Comments by MrKBA - CodeProject

MrKBA 22-Apr-13 4:51am View

yes.thank you

MrKBA 22-Apr-13 4:51am View

Deleted

yes.thank you

MrKBA 18-Apr-13 5:04am View

So conclusion, it is impossible to ensure this ?
And caller should have at least the new version of COM to works ?

MrKBA 17-Apr-13 12:31pm View

sorry for that
Normally the backward compatibility was planed to ensure that if one soft is compiled for an old version of the library, it can continue to work with the new higher version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 1)

is the reverse also true?

means if the soft is compiled with the new higher version of dll it can continue to work with the old version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 2)

My situation is the first one, So I ask if should I have also situation 2 works ?

MrKBA 17-Apr-13 12:27pm View

sorry for that
Normally the backward compatibility was planed to ensure that if one soft is compiled for an old version of the library, it can continue to work with the new higher version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 1)
is the reverse also true?
means if the soft is compiled with the new higher version of dll it can continue to work with the old version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 2)
my situation is the first one, So I ask if should I have also situation 2 works ?

Comments by MrKBA (Top 5 by date)