|
more proof: I used "asseveration" (today's CCC answer) a couple of days ago in a reply to Trollslayer, and now I can't find it any more with CP search.
Google returns this[^] which I enter as evidence; however the link isn't functioning as expected. Even the cached page is unrelated.
Also CP search for "a declaration that is made emphatically" returns nothing.
Seems like a number of items have not been indexed for some reason.
Found it here[^].
 
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what Google is doing there.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So they do make mistakes after all. 
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like our search crawler missed some messages during an incremental crawl. We'll do a full recrawl tonight during off-peak.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Any idea what caused Google to go wrong? see above message[^].
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
The search indexes have been updated and poor Bill can be now found.
A couple of tips. Some punctuation have special meaning in the query, including ':'.
If you have a phase such as a title, put it in quotes "Bill the cat: calling a spayed a spayed", or just leave out the punctuation.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
seems fixed.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
The message this guy[^] has posted just feels like a not so subtle attempt to get people to buy a Skype SDK.
|
|
|
|
|
I read it as a badly worded question for anyone who has downloaded it.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with Nagy - it seems like a "anyone got experience with this before I lash out the cash on it" to me.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
Removed. Thanks.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a list anywhere of the acceptable values for lang=??? in a <pre > tag? When I'm pasting code blocks or tidying up other peoples', I sometimes feel the need to change the language, but I don't know any more than the bleedin' obvious ones.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
Half way down here[^].
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
maybe it is in a sig somewhere...
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
If I go to Q+A, find a good answer and upvote it, it shows the good ol' red segmented bargraph for that answer. Everything else has the newfangled stars. Go away and come back to it, the one I voted now got stars.
Looks like the migration was almost, but not quite, done.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
(I'm guessing it's only temporary.) Tried several ways into Q+A, and always getting the right page with 0 entries no matter whether it's for all, unanswered, my posts, ... No filters, in case you ask.
 Looks like we might have to all follow Luc!
Cheers,
Peter
modified on Friday, June 10, 2011 2:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just doing some database maintenance (defraging indices, which to me is as much fun as mowing a lawn) so the DB was a little busy. All over now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It just got fixed, I was experiencing the same thing few minutes ago, but it looks fine now.
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind getting a few more questions in the programming forums, even some of the funnier/dumber ones would be welcomed; we are starting to miss them.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
When I did a search of forum messages, I selected one of the results which happened to be on page 24052 (from sometime in the year 2001). EVERY time I try to go to that message (or even just that page) I get the message that there's a heavy load and to try again.
Seems to me that it's broken.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, this is a known bug. If a message is old enough, you can't reach it. Very annoying and hopefully they are working on fixing it.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, at the least the message could say, "No can do. Why don't you go have some bacon and try again later?"
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, a sensible suggestion
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Add that to the enhancement list. Instead of 'servers are busy' how about 'hamsters are eating bacon'?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
Should there maybe be a rationale requested once someone tries to downvote questions from the same user consecutively? ..let's say if a user goes and downvotes 2 or 3 answers from me back to back, then on the third try, have it ask why and show his rationale.
I seem to attract stalking univoters from time-to-time, latest doesn't have much impact (-2), but the variety of subjects that he's downvoting (C++, Qt, and MFC) and the time between downvotes (2 minutes between each) lead me to believe its the same person. Also, the 3 posts downvoted are the last three things I had answered, so they're right next to one another if you look at my Q&A answers (reinforcing the theory that someone just looked at that list and downvoted).
...Or maybe we should allow users to block others from being able to see where we've posted so that this irrational behavior is not as easy.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
