|
Those lucky messages that survive the moderation displays age from the release date and not from the original creation date, but in the list of siblings according the original post date...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Those lucky messages that survive the moderation displays age from the release date
This was done because we decided a message was "posted" when it was released, not when it was written and held in the pending queue.
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: but in the list of siblings according the original post date...
List of siblings? Not sure what you mean.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: My post is 'younger' than that of OG (because it went into moderation), but still listed before (it was truly posted before)...It confusing
Fixed (for the future)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think so - thanks mate, Chris has dealt with it - hopefully Ive helped her and not stuffed up anything
|
|
|
|
|
It's back in the pending queue and will be available soon
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
thanks - wasn't sure how to help her - next time she can do her own barking
|
|
|
|
|
I posted a reply in the lounge and there was no error, but the message did not show up in the thread. I tried it again and got the same result. On checking my messages, it shows the two messages as 'not publicly visible'.
Wazzup?
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Spam filter...Since yesterday it got a bit crazy...
In second thought - and in your case - it come to its senses...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You are clearly a spammer, so they went to the spam moderation queue.
Matthew is working on it...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Wazzup? The new "FigLeaf" filter from iShaltKnowShame.va considers Hungarians inherently naked and has done the necessary ?
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
If this gets through while all of Baba's posts are fed to the Hamsters, then the filter's fine.
I think that while having a rum-baba, or several, while playing the original Desi Arnaz' rendition of "Babalou" in duet with his young son, Ricky: [^].
I will contemplate the current fearful ascendancy of the evil star Ketu's influence on CodeProject's web-site, hoping that the even more dreadful Rahu is not nearing its antipodal proximity to Earth, signifying an even more sinister misfortune.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Or worse: if Bel-Shamharoth rises, we'll all have to use Octal for the rest of our miserable lives...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Just think in which mess I'd find myself with the nickname containing not one but TWO numbers that are two times four!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
No more fermented coconut juice for Bill. He's had enough for one night.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My reputation list shows freshly posted messages as undo of themselves...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. Two posts, one to the Lounge, one to Insider News, led to hamsters-chewing-motherboards page, and then were undone with one point deducted from my rep.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
But the post are actually there (maybe with a little delay, but today all move slow)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I just noticed the posts had re-appeared, except for the previous post to this one which was an update to this thread saying the problem had, evidently, been fixed
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Approving all you guy's messages..
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Very kind of you...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Update: both messages that failed to post initially have now been posted.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|