific or else no point of showing it at all!
|
|
|
|
|
Nice catch! I'll add it to the list. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had to uncheck yesterday, and since then it will not recheck.
That is it will if I recheck for this post, but the next one will revert back to unchecked.
Why is it not fixing as checked?
MOD
Cleared Cache it it appears fine again.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
modified on Thursday, March 25, 2010 5:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
When posting a reply, the 'Use HTML in this post' check box, but it is resolved
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted, what is perhaps the first Windows Phone 7 article, and I noticed there wasn't WP7 specific categories yet. I think a new section and categories should be added. WP7 will be rather huge I expect.
|
|
|
|
|
I think a Mobile Development section under articles, with the following categories
Apple
Android Phones
Windows 7
Windows 6.5
PDAs
Miscellaneous
I wonder, can you write and distribute iPhone apps without being "managed" through the Apple Store? If not, the "Apple" category wouldn't be viable.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I expect iPhone app developers can create, modify and download (I trust Apple calls that differenly, probably upload) whatever they choose, as they have installed the development tools to do so; IMO it is only app customers that need to go through the App Store channels. If so, an iPhone section could be viable.
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC when I looked at the iPhone stuff when it first came out I had to check some sort of NDA. I can't remember now exactly what it covered (if there was one and I'm not mistaken). I always take screen dumps of stuff like that so I'll have a look through my archive and see what I can find.
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
If there was one, I didn't save it
If Chris wants to investigate, it's probably worth dropping an email to CG as he was involved in a large iPhone app at one time (yes - iPhone development sucked! ).
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
An iPhone section should be viable. The NDA will take some reading, but we're hopeful.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'll read it, the section that is, not the NDA.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not too sure about the 30 Character limit in QA:
http://www.codeproject.com/answers/68180/what-is-Serilizable.aspx[^]
The OP had to paste the question several times to get around it. I answered a question (along the lines "Can I do this ..... ?" ) with a "Yes" a while back, but had to pad it out also.
Do the benefits of the limits outweigh the costs?
Dalek Dave: There are many words that some find offensive, Homosexuality, Alcoholism, Religion, Visual Basic, Manchester United, Butter.
Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: The OP had to paste the question several times to get around it.
He really only had to post it once. The original question is over 30 chars.
Keith Barrow wrote: Do the benefits of the limits outweigh the costs?
I'd say so. We want to encourage descriptive questions. 30 characters is a pretty low margin - though there may be some rare, legitimate cases.
|
|
|
|
|
Thiru Thirunavukarasu wrote: there may be some rare, legitimate cases
In which case, they can just add something like "thanks in advance".
|
|
|
|
|
Need Porsche. Thanks in advance.
123456789012345678901234567890
yes, it fits.
|
|
|
|
|
No it wasn't! The question was edited from:
what is [Serilizable]
== 21 Characters.
Dalek Dave: There are many words that some find offensive, Homosexuality, Alcoholism, Religion, Visual Basic, Manchester United, Butter.
Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same guy is posting similar questions in the Silverlight forum under different aliases).
Help!!
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?fid=1159&tid=3413521[^]
The post by "RogelioP / BASIC-Pascal-C-Logo Spoken Here" with his three line name has the posty type icon a full line below the subject. At first glance it looks like there's a subjectless post immediately below his.
Edit: FF3.5.3
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Now I know why John Simmons post subject looks different.
|
|
|
|
|
I know this stuff comes from sponsors, and there m ight be a bit of politics involved, but...
I appreciate the software, but I really have no use for most of it. (Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly gonna download it. )
My employer doesn't use any of it (in fact, I've never had an employer that used any of it), and it feels kinda strange to include (or consider including) the DDLs in CP articles. In other words, there's no real incentive to actually use any of it.
What are the chances of getting Microsoft to provide things like a MSDN subscription (the $1199 one), the Expression Pro subscription, Windows 7 Ultimate, Visual Studio, Expression Suite, MS Office, or something like that?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for brining this topic up. I almost forgot about mentioning it. When i won the Best ASP.NET article competition some time back, i got licences of few thrid party controls for an year. It was of no use to me and got wasted. Those controls were not used in my projects and i had hardly downloaded all.
I am sure CP must had recieved such response earlier too. It's just that including something more generic might be more useful and encouraging.
|
|
|
|