|
If I sign out I can replicate the issue.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Strange I have it while signed in.
Maybe some sort of permission issue or something?
because you have to sign out or because you now have been able to replicate the issue and thus have to fix it?
|
|
|
|
|
bacause it's been a long week, this is an important bug, and I really need some sleep
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So get some sleep
I promise the bug will still be there tomorrow when you wake up
I know the feeling
Haven't had a good night sleep in months now
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see the next / previous buttons. Something is not right.
|
|
|
|
|
Would be nice to have a button to enable an author to remove their article(s) from the website.
Martin Cook
Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6
|
|
|
|
|
It's not exactly a request we get everyday, though we will always abide by an author's wishes.
Is there something we've done wrong, or not done well enough? If there's an issue we'll certainly do whatever we can to fix the problem.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No, not at all...
I think my articles may all be somewhat dated at this point. I was considering pulling some of them off the site when I noticed there wasn't a way to do that.
Martin Cook
Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6
|
|
|
|
|
What you consider dated, and what the dev stuck using Visual Studio 2003, or VB6 considers dated are two very different things.
I strongly encourage old articles to stay. We're not all bleeding edge, and even if an article is old, the techniques are often timeless.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: even if an article is old, the techniques are often timeless.
Well said.
|
|
|
|
|
I have stuff on here that's 10 years old. I wouldn't worry about your stuff being dated.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Martin, I went through your article list to see if I could pick out what you would consider dated.
I work in a company that has legacy code going from old vb6 COMs to dotNet4 encompassing every version of studio along the way. Your articles are far from outdated as resources on the older technologies becomes harder and harder to find, so I would agree with Chris that the relevance for your articles is still there.
Cheers
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Most of us who've been here for a while have older articles that are now obsolete. I don't think they need to be deleted. Otherwise we'd only always have articles from the last 2 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Any article can come in handy.
People are always working on all kinds of 'old' technology.
I would request you to let your articles stay (unless you absolutely dont want them to be around).
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
|
|
|
|
|
Just to add my tuppence worth: Sometimes the older articles are the most useful - because when you have a problem there are very few people still using the technology to ask for help...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
See THIS[^] question.
You will see useless
<int><int> at the end of code there.
Now Edit the question and remove both <int><int>, It's showing fine in preview but after updating it comes back again.
Now is it a browser problem ? (Chrome 8.0)
I've seen a lot of time when there is List<String> then it adds <string><string> at the end of code automatically.
above Problem was also with answer given by me yesterday HERE[^].
Someone has deleted my answer(Somebody is misusing his/her power). Was it anything wrong with it ?
Regards,
Hiren.
be good(Help people in CP) ,do good(Vote if one finds helpful) all will happen good, In case happens bad(You are getting downvote for your best try to help OP) it will be good for later after(Countered with more points by humble member). - Gita sar in context of CP.
-So Guys don't care about downvote believe in you.
modified on Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: Now is it a browser problem ?
No. Not a browser problem. Infact not a problem at all.
Have a look at my reply here[^] - similar issue/doubt reported earlier. It's not a bug.
Hiren Solanki wrote: Someone has deleted my answer(Somebody is misusing his/her power). Was it anything wrong with it ?
Just repost your answer again. Looks like, your comment was confusing and you wanted to delete your answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok sandeep it's just an encoding problem.
Sandeep Mewara wrote: Just repost your answer again. Looks like, your comment was confusing and you wanted to delete your answer.
My actual comment was
"I dont know why <string><string> is coming though I am deleting it. please ignore it."
But I have not encoded > and < in my comment so it misprinted like
"I dont know why is coming though I am deleting it. please ignore it."
And some body deleted it.
Ok I know that's not a problem with who deleted that's just Encoded misunderstanding between.
Regards,
Hiren.
be good(Help people in CP),do good(Vote if one finds helpful) all will happen good, In case happens bad(You are getting downvote for your best try to help OP) it will be good for later after(Countered with more points by humble member). - Gita sar in context of CP.
-So Guys don't care about downvote believe in you.
|
|
|
|
|
The editor is trying to resolve what it thinks is html tags. If you go in and escape the pointy brackets in the message, it'll be fine.
I already did this in the OP of the cited question.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks John, After reading solution provided by Sandeep before, I got to know about.
Regards,
Hiren.
-"I don't know, I don't care, and it doesn't make any difference".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, both dealt with
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Under setting I noticed that Technical blogs was unchecked so I checked it. The result was that my reputation was reduced by 150 points. Three "Newsletter opt-in (undo)" appeared under my repitation history all at 20 Jan 2011 1:08 AM. I am sure that something is wrong here. I tried unchecking ot to see if that would reverse this odd process but it had no effect.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Same for me too. I did not even change my newsletter settings. I changed my screen ID, saved and bam! -50 points for newsletter opt-in undo.
|
|
|
|