Click here to Skip to main content
15,867,330 members

Comments by Cindy Meister (Top 4 by date)

Cindy Meister 30-Jun-14 13:08pm View    
Reason for my vote of 3 \n Interesting, but difficult to follow because too much information is left out and there are some bad spelling errors. Although two articles are listed as reference the author should still at least mention WHERE the code he provides should go. Either the reader knows all this already and doesn't need the article, or the information is new and thus more framework should be provided.
Cindy Meister 5-Dec-13 13:39pm View    
Reason for my vote of 3 \n I think this is a useful article, but can't be sure due to the poor proof-reading. It's unclear whether we're dealing with a UDID or UUID - both are used multiple times. Also the file name extensions are unclear as various things are used. Careful proof-reading and correctness could make this a good article, rather than one of questionable usefulness.
Cindy Meister 10-Aug-13 12:11pm View    
Reason for my vote of 2 \n If you had a least provided a link to the original code you're now getting "points" for...
Cindy Meister 22-Feb-13 13:17pm View    
Reason for my vote of 4 \n It would be nice to have more information in the Note as it is not clear what is meant and why there might be problems?