|
JM76 wrote: The problem is the browser, Internet explorer can't find the web page.
If your browser cannot open Google, is that the browsers fault? I'd first check connectivity, in particular NAT.
Download a portable Apache-server and put it on USB. Start that on the machine that you are trying to reach. That way you can verify whether the computer can be found and the TCP settings/firwall/router is correct. I'm going to guess that the translation of the external IP to an internal IP is incorrect.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
GuyThiebaut
That's still not telling me the error message you receive.
Are you getting a 404, what is the exact wording of the error message?
Eddy Vluggen
If your browser cannot open Google, is that the browsers fault? I'd first check connectivity, in particular NAT.
Download a portable Apache-server and put it on USB. Start that on the machine that you are trying to reach. That way you can verify whether the computer can be found and the TCP settings/firwall/router is correct. I'm going to guess that the translation of the external IP to an internal IP is incorrect.
Hi Mr.GuyThiebaut and Mr.Eddy Vluggen
Thank you very much for your reply and sorry for my delay. Right now I´m out until the next monday. I can´t prove anything more. As soon as I come back I´m going to prove it and then I´ll reply
|
|
|
|
|
That's still not telling me the error message you receive.
Are you getting a 404, what is the exact wording of the error message?
If your browser cannot open Google, is that the browsers fault? I'd first check connectivity, in particular NAT.
Download a portable Apache-server and put it on USB. Start that on the machine that you are trying to reach. That way you can verify whether the computer can be found and the TCP settings/firwall/router is correct. I'm going to guess that the translation of the external IP to an internal IP is incorrect.
Hi Christopher & Eddy
Please take a look to the following image, if you can, please try yourself.
From the client I do not get any error message
If you try to do a telnet, you can see this work perfectly, so this means that port forwarding is right.
http://i57.tinypic.com/ms2glu.png[^]
|
|
|
|
|
JM76 wrote: Please take a look to the following image
If that is a screenshot from your local network, using the outside adress, then yes, I'd expect it to not find it.
From any other computer outside the network, it should be visible. It ain't from my place - something accepts the connection, but that's about it.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Eddy, thank you very much!!!
No, the screenshot is from outside of my network, I´m connected with another public IP.
When I try connect from my network, inside the Lan, everything is fine.
I don´t know what else I can try.
|
|
|
|
|
I would have expected the other way around 
I can't TeamView, but if I did, the first thing I'd be doing is downloading a webserver. As soon as the external IP in a browser shows the "it works" page from Apache, I'd replace the server with another app (SSRS in your case).
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I have tried the following, Install IIS and try to access from outside, and works perfectly.
Download a portable Apache-server and put it on USB. Start that on the machine that you are trying to reach. That way you can verify whether the computer can be found and the TCP settings/firwall/router is correct. I'm going to guess that the translation of the external IP to an internal IP is incorrect.
Sorry Eddy, but I don´t understand what have to do.
I have download xampp portable http://portableapps.com/apps/development/xampp[], but I´m a litle lost, If you can guide me ...
|
|
|
|
|
JM76 wrote: I don´t understand what have to do.
You already done it; whether it's tested with IIS or Apache makes little difference. If you can connect from the outside and see the IIS-page, then the network-settings are correct.
To summarize; you have an application that servers webpages (IIS) and that is reachable from outside of the local network. You have another application (SSRS) that works correctly on the network, but does not talk to the outside world.
Does SSRS require credentials? I had expected an error-message if it is missing a authentication, but I can imagine that there's some kind of "lock" on SSRS to prevent anonymous browsing of the database.
Apparently it is complicated enough to write a book[^] on the subject.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Eddy
Finally SOLVED!!! After reading your linkhttp://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/feature/SQL-Server-2008-Reporting-Services-for-Internet-deployment[^]
All I have done, is edit the file rsreportserver.config and change the tag Authentication
<Authentication>
<AuthenticationTypes>
<RSWindowsBasic/>
<RSWindowsKerberos/>
</AuthenticationTypes>
<RSWindowsExtendedProtectionLevel>Off</RSWindowsExtendedProtectionLevel>
<RSWindowsExtendedProtectionScenario>Proxy</RSWindowsExtendedProtectionScenario>
<EnableAuthPersistence>true</EnableAuthPersistence>
</Authentication>
After this works perfectly.
Thank you very much
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome, and thanks for posting the solution
Might save someone else some days of frustration.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Guys
I am facing one issue on ssis.
I have to fatch 100 record with pending status from DB and send to web service. on response of web service would get same 100 record and same need to update with completed status in DB. Now again I have to fatch 100 record with pending status..... so I have to execute ssis package till record with completed status.
plz let me know how I can execute ssis package till all record update.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Now you've cross-posted.
Only after you told him not to post it in the C# forum. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The C# forum may well be the correct forum. He hasn't answered my question there.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Does anybody have any idea about the system/Link, Where Microsoft provides an Environment and we can do experiments , Work with database, run our query etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all, I am trying to design a database to hold data for a job portal. Basically I have a database called SiteUsers which contains five tables (UsersTable, JobSeekersTable, ResumesTable, EmployersTable, and JobsTable). The following are the table schema for UsersTable, ResumesTable, and JobsTable.
The UsersTable has a Primary Key (PK) of UserID and a Foreign Key (FK) of Username.
The ResumesTable has a PK of ResumeID and the JobsTable has a PK of JobID.
The JobSeekersTable has a PK of Username.
The EmployersTable has a PK of Username.
The question I have is should the JobSeekersTable FK also be Username, or ResumeID, or a composite of Username and ResumeID. I think that the FK should be Username because it's unique but because it's not the primary key of the JobsTable I am uncertain. Also I did not want to use ResumeID as the FK in the JobSeekersTable because although it will be unique a job seeker can have more than one resume.
Whether you agree or disagree with my assumption that Username should be the PK and FK in the JobSeekersTable, please elaborate your answer . Thanks in advance for your help.
modified 30-Oct-14 12:35pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0) You don't actually define a foreign key on a table
1) You may want to define a unique index on UsersTable, but don't use it as a foreign key
2) The other tables should be related to UsersTable on UserID, not on Username
|
|
|
|
|
A foreign key is a primary key from another table. The "username" in the Users table (calling it userstable is redundant, all those things are tables and not chairs with little chance of confusing those) is not a foreign key - but it might be candidate-primary key.
Also, the artificial autonumber may be unique, but it does not mean that one can assign it blindly to be the primary key without asking oneself what the user will be using to uniquely identify a record.
You should look into normalization.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, thanks for responding. You said "calling it userstable is redundant", that was a typo.
|
|
|
|
|
What r the works u r doing in the IT company..I want to become plsql developer..please share ur works in brief..
|
|
|
|
|
The first thing you should do is learn to use a keyboard!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I foresee a return to single letter variables. Bring back the ZX80!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Suppose I have a database table named JobsTable and among the fields in the table are JobDescriptions, and JobTitle. How would I write my Where clause if users can get all the JobTitle where the JobDescriptions field contains any word in the comma separated list they entered?
I tried the Like keyword but it is not doing what I want. Thanks in advance for your help.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
