15,867,330 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by Cindy Meister (Top 4 by date)
Cindy Meister
30-Jun-14 13:08pm
View
Reason for my vote of 3 \n Interesting, but difficult to follow because too much information is left out and there are some bad spelling errors. Although two articles are listed as reference the author should still at least mention WHERE the code he provides should go. Either the reader knows all this already and doesn't need the article, or the information is new and thus more framework should be provided.
Cindy Meister
5-Dec-13 13:39pm
View
Reason for my vote of 3 \n I think this is a useful article, but can't be sure due to the poor proof-reading. It's unclear whether we're dealing with a UDID or UUID - both are used multiple times. Also the file name extensions are unclear as various things are used. Careful proof-reading and correctness could make this a good article, rather than one of questionable usefulness.
Cindy Meister
10-Aug-13 12:11pm
View
Reason for my vote of 2 \n If you had a least provided a link to the original code you're now getting "points" for...
Cindy Meister
22-Feb-13 13:17pm
View
Reason for my vote of 4 \n It would be nice to have more information in the Note as it is not clear what is meant and why there might be problems?