|
Hi again guys
i have a stupit question
lets say i have an array of char
char string[50];
i put some characters in it and then i want to erase the content of the array so i can put some other characters in it
so anyone knows how i erase all the values from the array?
thanks a lot
|
|
|
|
|
If you put characters into array using strcpy function, the old characters will be overwritten by new string; therefore there is no need to erase the old content.
If you want to erase the old content in order to wipe some important information, for instance the password, you can use memset(string, 0, sizeof(string)).
|
|
|
|
|
If what you want to have is just a null terminated C string. There's simply no need to erase the values of the array. The trailing 0 will be the thing signalling the end of the string. You must be dead sure that your string will never be more than 49 chars long. If not just use one of the string classes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks toxcct
but if i overwrite and the new sequence of characters is smaller than the one before some values will still be in the array
for example if the the first time i insert 30 characters and the second time only 10
i ll have a problem yes?
thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
no, because C-Style strings are NULL terminated ; that means that the last character in the string is the character '\0', so that when this character is encountered, the reader knows he reached the end of the string (whatever bytes remaining in the trailing space of the buffer)...
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[VisualCalc 3.0 updated ][Flags Beginner's Guide new! ]
|
|
|
|
|
antonaras wrote: i ll have a problem yes?
Only if the presence of characters 10-29 are an issue. If you are dealing with nul-terminated strings, the string-related functions (e.g., strcpy(), strlen()) will terminate at the first \0 character. Otherwise, no issue.
"The largest fire starts but with the smallest spark." - David Crow
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
<br />
const unsigned int MAX_S_SIZE = 50;<br />
char s[MAX_S_SIZE] = {0};<br />
<br />
strcpy(s, "Hello, world!");<br />
<br />
memset(s, 0, MAX_S_SIZE);<br />
<br />
const unsigned int MAX_S_SIZE = 50;<br />
TCHAR s[MAX_S_SIZE] = {0};<br />
_tscpy(s, _T("Hello, World!"));<br />
memset(s, 0, MAX_S_SIZE * sizeof(TCHAR));<br />
As a side note: you don't need to clear a buffer to overwrite it. It is more efficient to just overwrite it with the new data if your requirements allow for it.
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
you said::As a side note: you don't need to clear a buffer to overwrite it. It is more efficient to just overwrite it with the new data if your requirements allow for it.
but if i overwrite and the new sequence of characters is smaller than the one before some values will still be in the array
for example if the the first time i insert 30 characters and the second time only 10
i ll have a problem yes?
Thanks for the help Zac Howland
|
|
|
|
|
If you are reading in character buffers as a whole, yes, you will have a problem. If you are using them as C-style strings, then no, you won't. The reasoning is that C-style strings have a null-terminator.
Example:
const unsigned int ARRAY_SIZE = 20;<br />
char myBuffer[ARRAY_SIZE] = {0};<br />
<br />
strcpy(myBuffer, "My funny String");<br />
<br />
cout << myBuffer << endl;<br />
cout << strlen(myBuffer) << endl;<br />
<br />
strcpy(myBuffer, "Hello");<br />
<br />
cout << myBuffer << endl;<br />
cout << strlen(myBuffer) << endl;<br />
The only time you would run into problems doing this is when you will be looking at the entire character buffer (so all 20 characters) for information. However, in that case, you most likely will not be treating the buffer as a string, and will not be using the strXXX family of functions on it either (or their _tsc equivalents).
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
The standard string-handling functions like strcpy(...), strcat(...), sprintf(...), etc. will write a terminating NUL (not a NULL[^]) into the buffer you are using.
So if you use them, you normally do not have to worry about previous data causing issues (unless you are concerned about security, but that is another issue). Here is an example:
char caBuffer[ 50 ];
strcpy( caBuffer, "A Looooooooong String" );
strcpy( caBuffer, "A Short String" );
puts( caBuffer ); After the first call to strcpy(..) the buffer will contain (NUL is represented by Ø):
0123456789012345678901</CODE>
<CODE>----------------------</CODE>
A Looooooooong String<CODE>Ø -and after the second call to strcpy(...), the buffer will likely contain:
0123456789012345678901</CODE>
<CODE>----------------------</CODE>
A Short String<CODE>Ø</CODE>String<CODE>Ø When the string is shown using puts(...), it will display A Short String, even though the actual memory for the buffer has the extra data in it. Since string-handling functions use NUL as an end-of-string indicator, puts(...) stops when it gets to the first NUL it encounters.
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Twine wrote: write a terminating NUL (not a NULL[^])
You really got a obsession there, right?
"We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising: and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress, while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation."
-- Caius Petronius, Roman Consul, 66 A.D.
|
|
|
|
|
jhwurmbach wrote: You really got a obsession there, right? 
Yup! It is what separates the wheat from the chaff...
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
Why is Zac's answer low-voted? It was an accurate answer, wasn't it? 
Regards,
Nish
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Why is Zac's answer low-voted? It was an accurate answer, wasn't it?
Yes, it is accurate. Some people get hung up on the terminology (actually, just the spelling) of NUL vs NULL. In my opinion, as long as you know that you are talking about putting a 0 somewhere, it doesn't matter whether you call it a "nul-terminator" or a "null-terminator".
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I did not vote you down. Since you have no idea that I did or not, I have to guess that the mentioning my NUL vs. NULL point is but a coincidence - otherwise it would be a highly inappropriate assumption on your part. Also, you will note that even if I did vote you down, there are 4 other votes there as well. Did it ever occur to you that perhaps others know something that you do not? (And that just because you do not know what someone else is talking about, that does not mean that they do not?)
For the record, I voted your two earlier posts a 4. The fact that the first is now below that value may be indicative of something else.
NUL is one thing, NULL (in uppercase) is another. They are not two ways to spell the same thing, even though they have the same value. NUL is the name/mnemonic for an ASCII encoded character with a value of zero. BS, ACK, and NAK are similar characters. I am sure you (should?) know the history of NULL, even in C.
Consider this - my calling "C++" something else, like "G--; that C-ish language with the objects, and references, and virtual thingys" is not correct, even if I know that I am really talking about.
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - lots of people also do not come to a complete stop at a stop sign, and still manage to get someplace in one piece. And you should know by now that you should never use or site Microsoft as a model for anything software-related! :P :P :P
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't referring to you personally. I actually hadn't even read your response yet when I posted that.
On similar topics in the past (not necessarily on this forum, but others), I've been flamed for the nul vs null argument. My point is that as long as the reader understands what you are saying, it doesn't matter how you spell it.
And yes, I'm well aware of the history of ASCII characters ... use to have to use them all the time in my last job (ACK/NAK especially).
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
Personally i found the answer of Zac very accurate and helpful
|
|
|
|
|
It was mostly accurate, Nish... :P
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve been working up the learning curve trying to link F77 functions and subroutines to C/C++ (Pentium, XP, VC++6). I got stuff to work using MinGW’s f77, gcc and g++ compilers in console mode. So now I’m trying to switch to a dialog GUI. I would like to use MFC.
When I got to compiling the .rc file (using windres in MinGW), I started to run into problems. I see that MinGW supports WIN32 API but my suspicion is that it does not work with MFC. Not much on the subject on the net that I was able to find so I would appreciate any perils you(‘ll) can give up.
Just a beginner so please reply in a Newbie dialect of English if you don’t mind.
Thanks,
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have Visual Studio (or just Visual C++) installed? My guess is that you probably don't have the MFC headers and libraries (assuming you don't have them installed).
If you decide to become a software engineer, you are signing up to have a 1/2" piece of silicon tell you exactly how stupid you really are for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week
Zac
|
|
|
|
|
I have Visual Studio 6 SP6 installed and use the VC++6 IDE. I have made MFC apps that run using the VC++ compiler. It is when I try to compile a source (or resource)created using MFC with MinGW compilers that I get into trouble.
I have just come across some snippets that indicate that I will not be able to compile MFC source with MinGW compilers since, for one thing, MFC is copyrighted. I'll try again with a Win32 Application project. If that fails, I'll look into some other IDE supporting Win32 API.
OK?
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
