|
A special blend of 13 herbs and spices.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Finger-Lickin'-Good...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Dammit Marcus, you made me think of KFC ... *drool*
Gotta move that keyboard away from me and clean the mouse.
|
|
|
|
|
Manfred R. Bihy wrote: Gotta move that keyboard away from me and clean the mouse. Laugh
Why?
Are you a messy eater?
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
No, when Marcus said "Finger lickin' good" and I remembered that old KFC commercial.
This in turn made me drool.
Thus the need to move the keyboard and clean the mouse.
It's not so much fun if you have to explain it ....
BTW Henry are you taking your medicines
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I tried to submit my blog here: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/BlogFeed.aspx I get this error message. Error: Invalid viewstate Any ideas?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
What is the address of the blog you are trying to add?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like everything worked. I just tried adding it and it turns out you had already been successful.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
New (small yellow balloon) status shows for every message (inside My Messages), even if it is 6 months old and read 100 times.
Is it a bug or it works like that???
If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be.
Now put foundations under them.
modified on Thursday, January 6, 2011 5:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
How are they now?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
They are still comming
If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be.
Now put foundations under them.
|
|
|
|
|
In Q/A & Tip/Trick section, the Tag autocomplete is not working for me.
BTW My browser is Firefox 3.6.13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should be good now,
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Should be good now,
Now fine Chris.
Off Topic: Inactive Tip/Ticks
Today morning(Indian time 8 AM - GMT +05:30) I have posted 2 Tip/Tricks but It's status still in pending. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
They have to be moderated, so it can take a while, depending on how busy people are. I've noticed twelve hours or more at busy times.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Got it. Now I'll work other things which is in pipeline.
BTW Congrats dude(MVP)
|
|
|
|
|
This zennie[^] member does not post constructive criticism about my XML article[^] except for 1 post about the mistake in the code example. He attacked my C++ knowledge without a valid basis (I have been professionally programming in C++ since 2003). He also verbally attacked people who vote 5 for the article. He also vote down the comments which he does not like: if he does not like the comments, he can reply constructively to refute them, there is no need to vote down the comments. And he kept coming back to attack me which I cannot ignore!
Please do something about him.
|
|
|
|
|
This "zennie" is most likely a sock puppet account. They have hardly no rep points and they have been with CP for more than 2 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, as much as you dislike the 1 vote, at least he has posted his "justification" for the vote. Whether you agree with him or not, he is entitled to his opinion. I have had univoters who've given me grief, and I've had to take it when they are justified in their own mind. All you can do, sadly, is take it on the chin, as the user hasn't violated any of the site rules.
|
|
|
|
|
He actually did justify his vote - I happen to think a 1 was a pretty harsh given the overall complexity and presentation of the article.
As for blindly voting 5 on some articles, many folks here do it, but that's because they simply don't have time to test the code for their own edification. I don't generally vote an article unless it's presentation is very poor, or unless I actually use the code.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder where did I rub off him in the wrong way. Perhaps my article reminded him of that humorous guy who snatched away his last girlfriend?
|
|
|
|
|
I've already told you once - many times there is NO reason for doing it. At least he told you your code sucked, and why it sucked (in his eyes). My last 1-vote simply had the letter "m" attached, and despite asking for more info, the person never did respond.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
As was mentioned by others in this thread, he did actually put down a justification of his vote and that is his privilege on this site and I personally wouldn't want it any other way.
I posted to him, however, that he seems to have spent an inordinate amount of time slamming you on this article and that instead of that, if he is such an expert, he should write a better article himself.
Apparently, this twat figured that this was deserving of a univotr as well.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|