|
*hanging head in shame*
IE11
I'll swap back over to Chrome and see if it goes away
*picks up coat on way out*
|
|
|
|
|
|
I changed my email for my codeproject account. Somewhere in the process I was told I would receive an email as part of the process. I never received any email. I am now logged in via G+. I want to get back to my original codeproject account.
I have tried logging in with both the old and new email addresses. No luck either way.
|
|
|
|
|
I've sent you an email to help you out with this. We'll get it sorted.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the only place we have it currently is in as part of the actual submission wizard. They're pretty rare ...
"A Reference article is a short (typically 1 page) article used to lookup common information such as tables (eg. ASCII tables, HTTP codes etc) or function or class explanations. Typically there will be few if any images, and no downloadable code (though both are possible if the author wishes)"
I have changed the type on the article.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the fact that these discussions have been underwent here a lot of times before, but I really think that the solution is needed.
For example, when a question is closed due to any reporting reason, everything about that question is hidden as well, such as comments, solutions etc. Which is not an ideal case. Everything about that question is there, comments are there, solutions and comments to them are there as well. So why hide them only?
My simple proposal is, lock the thread for new solutions, but leave comments and solutions available. Lock the thread for further solutions, as long as the thread remains locked, but allow interactions in comments, or at least let the readers view comments etc so that they know why the post was locked.
Many posts are locked, yet they have some sense in them and a real world problem, only we cannot reproduce it here, so the post gets locked. I really think, this needs to be rectified as OP does not even get a chance to see any suggestion, any comment, and the thread gets locked away.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
The OP can still see the replies via the email that is sent though
|
|
|
|
|
In my eyes the problem isn't that questions get closed. It's that the wrong questions are closed (or aren't closed).
A question that has no value, or is spam, abusive, contains inappropriate content or simply has no redeeming values should be closed and it should not be available to anyone. It's noise.
If a question truly has value then it can be reopened.
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: yet they have some sense in them and a real world problem
This can certainly happen, but if the specific problem came up again for someone then it would be posted as a new, and hopefully more reasonably phrased question.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I've followed all the steps, category, tags, etc. and now I want to write the content of my article, but the HTML editor is disabled.
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser are you using?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chrome, Chris, but last night I found it behaving buggy, and had to restart. Doesn't often happen with Windows 10 I'll try again this morning.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be great if a moderator can specify a comment/reason as to why an article being reported as Unclear or Incomplete, Extremely poor quality,Off-topic, Spam/abusive, etc...
I also think the Spam/Abusive should be separated into two categories.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the Comments section at the bottom of the article - use the "Add a Comment or Question" button.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
The comment area doesn't appear for blogs right away. It has to be approved for publication first.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
True, I forgot that. Probably needs fixing.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Nope,
Having a conversion with a spammer is not my idea of forwarding the rights of programmers at cp. Do nothing. As best as you can.
|
|
|
|
|
For spam, plagiarism, and abuse, I agree - but when a blog comes in that is unclear, or very poor quality it could only help improve the document and the site if we can talk to the author and tell him what we feel it lacks. Otherwise, he just gets a rejection without any idea of the detail of why. That doesn't really help anyone, does it?
I don't think the idea suggested is that a comment should be compulsory - just that it should be possible.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
So you're suggesting that there should be a way of commenting without using any of the reasons to dismiss the dialog by clicking on the categorical nexus.
That's your best? Ok, I buy that.
|
|
|
|
|
What happened to the popup of avatar/minor user info when I hover over their name?
I don't even see the option for it.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK - it's there - and (still) checked - and nothing's happening.
I'll log off/log on and see if it comes back.
Could it be 'just me' ?
[edit] Nope - restart after deleting all cookies didn't help. I was so sure those pictures are actually what everyone looked like.[edit]
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: Could it be 'just me' ? Yes. It is working for me.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: Could it be 'just me' ? Possibly; it is working for me at the moment.
|
|
|
|