15,742,400 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View Javascript questions
View C++ questions
View Python questions
View Java questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by sucram (Top 10 by date)
sucram
7-Dec-11 10:50am
View
Check out my update. If that is not what you are looking for you need to explain your question a bit better orgive us the select statement you want build.
sucram
7-Dec-11 8:58am
View
Ditto. Second chat question in a couple of hours.
sucram
5-Dec-11 10:51am
View
42
sucram
2-Dec-11 5:34am
View
Update the code. You really could have figured that part out yourself
sucram
2-Dec-11 1:34am
View
Deleted
If a query does not return a result it will return a table with no rows. So binding to table[0] should not be an issue, unless the dataset is populated programmatically somehow and the table is not created..
sucram
9-Jun-11 6:04am
View
Sorry for the late feedback.
The link you provided me with answered my questions. Thanks a mill.
sucram
3-Jun-11 8:39am
View
Thanks Wayne, I will deffinetly read through this series of articles, I was reading Sacha's series of articles called Beginner's Guide to Threading just to familiarize myself again with some of the pitfalls wrt threading.
sucram
24-May-11 9:18am
View
Thanks, figured it out eventually I forgot to add an errormessage to the validator and my regular expression was not exactly what I wanted it to be.
The user input failed validation without notifying me, hence the postback did not fire. I also only noticed that the regular expression was not what I wanted it to be after I added the error message to the validator.
sucram
17-Jan-11 4:45am
View
Deleted
Reason for my vote of 5
Completly forgot about this operator. Thanks for reminding me I will definetly uses so as not to forget it again.
sucram
29-Dec-10 2:24am
View
Hi Ben,
When using the Foreach loop with an array it has nor performance hit what so ever. Many abide to this vicious rumor.
If you however use the foreach loop with lists then you will suffer a blow to performance. This blow is not significant if you do not work with list often. If you do however need to access lists often then the foreach loop should be replaced with a for loop.
Show More