|
There are times when people may want to break an article into shorter parts rather than one totally huge file, almost like chapters in a book. Because such articles will be related, they would often link to one another. Such articles may be posted at the same time.
My suggestion is to support a permalink feature so that when the article gets edited and moved, it does not break links that might be in other pages. This could also be used in the outside world so that permalinks could be used rather than pointing directly to the article.
|
|
|
|
|
How about posting the number of results returned from a search, so you know how many pages you might be looking at?
|
|
|
|
|
By default, the News/Info tab is selected instead of the first. Is there a reason for that? Also, instead of "latest threads" below it, could you change it to "latest whatever" based on the icon, please. I know the icon descriptions are at the bottom, but it would be easier to see the text description with the summary.
"People who want to share their religious views with you almost never want you to share yours with them." - Anonymous
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: By default, the News/Info tab is selected instead of the first. Is there a reason for that?
Helps reduce reposting the same news item/link I guess.
Regards,
Nish
|
|
|
|
|
Then maybe the summary needs to contain only links that don't appear on that page?
"Religion is assurance in numbers." - Bassam Abdul-Baki
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Then maybe the summary needs to contain only links that don't appear on that page?
Some people use 10 posts/page (I used to in India), others use 25 or 50. So it's hard to decide what a page is (though it can be shown on a per-user basis - too much extra load though). I like it better this way.
Regards,
Nish
|
|
|
|
|
Hope this is isn't redundant. When I click on the Results link to the VB .NET article competition for June the survey is displayed instead of the results. Do I now have to participate in the survey before I can see the results? Since I have an article in the competition, I prefer not to vote.
Thanks ... George
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the update of the design, the "updated" date isn't shown anymore on article pages (The "posted" date ist still there.)
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer: Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Only articles that have been updated have an "updated" date.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Makes sense I checked only two or three articles, and apparently they all were new ones
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer: Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Are they still in the plans?
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda.
I wish I could be more specific.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose there's a lot of considerations to be made for such a feature. After all, we really don't need 3431 different snippets on how ::CreateFile() works.
How about a Wiki, with predefined sections and subsections? I for one would love that.
--
Larva-Tested, Pupa-Approved
|
|
|
|
|
move the LHS skyscraper ad to the RHS.
|
|
|
|
|
How about a sticky thread in the Lounge about the site changes. It might stop the tens of threads that are being started on the subject,
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
No, it would just flood all the other lounge threads down to page 9 after a day or two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael wanted a sticky thread, not a sticky message.
--
Presented in BC [Brain Control] where available
|
|
|
|
|
A colleague of mine mentioned today that having discussions/blogging/etc can be harmful when it comes time to get a new job, because HR people search for you online to see what your personal views are. They can then silently use that information against you, "Sorry, the position has been filled (...and you're a liberal hipster with a pet cobra)."
What better place to look up how someone thinks about a wide range of topics than to go to that person's CP profile and view their message history log! I think that the message log should be restricted to CP members only. At least that would make it more of an effort for some HR person to snoop around. Perhaps there could also be a constraint, such as, you can't view a message log until you've been a member for a day or week.
What do you think?
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
No way. I firmly believe if you're going to post something in a public forum you should be willing to stand by it. Too many times people assume they are anonymous or not subject to social niceties simply because they are on the other end of an ethernet cable. I'm very much against absolving people of responsibility for their own actions.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm very much against absolving people of responsibility for their own actions.
That wasn't my objective, really. I agree that people shouldn't feel free to go around posting that people are a-holes and c-suckers. I am more concerned with an innocent statement such as "I think the war with Iraq is unnecessary." Political views like that are the type of thing that an HR person can use to filter out resumes, based on his/her personal views. There's no need to be absolved of a statement like that, it's just an opinion.
But, in the end, it's your site, so, whatever.
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Josh Smith wrote:
What do you think?
If you don't want somebody to read it, then don't post it on the internet. I actually like that potential employeers can read what I write here at CP. Anybody who doesn't want to hire me because of my views isn't the kind of person I want to work for anyway.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote: Anybody who doesn't want to hire me because of my views isn't the kind of person I want to work for anyway.
When interviewing at a small company I agree with that. But when interviewing at a large company that idea doesn't pan out because the person who is filtering resumes has nothing to do with the job for which a developer applies. The HR people are the ones I'm concerned about, not the dev managers. What if they see that candidate X is "against Bush" or whatever and, out of personal spite, throw away his resume? Just a thought.
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|