|
Mark_Wallace wrote: And it seems likely that what is said today as reportage will tomorrow be thought of as comedy.
Or as a big 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Elvis never died, he just returned to the stars
He didn't even have to return to them - he always was there, with them.
|
|
|
|
|
Note that another team that noticed this insisted that it was a sign of an advanced civilisation on an exoplanet they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It’s time to get jazzed about the future of the .NET ecosystem! A chance to rewrite all your .NET Framework apps?
|
|
|
|
|
I have today been looking for a bit of information regarding this, because our App is facing a new major version (total re-do).
What a headache...
.Net Framework is a bit risky for the future, we are already re-doing the basics, don't want to do a big port in a couple of years.
.Net 5 is not released yet and as always the first versions are going to be a bit "dangerous"
.Net Core 3.0 or 3.1 is a start, they are already out there long enough to have grown a bit stability and madurity. But... If you don't trust the "start doing it in .Net Core, porting it to .Net 5 will be trivial"
Good that I am not the one having to decide (although I have to debate it too)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: start doing it in .Net Core, porting it to .Net 5 will be trivial
WHY do you have to port YET AGAIN? It's all crap.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
That's exactly my thought and my problem.
I don't trust it will be that trivial. They have already messed it up several times, so why should this time be different?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: .Net 5 is not released yet and as always the first versions are going to be a bit "dangerous"
.Net Core 3.0 or 3.1 is a start, they are already out there long enough to have grown a bit stability and madurity. But... If you don't trust the "start doing it in .Net Core, porting it to .Net 5 will be trivial"
There's a document somewhere that the Longterm Servicing (LTS) Version of .NET 5 will be .NET 6 next year. So if you decide to upgrade it's probably best to skip 5 and target 6, at which point it will be much more solid and, being LTS, you can relax for the next decade.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know, thanks.
Pity that we'll need / have to start our re-do in near future.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you can. Lots of deprecated functionality...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It goes up to Five!
That's one higher than all the other .NETs!
Most blokes will be coding at four!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: That's one higher than all the other .NETs!
That actually is their intention behind this versioning.
They jumped the .Net Core 4.xx to avoid confusion with current .Net Frameworks
And the .Net 5.xx should symbolize, this is the new version as the future of both Framework and Core.
On the one hand, seems logical.
On the other hand... if they wouldn't come with one shiny new product so fast, the confusion with versions and compatibilities would be way smaller.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
On the fifth anniversary of Windows 10, we look back at what it was supposed to be and what it ultimately became. Almost nothing turned out as planned, and that’s OK. The last version of Windows...until the next one
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: The last version of Windows...until the next one
Hey... don't be so... it still is Windows 10, no version changed 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a triumph for the nascent industry of "satellite servicing," an aging communications satellite has returned to service in geostationary orbit. "Oh rise and show your power"
|
|
|
|
|
OK, ladder? Check.
Sponge? Check.
Bucket of water and vinegar? Check.
Which way's the Hubble?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Avatarify runs on Skype and Zoom, and face-swaps your own face with a celebrity in live video calls. You mean that wasn't Elon Musk on my last call?
|
|
|
|
|
|
As if there were not enough problems with those apps to hijack them with such "interesting and usefull" plugins
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My concern is, if it fails it may reveal that I am actually a potato...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
modified 20-Apr-20 10:34am.
|
|
|
|
|
Version 3.0.0 of Microsoft’s implementation of the C++ Core Guidelines Support Library (GSL) is now available for you to download It's like a standard, but Microsoft scented
|
|
|
|
|
Israeli researchers use vibrations from CPU, GPU, or PC chassis fans to broadcast stolen information through solid materials and to nearby receives, breaking air-gapped system protections. "I'm pickin' up good vibrations"
I'm finding myself less worried, and more irritated when an "academic" creates a "hack" where the first step is, "after installing a kernel-level driver..."
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Israeli researchers use vibrations from CPU, GPU, or PC chassis fans to broadcast stolen information through solid materials and to nearby receives, breaking air-gapped system protections.
I get like this when the first step is having access to the physical device.
|
|
|
|
|
Wastedtalent wrote: I get like this when the first step is having access to the physical device.
... and the next step is to use a smartphone to record the fan noise. There's a reason why, going back decades, the DoD has banned moving most electronics in/out of secure areas (with strictness going up with security levels); and the design of secure rooms includes features to preclude acoustic/electromagnetic noise from being able to escape.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
