|
Ya, I checked it too.
We are unable to edit or delete once we put comment.
Jinal Desai - LIVE
Experience is mother of sage....
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: I saw today that posting comments on questions and answers has been released for us
This new feature is very very cool.
CP team - nice work.
|
|
|
|
|
Allows you almost to chat with the OP, without creating noise in the answers (no-one was using the Question forum anyway...). Great feature
|
|
|
|
|
We're still fine tuning. We thought we'd get what we currently had out first, then add little extras like edit and delete
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yep! Thought so...
Changes looks great...
|
|
|
|
|
The reason there is so much in the way of "enhancement" suggestions in the forums... This[^] lady has joined us looking for love; obviously people will need all the help they can get to "look after" her.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like she already has been looked after by Chris... "This account has been disabled!"
|
|
|
|
|
The swine. He's keeping her to himself. It's not as though he hasn't got enough attractive young ladies around the CP office - it seems the talent pool in Canada is much higher, so they really do have gorgeous 26 year old PhD nuclear physicists just hanging around at CP central waiting to defuse the bomb.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Do ... do you really think I'm gorgeous?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Babe - I'm licking the screen right now, you love god, you.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
I also know how to diffuse bombs.
No big deal.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I also know how to diffuse bombs.
For your own safety I would suggest learning how to defuse them!
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
They are much better when viewed through a soft filter.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: They are much better when viewed through a soft filter.
A bit like those lingerie shots that Sean had taken of himself.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: A bit like those lingerie shots that Sean had taken of himself.
You mean you peeped?
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
User varungates[^] has posted two items under the Interviews category of Tips/Tricks. Both have no content except a link that my company's webblocker won't let me access. I am assuming good faith posts to the promised content, but I can't be sure. Thought I would bring it to your attention.
|
|
|
|
|
All is fine there.
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know. Is there any way I can withdraw my downvotes?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you can. On articles and messages, and probably also on Q&A and T&T, you can revote, the new vote then replaces the older one; but you can't "unvote".
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, deleting the "My vote of 1" comments seems to have done the trick.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I forgot to mention that: if you manage to delete the reply/answer that holds the vote, the vote is gone. However that fails if the reply has been replied to, or the answer has been edited by somebody else.
|
|
|
|
|
can this somehow be prevented?
Reason is that these really old questions get bumped up to the latest tab and this is pretty irksome. There is one question right now on the first page that was asked a full 4 months ago!
Or can a custom filter be added to sort by posted date alone?
|
|
|
|
|
This has been bothering me too. Perhaps implement a mechanism where questions get closed after, say, 30 days of inactivity? Closed items could not be edited or answered.
|
|
|
|
|
These generally doesn't happen. Probably these happened because of recent SPAM flood... It should be back to normal once the issue is totally resolved.
|
|
|
|
|
It DOES happen, I just found myself answering a question from jul 2009, because someone had found it necessary to add an answer to it. Realised halfway through the answer that this was a pointless exercise. We really need a sell-by-date on those questions. Closing down after 20 days of inactivity?
|
|
|
|