|
Complete the sentence please.
Gary Wheeler wrote: Hi Gary!
"and I use Visual SourceSafe. Writing VB6 code on XP machine & use browser control to simulate IE6"
FTFY 
|
|
|
|
|
I've never written any Visual Basic, much less VB6.
Until recently, I did develop on an XP box; our legacy products still run on it, so developing on it made sense.thatraja wrote: use browser control to simulate IE6
Is this somehow supposed to be related to my article Using the WebBrowser control, simplified[^]? I'll admit the article is a little dated, but I did polish it up a couple years ago. It's seemed fairly popular, and not too many folks have down-voted it.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no. I just mentioned couple of outdated things there(VB6, XP, IE6.,). Too bad CM & co removed joke icon here so my joke message is 
Gary Wheeler wrote: It's seemed fairly popular, and not too many folks have down-voted it.
Please check mine there.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the 5!
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have the other half of this medallion?  And I have even used your web browser control in a project. I used it for making a generic dialog as I got sick of creating common dialog resources just for presenting some data. With your little class I can tag on some styling and HTML formatting - works great.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I'm glad you like it. I've used it a lot for displaying HTML I've generated for reports and such.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that is kind of what I do to.
As a side project, I used it with styling to create a MessageBox() lookalike dialog. It was really just to see if I could do it, but it actually makes it possible to stick all kinds of things in a MessageBox (tables, images, you name it).
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I think there's something to be said for it. I've probably used that more than anything else over the years, but not for 10 years at least now.
In those days, when someone had a file checked out a verbal 'after you' seemed to work ok. Now we have branches everywhere and horrendous merging, one of the most painful parts of my job.
Whilst I accept that this is the way things work these days and I wouldn't go back it did seem to work just fine in the old days.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Our group is small. When we first started out, we decided the exclusive checkout model was easier for us to deal with. It's become part of our 'culture' now. We do use branching, but it tends to be a 'whole product' kind of thing. When a version is released to manufacturing, we create a branch for maintenance purposes. It becomes a separate development path for the software. Usually there are only a few updates in the branch, but we've occasionally had active branches that were maintained for years (stern looks  at certain customers who refuse to update to later versions).
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Good Lord.
Guys, can we have a whip round?
|
|
|
|
|
The key here is to learn to love the whip.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I used Git, CVS and Mercurial (Hg) before.
and I like Mercurial (Hg) more.
Mercurial (Hg) is more easy to handle.
|
|
|
|
|
Not really programming in high level last time, but when... I use to do backups each day with timestamp in name and a tiny explanation on what was going on that day. If I need more explanation then I add a tiny *.txt with what I need to save.
If I come back to high level end, I suppose I will have a look to those tools and pick one.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
you should use some scc to aquire the knowledge. I would recommand git
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Why are there CVS and Mercurial in the list and Perforce is missing?
|
|
|
|
|
because perforce sucks.
and yes, i'm using it daily at my job - and hate every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
In comparison to ClearCase, it's a thing of mesmerizing beauty.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Because cr@p cannot be VCS. Everybody who touched it, LEAVED it.
|
|
|
|
|
I use SVN but sometimes I thought...My source files are under control but my code is Out of Control 
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVN is a document versioning system; it does not have the functionality required for code management.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It does work pretty well, Ankh is also good!
Er, I can't think of a funny signature right now.
How about a good fart to break the silence?
|
|
|
|
|
My "Other" SCC system is Perforce. I'd rather use Git, but the PHB's at work have decreed that Perforce is our repository.
|
|
|
|
|
My project uses AccuRev which is a cousin of ClearCase. It allows a pretty good amount of flexibility.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
