|
I have following line of code:
if(a==Z||<br />
b==Z||<br />
c==Z||<br />
d==Z||<br />
e==Z||<br />
f==Z||<br />
g==Z)<br />
{<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
}can this be written in a better way ?
p.s all the variables are of type enums
|
|
|
|
|
How about:
if (a <= Z && Z <= g)
... Of course, trying to one-up the optimizer is usually a lost cause.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Is Z a enumeration value or a variable? If they are all variables, you really can't do much without making assumptions about ordering for the values.
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
Can Somebody help me..
i have one ListBox and one combobox . i want that when user select any item in the ListBox , the path of that item is got selected in the combobox..
How to achieve this..
Please help me in this..
Thanks and Regards
|
|
|
|
|
step1:
In the ui designer, right click the control (combobox) and
click 'wizard'.
You can add an event to it.
Then, an event function will be created in the classes you chose.
step2:
Add code in the event function.
Something like this->GetDlgText(...)
|
|
|
|
|
You need to insert this item to ComboBox withAddStringand use of
<br />
SetCurlSel
|
|
|
|
|
Shikha Jain wrote: How to achieve this..
Are you handling the LBN_SELCHANGE notification?
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
this is an continuous message...
Below is the client code to receive 2 replies from a server:
/*********/
BOOL streamclient(char* ip, unsigned short port, char* message, AString* astr_reply)
{
//
// Create a TCP/IP stream socket
//
SOCKET theSocket;
theSocket=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,IPPROTO_TCP);
if(theSocket==INVALID_SOCKET)
{
eprintf("ServerHandler:streamclient()\nsocket() %s %u", ip, port);
return FALSE;
}
//
// Fill in the address structure
//
SOCKADDR_IN saServer;
DWORD dwIPAddr=inet_addr(ip);
saServer.sin_family=AF_INET;
saServer.sin_addr.s_addr=*((u_long FAR*)((char*)&dwIPAddr));
saServer.sin_port=htons(port);
//
// connect to the server
//
int nRet;
nRet=connect(theSocket, // Socket
(LPSOCKADDR)&saServer, // Server address
sizeof(struct sockaddr));// Length of server address structure
if(nRet==SOCKET_ERROR)
{
closesocket(theSocket);
eprintf("ServerHandler:streamclient()\nconnect() %s %u", ip, port);
return FALSE;
}
//
// Send data to the server
//
nRet=send(theSocket, // Connected socket
message, // Data buffer
(int)strlen(message), // Length of data
0); // Flags
if(nRet==SOCKET_ERROR)
{
closesocket(theSocket);
eprintf("ServerHandler:streamclient()\nsend() %s %u", ip, port);
return FALSE;
}
aprintf("sent to CATOS (%s %u):\n%s", ip, port, message);
//
// Wait for a reply
//
char* szBuf;
AString astr;
/* receive ACK */
szBuf=(char*)malloc(sizeof(char)*(CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE+1));
if(szBuf==NULL)
{
eprintf("ServerHandler:streamclient()\nszBuf==NULL");
return FALSE;
}
nRet=recv(theSocket, // Connected socket
szBuf, // Receive buffer
CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE,//sizeof(szBuf), // Size of receive buffer
0); // Flags
if(nRet==SOCKET_ERROR)
{
closesocket(theSocket);
free(szBuf);
eprintf("ServerHandler:streamclient()\nrecv() %s %u", ip, port);
return FALSE;
}
if(astr.Set(szBuf))
aprintf("received from server:\n%s", astr.SubString(0, ETX, TRUE));
else
aprintf("received from server:\n[ACK]");
/* receive useful reply */
// clear szBuf and wait for a while so that recv() becomes ready:
for(int i=0; i<catos_buffer_size; i++)
="" szbuf[i]="\0" ;
="" sleep(second_receive_delay);
="" nret="recv(theSocket," connected="" socket
="" szbuf,="" receive="" buffer
="" catos_buffer_size,="" sizeof(szbuf),="" size="" of="" 0);="" flags
="" if(nret="=SOCKET_ERROR)
" {
="" closesocket(thesocket);
="" free(szbuf);
="" eprintf("serverhandler:streamclient()\nrecv()="" %s="" %u",="" ip,="" port);
="" aprintf("serverhandler:streamclient()\nrecv()="" port);return="" false;
="" }
="" if(astr_reply-="">Set(szBuf, nRet))
{
//
// Display the received data
//
free(szBuf);
closesocket(theSocket);
aprintf("received from server:\n%s", astr_reply->Value);
/* exception */
return TRUE;
}
aprintf("received from server:\n[useful reply]");
free(szBuf);
closesocket(theSocket);
return FALSE;
}
BOOL ServerHandler::Send(char* ip, unsigned short port, char* message)
{
WORD wVersionRequested;
WSADATA wsaData;
int nRet;
int i;
wVersionRequested=MAKEWORD(1,1);
nRet=WSAStartup(wVersionRequested, &wsaData);
if(wsaData.wVersion==wVersionRequested)
{
for(i=0; i
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
is it showing exception which executing aprintf statement or after returning from aprintf statement
mpk1979
|
|
|
|
|
If a printf("aprintf OK"); is added after calling aprintf,
the message "aprintf OK" can be shown.
then goes to return TRUE;
But printf("returned") if added in the lower function, it does not show "returned".
So, I think something causes the exception for exiting the upper function.
Please advise.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what the server is sending you, but you send this many bytes
(int)strlen(message),
to the server (you're not sending the NULL terminator at the end of the message).
On the first receive from the server you assume the string is NULL terminated
if(astr.Set(szBuf))
Try either sending "strlen(message) + 1" bytes or using "if(astr.Set(szBuf,nRet))" instead of
"if(astr.Set(szBuf))".
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Mark!
I tried to send "strlen(message) + 1" bytes to the server.
The exception appears less often, but still occurs.
The exception message is:
"DAMAGE: after Normal block (#1409) at 0x0032EF20"
I cannot use 'try' to catch it. Using debug mode fails to locate the error line...
Please help me again.
It should be very close to the solution.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Archyami wrote: I tried to send "strlen(message) + 1" bytes to the server.
The exception appears less often, but still occurs
That's fine. You need to do the same on your sends FROM the server as well otherwise this line
is going to be problematic on the client side:
if(astr.Set(szBuf))
You are still assuming that szBuf has a NULL terminator. Whether or not this is causing the
exception I don't know.
A few notes and questions...
You allocate a receive buffer CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE+1 bytes in length but only recv CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE
bytes into it. Why?
I believe you mentioned using blocking sockets in another post. If so, the Sleep() call is
useless since the second recv call will block until you receive some more bytes or the
socket closes or error occurs. It looks like you're waiting until "for sure" all the bytes have
arrived before trying the second receive. This may work for a few "packets" but is very
inefficient for a tcp socket. Instead, it works better to keep calling recv until you get the
bytes you are expecting (remember, recv() won't always give them all to you in one call). To
receive CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE bytes try something like:
szBuf=(char*)malloc(sizeof(char)*(CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE+1));
int TotalBytesReceived = 0;
while (TotalBytesReceived < CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE)
{
int CurBytesReceived = ::recv(theSocket, &szBuf[TotalBytesReceived], CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE - TotalBytesReceived, 0);
if (CurBytesReceived == 0)
{
break;
}
else if (CurBytesReceived == SOCKET_ERROR)
{
int rc = WSAGetLastError();
if (rc != WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
{
break;
}
}
else
{
TotalBytesReceived += CurBytesReceived;
}
}
if (TotalBytesReceived == CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE)
{
}
else
{
}
Make sure you send EXACTLY CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE from the server...if you don't you'll be stuck in
the loop waiting  If you can't always send the right amount you could timeout or something.
Mark
EDIT: By the way, you shouldn't ever get a WSAEWOULDBLOCK error on a blocking socket.
I added the check for WSAEWOULDBLOCK as an example of using a non-blocking socket.
More EDITS: Bad grammer, spelling, attitude, etc.
-- modified at 22:32 Thursday 19th October, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
I modified the server "send" with data length +1.
The exception does not occur.
Thanks very much, Mark!
I have a few questions:
1. The message eg. equals "abc". Its length is 3.
Why should I send its length as 4?
(The server is checked to send data within the length of CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE.)
2. The recv buffer is allocated with 1 more byte for safe (may be it is a risk...)
My design is that if CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE==10 and message comes from the server as "1234567890", it can hold the message. Indeed, a terminator is at the end (here is '0'). If '\0' is padded by the server, it can still hold the message.
'\0' is padded automatically for initializing an char array.
Please advise if my analysis is wrong.
3. If the server is checked to send data within the length of CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE, is it possible that the client recv() may receive the message sereral times instead of once?
I mean: recv() holds the application (thread). 'several times' refers to 1 recv() receives a part of the message, several recv() receives all message 'packages'.
Please advise.
|
|
|
|
|
Archyami wrote: 1. The message eg. equals "abc". Its length is 3.
Why should I send its length as 4?
(The server is checked to send data within the length of CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE.)
I don't think you SHOULD send 4. I was just trying to fix your exception before. If you
have 3 bytes to send then send 3 bytes
Archyami wrote: 2. The recv buffer is allocated with 1 more byte for safe (may be it is a risk...)
My design is that if CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE==10 and message comes from the server as "1234567890", it can hold the message. Indeed, a terminator is at the end (here is '0'). If '\0' is padded by the server, it can still hold the message.
'\0' is padded automatically for initializing an char array.
Please advise if my analysis is wrong.
If you want to send the '\0' WITH the string of characters "1234567890" then you need to
send 11 bytes. It is up to YOU to send and receive the correct amount of bytes.
Archyami wrote: 3. If the server is checked to send data within the length of CATOS_BUFFER_SIZE, is it possible that the client recv() may receive the message sereral times instead of once?
I mean: recv() holds the application (thread). 'several times' refers to 1 recv() receives a part of the message, several recv() receives all message 'packages'.
I'll try to explain this again...TCP knows NOTHING about "packages" or "packets" - it only
knows a STREAM of bytes. You can send 1000 bytes and on the other end you may receive
all 1000 bytes in one call to recv(), you may receive 10 bytes in one call to recv() and
990 bytes in the next call to recv(), etc.. It's all about BYTES and it's up to you keep
calling recv() until you get the number of bytes you are expecting.
If you always want to recv the same number of bytes you send then you need to use a
message/datagram based protocol like UDP.
I suggest reading this Windows Sockets 2[^].
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
How to add a work sheet in excel without using ODBC drivers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
when i am trying to add new ATL object but after clicking that option it will give error
"Error Invoking ATL Object Wizard Component"
And when i have tried this to other machine then also i got error like
"sorry !an error occurred while generating the object
Can anybody help me here why this error are coming how to solve it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does this help?
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Dear all
how to add a class which don't attach .cpp and .h files?i can't understand their project.thank u. urgent!!!!!!!
Li Zhiyuan
18/10/2006
|
|
|
|
|
Usually a class is declared in .h file and defined in a .cpp file, but it is possible to do this in a single file, if thats what you mean. The only other way I know of to add a class (without using source files) is to add a dll to the project. But even here it is difficult to export a class without the relevent header file.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you be more specific a class without cpp & h
|
|
|
|
|
li zhiyuan wrote: how to add a class which don't attach .cpp and .h files?
You can't. A class has to be in one or the other, but usually split between the two.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
To preserve thread integrity, you might want to respond to Li instead.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
