|
Yep - it's the "+". I've fixed this and will be deploying the fix soon.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hey,
I inserted some code from VS into the new Article editor on CP and it looks great in editor but not in preview.
Image
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately the editor can get cranky with that. If you go into the HTML mode you can strip out the bad stuff. Or if you just don't want to deal with the editor email me and I would be happy to on your behalf. I've fixed the formatting for you on this one.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, but i think in future it would be nice when WYSIWYG within the editor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using an add-in or extension that copies the code as HTML? (PowerCommands or something?) This is the issue because the code is no longer pure code, it's actually marked-up code, so pasting into a PRE block makes the editor think you're pasting a HTML sample, not a C# or C++ or whatever sample.
Simple solution is to use the "Paste as plain text" button. Top row of the article editor's toolbar, 4th icon along.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That is a good point im actually using the PowerTools from MS. That will cause this error, but its still confusing that the Editor shows a Makeup that will not be the expected outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
He's just missed the "http://" from the start of the link in his biography.
Without it, the browser interprets the URL as being relative to the current page. Since the page doesn't exist on CodeProject, you get the standard "page not found" error.
It's a simple mistake by @newtonsaber; it's not a bug in the site, and there's no malicious intent.
webkitWeird is part of the CodeProject menu script. It's just a variable name; there's nothing to worry about.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks so much for explaining that.
I'm trying to figure out what I've done wrong in my bio.
I will try to fix it, but it must've been like this for a long time.
I haven't changed anything recently. Hmmm...
I thought that link to my site previously worked. I'll check it all out and fix it up.
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for letting me know about this. Appreciate it.
I'm working on fixing it right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, all fixed. I had href=newtonsaber.com -- just as was explained.
I changed it to href=http://newtonsaber.com and I believe all is good now.
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
I assumed it was just me: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5014196/Is-it-just-me.aspx[^] - but as you see, I'm not the only one. Sometimes, it can take several minutes to get a page loaded, and all you get in the meantime is a blank page.
This may have to do with the visitor numbers (currently 79,687 but I've seen >80K today which is the highest I recall seeing recently) and loading?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
There was a load issue this morning which I fixed, but it seems one of our servers is not long for this world. I've put it to bed for a while and we'll see if the others can step in for him for a bit.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My sincere condolences on your loss
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
How was it this morning? We made a *minor* change that shouldn't affect anything. Except it seemed to drop load by about 25%. We're making more changes tonight and tomorrow.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investigated and action taken.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
-- modified 3-Mar-15 20:36pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The category Article Extension would imply to the reader that the post is relative to an Article authored by the same person who posts the extension (after all, anyone can post a tip/trick relative to any article or subject).
These Article Extensions would aggregate value to the original Article, without making it boring and massive.
Also, it'd be interesting if these Article Extensions could be listed (as links), automatically, at the end of the Article, in an appropriate place.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting! I'm tempted to rename "alternative" to "extension". Not sure if both are justified.
The linking bit: yes.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a good idea, as long as na extension link is added to the article.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe this could be very useful, also just to add some sub-suggestions for consideration:
- Enable the existing Articles or Tips/Tricks to be added as Article Extensions.
- Allow author of original article to remove the extension.
- Implement it in a way that author needs to confirm that he accepts the suggested Article Extension (but I'm not too sure about this).
|
|
|
|
|
I was forced to do it and I think it is really annoying. It definitely doesn't help to create a good image of CodeProject.
|
|
|
|
|
What's the big deal about registering? I just don't see your problem!
|
|
|
|